Thank you for your welcome! I have a question for you regarding posts about the libraries in SE MN that I have been tasked to do in my position at SELCO (Southeastern Libraries Cooperating). What would you recommend to me to do for future articles (& the one for LaCresent Public Library) to prevent being tagged for speedy deletion? I know you mentioned something on the history of the public library in the commununity it represests, but I may or may not be able to get ahold of the local librarian to get this history from them. Thank you! Winterstar74 (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Winterstar74
what if it exists?Kalajan (talk) 11:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC) i hate u —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.65.101 (talk) 03:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, sorry, I was unexperienced and even though I still am, I'm not as much. And sorry but I didn't put in that comment "(I hate you)". Merry christmas! Kalajan 15:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Been ages since I've had a reason to thank you, so thank you for watching my back. Looks like our pal Kirachinmoku is an eager young pup who's just barking at everything. Hopefully, your gentle reprove will impart a little wisdom. Take care, and thank you again. Gosgood (talk) 22:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
First, let me thank you for making the infobox and table tools available for the NRHP. I've been cranking through the various Maryland entries and they all look terrific! I seem to be unable, however, to use Create a Wiki-formatted table of National Register properties in a given county to create a table for Washington, D.C. Would you be able to assist with this? TIA - Ted--Pubdog (talk) 11:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Just an FYI - that user has been blocked as a troll until February. I don't see any reason why you should be blocked. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey man Im trying to make a page for the legendary Domeshire Manor at Ohio State. It is a land mark on campus and I was about to make a page with members. If you give me time I can put newspaper references from the Columbus Dispatch. Don't be a jack ass just give me some time to finish it. Thanks, Ericjamesmac
--agree with above, admin does not give enough time to edit a page before being deleted :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Landmarkrg (talk • contribs) 20:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
How do you produce a table for a city like Lancaster, Pennsylvania using your county table generator. I submitted a query for Baltimore to see if I was doing it right and it worked. But when I repeated the query for Lancaster it doesn't. Any ideas? I know the tool can be a bit finicky, so maybe I was just off by a little bit in inputing the query. Thanks. --D.B.talk•contribs 06:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I just "test drove" the generator in Brookline, Massachusetts. Hopefully, other people will find it as helpful as I have. I've been busy with finals and such, so I couldn't have done any NRHP tables until now anyways. Take care. --D.B.talk•contribs 05:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello.
Could you please restore the edit history of Torga for me, assuming it was not copyvio? If you like, you can redirect it to List of Forgotten Realms characters if appropriate. Thanks! :) BOZ (talk) 18:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, is there a way to get the infobox generator to do one for a TR or MPS, or do I need to do it manually? Cheers, Murderbike (talk) 23:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen (talk) 23:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your DYK nom on Giant Forest Lodge Historic District. It was nice to find a subject with some meat on its bones, and it was a pleasant surprise to find it leading the DYK's! Acroterion (talk) 05:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey man, listen They are going to create SD! vs. Raw 2010 for next year, but right now nobody knows anything about it yet, it will be released in November, but what date, is undecided by THQ, so you might want to recreate Smackdown vs. Raw 2010 page, because the systems that will have this game will be more likely to be the PS2, Xbox 360, PS3, and the Wii.
(CMpunk2010 (talk) 17:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)).
Oh ok, so when it is announce its gets created, I thought the new one goes up after the year is done with? (CMpunk2010 (talk) 20:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC))
(originally posted on Gwernol's talk page, but he seems to be inactive now)
This article is a battleground between three editors (MickMacNee, Tony May and Biscuittin). In response to a request on the UKT talk page I gave the article a look, downgraded it from B to C class and commented on the talk page on what needed doing, and gave an example showing one way that consensus could be gained on the area that they differ on. So far, Biscuittin has shown some positive response, and made a start on providing references. MickMacNee and Tony May are still wearing their POV blinkers.
I've been aware of the situation for a while, an currently it is at informal mediation with no sign of any progress being made. Would the next step be RFC or AN/I? Wherever the issue is raised, I'd say that all three should be given a fairly short ban from editing the page for any reason, including vandalism (say one month), with a one year block for violation of said ban. They would be allowed to communicate via the article talk page if they had any concerns over the article. That would allow enough time for other editors to work on the article secure in the knowledge that they are not going to be reverted by one of the three belligerents. Mjroots (talk) 06:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Erm, cos you're a human being and we all make mistakes sometimes? Not sure what screwups you're referring to, but I'm sure anyone who criticises and says they haven't made a mistake before would be telling porkies. If you do take a break, let us know when you're coming back and we'll stick the kettle on :o) ColourSarge (talk) 01:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I need to mind my OWN BUSINESS, not anyone else's. And if I can't stop screwing up here, and if I can't avoid the near occasion of screwups, maybe I should find something better to do with my time. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 22:24, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, i see, i was just referring to the wiki hardiness zone page which says its in a zone 5, which surprised me too because from the maps ive seen its only been in a zone 4, you may want to update this page to keep it more up to date as well.
Thanks
--Jd.101 (Jd.101speak) 21:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Also I was wondering if the 'urban heat island' has any effect on minneapolis's plant hardiness, but its still likely to be a zone 4. --Jd.101 (Jd.101speak) 20:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:67.135.49.198, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Elkman (Elkspeak) 00:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Our favorite sockpuppeteer is now impersonating you. See User talk:Ebyabe, User talk:No Guru, User talk:Wknight94. Welcome to the Liebman parade... :) --Ebyabe (talk) 00:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
<font=3> Merry Christmas and all the best for the New Year! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 06:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
---|
Hi, i noticed your dyk. I don't get it. How could he build it 12 years after he moved it? Also in the article, when he "relented" did that mean he built a depot at the stop which had been created at Ferndale Road (is the current depot at Ferndale Road)? Also it would seem he relented already, to begin stopping there, they already didn't have to walk out of town? Maybe it's just me: the dyk is already approved, and I am still a bit rusty after a wikibreak. Happy holidays! doncram (talk) 18:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. This is "Baseball Bugs" In case you are wondering, I am still weighing the pros and cons of my retirement. I am discussing the matter further with my family and my friends during this Holiday season. I will also have another session with my priest. I will be surprised, though, if this will not have been my last Chrismas at Wikipedia. How are you? Don't forget to share your information about problem editors (including vandals and sockpuppeteers) with Wknight94 so that he can include it in his list to Georgewilliamherbert(due in January). Happy New Year. Greetings and salutations. --Baseball Bugs (talk) (talk) 21:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
If you do more than a cursory glance at the user page of the blocked user, you will see why I am happy with his block. I repudiate the views he esposes on his user page, and much of his editing. You will also note that, although I agree with Bedford on some things politically, I avoid editing Civil War articles because it would just be a headache. Your post would seem to indicate that I have stated somewhere that the South has been wronged, and I challenge you to find one edit that substantiates this. As the direct descendent of a Civil War vetran who served honorably when he answered the call to duty, I am proud of that service. One should not forget that service nor cease to honor it when the cause later becomes unpopular. The profession of arms is a noble calling. Honoring those who made the ultimate sacrafice for hearth and home is perfectly legitamate. Hope I cleared up any misconceptions you might have had.Die4Dixie (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Cirt (talk) 11:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Having just finished placing tables on the List of RHPs in WY, I was surprised at the listing for the North Albany Clubhouse in Albany County. Although its address is restricted, the table generator produced a specific set of coords, which when put into Google Maps satellite view, depicts a small building without any other buildings around — I'm sure it's the right one. Do you have any idea how/why the coords for this property appeared but those for others don't? I'm rather curious :-) Nyttend (talk) 22:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Elkman, I appreciate the list of Wiki references. It is a bit overwhelming to absorb all this at once. I published the first monograph on the firm of Purcell & Elmslie in 1994 and have published over fifty articles and essays on their work, and think they deserve a better presence on Wikipedia than they have. Some basic stuff both on the firm entry and their personal biographies that I added in 2006 has since disappeared, replaced with next to nothing or worse, personal irrelevancies. I see the checkbox for notification of page mods now, so I will keep an eye out. Thanks again for your response -- Organicus (Mark Hammons) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Organicus (talk • contribs) 21:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
The Fort Dearborn article was moved yesterday without discussion. I've put out a request to have it moved back to its original location. As you've edited the Fort Dearborn article in the passed, please weigh in on the discussion on the current Fort Dearborn talk page. Shsilver (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I also never wrote any such thing about Obama, nor anyone else. The IP address is mistaken. (Or substitute any appropriate term of ridicule in place of that last word.) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 14:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, can you tell how many NRHP properties there are in NRIS which have been delisted? It might be helpful info if you could chime in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Delisted property guidelines. Thanks! doncram (talk) 11:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting, though the project hates to see it protected, problems need to be sorted out and maybe this time the protection will end the ongoing edit wars.--WillC 03:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Can you please unlock the page, a consensus has been reached that we are going to remove the of screen guys to prevent argues and wars. Kalajan€₣ 21:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello Elkman. An article you created, Ames-Florida House, has been nominated at T:TDYK for main page exposure as part of the Did You Know? column. If you could check out the nomination here, ensuring that the hook used is okay and that the fact used in that hook is backed with an inline citation in the article following the fact's appearance, that would be most excellent. --IvoShandor (talk) 03:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
You protected the List of WWE Employees page due to edit warring, but there are changes needing made. ECW Champion is changing and there's a wrestler returning after being inactive (Ted DiBiase) and he's also joined The Leagacy so that needs changed. Can you do that? - 86.165.60.192 (talk) 11:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I was going to thank you for unprotecting the WWE Employees page, but I think it was premature. I think you're right on some of the points you made in the "unprotected" posting. For the most part, there are sources that are trusted. Most of the project members want to abide by those sources. The problem is not everyone believes a random, non-fact-checking website doesn't qualify as a reliable source. As for ranting about the protection, yes, a lot of people were doing so, rather than discussing the updates that needed to be made. There seems to be a certain sense of urgency with many of the contributors to the wrestling articles, specifically that the article needs to be update as soon as something happens, rather than waiting for a reliable source. (If you notice, the page received edits about once a minute since the protection has been removed.) As for discussing blocks, yeah, I'm guilty of that, but I tried to steer the conversation back to something project related. I don't know. I just see the page being protected relatively soon. Thanks anyway. :) Hazardous Matt 19:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I've reported you for this at the WP:administrators noticeboard, just letting you know. Kalajan€₣ 20:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Well, I guess you won't shy away from making this personal. For starters, I said I didn't know who the user was, not because I didn't know User:Elkman protected the page, but because I HAVE NO IDEA WHO YOU ARE. So, I did read the sections, and if you thought not, you thought incorrectly. Second of all, I had nothing to do with the edit war, and the edits I make to any page on Wikipedia I believe to be constructive. So, when I am deemed not capable of editing an article, when I have only done constructive edits for it, it upsets me. Of course, I don't own the article, and I never insinuated you did either [regardless of your accusation]. I just pointed out that you don't and shouldn't think so, not that you do. Third of all, I deliberately wrote "With all due respect" so you wouldn't take the criticism of your decision to protect the article personally, but then again I don't blame you because I, in all fairness, take almost everything personally too.
Now here goes the real issue...
You told me you addressed my "tactless" comments on the talk page. (Of course, for it to be tactless, it had to be inconsiderate, and I was very considerate to every user who wasn't involved in the edit war, and to even those who were). I joined Wikipedia almost 2 years ago, and I haven't had a bad experience with any admin before, but you sir, have crossed the line. You're supposed authority, you must remember, is just being called an admin on a free encyclopedia site (no much more authority then someone who is level 50 in an MMORPG).
You insulted every user involved in WikiProject Professional Wrestling including other admins, which are involved. Your comment "I suppose I was expecting too much for a group of professional wrestling fans to agree on how to edit an article. After reading this article and this article, I have more of an insight into the minds of today's 18- to 24-year olds." is completely inappropiate, it bites users, is completely civil and involves personal attacks. I would suggest you read WP:ADMIN about the nature of your conduct, and the sanctions that are proper, as I should recommend you to be stripped from your access and "abilities". However, I will not. I will explain that I am currently a Biology major at the InterAmerican University in Puerto Rico, and frankly, I have more important things to do than edit Wikipedia. Wikipedia is mainly a hobby, and I encourage to everyone that it should be that way. The way you are treating it is a job and a way to enforce your authority (at least when you dealt with WP:PW). If I were you, I'd think before I write these types of comments, and maybe even not waste the time of writing them at all, instead of wasting time blocking yourself.
The user, Kalajan, was rightfully blocked, and should have been blocked for longer. The protection of the article was unnecessary, and I criticized it with no attitude. You, however, answered with tremendous attitude, as you were upset. WP:COOL, WP:UPSET and WP:CONSENSUS should help you with these situations. I am no admin, but this doesn't mean you are above me. I still, with all due respect, recommend you to cool down and seek consensus in a proper way, and in no way will I take you to ANI. I respect you, for you are an admin, and even though its not a big deal, it is a kind of reward for your work on Wikipedia. And if you are the editor, your adminship represents, then you will heed this advice, because the next person might not be so kind. Raagio T/C Guest Book 01:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Elkman (Elkspeak) 01:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
This is a request for a steward at Meta to remove my adminship. Clearly, I no longer have the trust of the community or the temperament necessary to remain an admin. It's causing me too much stress and has brought me into too many situations that I should just ignore and mind my own business. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Elkman, I echo what Acroterion said about your skill with templates and the utility of the generator you created. You are a valuable editor, with or without the admin buttons. If you ever need help from someone who has them, be sure to let me know. Jonathunder (talk) 15:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I would hate to be you right now. Anyway dude, just cool off. I'm from WT:PW and there are alot of users there who do not understand the rules. I want to say you did the right thing by protecting the WWE roster. Don't let the drama get to you man.--WillC 20:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Elkman, like I said, I respect you as an admin. However, I'm going to have to ask this question. What the hell? Here's the problem. If you ACTUALLY want to "deadminize" yourself, you can request it personally, and they will give it to you. There is no need for this drama. I get it you were upset, and I also got upset once with an admin when I began in Wikipedia, and clearly you have the trust of many users. But, for all means, just stand up for what you think is right. Keep on imposing your decisions, and making edits that you think are right. Don't submit to other people, and don't get down on yourself just because I wrote that message on your talk page. A lot of users would die to be an admin, and you got the opportunity to leave your mark. You get to choose which type of mark. A good one or a bad one. Of course, Kalajan a good faith editor, took you to ANI. So what? You made a mistake. You told some people to fuck off and leave you alone. The problem is that some of those people or didn't do anything or just had your best interests. I still think I have your best interests when I wrote that message and when I write this one, but maybe you'll take it the wrong way. Who knows? One thing is for sure. You are an admin, you have a chance, and you should stop jokingly sanctioning yourself, because in reality, we all will meet with assholes like Kalajan who are "out to get you". Get yourself together, and start doing what's right. (I.E. Like going to my talk page and warning me for implying Kalajan is an asshole) Cheers, Raaggio 22:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC) (BTW, it's Raaggio now, I had a typ-o when I requested for renaming)
By the way, I like your work in List of RHPs in Hennepin. The NRHP list-articles and the individual pages aren't for all readers, of course, but i think they are informative and nice in a low-key way serving historically-minded persons in many locales.
Anyhow, I find myself adding links to the NRHP MPS / MRA documents mentioned in some articles' NRHP infoboxes, and I wonder if you could provide a one-off report on all the MPS/MRA documents in your database, organized by state. Like this useful this one-off report on disambig pages you did, which i went through systematically once, and have revisited recently to recreate a couple that got deleted. (If you wouldn't mind expanding that dab report all the way to 2 duplicate entries, too, i'd like that also.) I'd like to go through the MPS's and create stubs that at least provide links to the PDF documents available at the NPS. In individual articles' infoboxes, I have often put in a direct link to the relevant PDF doc, but as an external link that is not exactly correct. It would be better just to put the MPS doc name in double square brackets, and create a short/stub article for each one. I've also done that some.
Hope it warms up in Minnesota soon. Cheers, doncram (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Doncram, I'll have to wait until midweek next week to do anything about that Multiple Property Submission thing. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 17:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Ames-Florida House at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dravecky (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
After the thread on the nrhp page, I substantially rewrote the article by going back to the sources. Pls feel free to take a look and help improve the article. Thanks dm (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Alaska is still without tables for its NRHP sites; I would have added them by now, but I've become a little confused with the generator. Some boroughs and census areas come out fine, such as Wade Hampton Census Area (an amazing total of 0 sites), Dillingham Census Area, North Slope Borough, and Bristol Bay Borough, but it says that ones such as Prince of Wales-Outer Ketchikan Census Area don't exist. It's also likely been confused by the recent separation of Skagway from the former Skagway-Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, which has now been reduced to Hoonah-Angoon; it says that neither S-H-A nor H-A exists, and searching Skagway gets the same result whether or not I have "independent city" clicked. Not complaining; I'm just curious if there's something I can do better? Nyttend (talk) 05:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
County name | Number of properties |
---|---|
Aleutian Islands | 22 |
Aleutians East | 0 |
Anchorage | 32 |
Bethel | 7 |
Bristol Bay | 15 |
Dillingham | 9 |
Fairbanks North Star | 34 |
Haines | 9 |
Juneau | 26 |
Kenai Peninsula | 33 |
Ketchikan Gateway | 18 |
Kodiak Island | 19 |
Lake and Peninsula | 4 |
Matanuska-Susitna | 27 |
Nome | 26 |
North Slope | 22 |
Northwest Arctic | 2 |
Prince of Wales-Outer K. | 7 |
Sitka | 22 |
Skagway-Yakutat-Angoon | 26 |
Southeast Fairbanks | 12 |
Valdez-Cordova | 34 |
Wade Hampton | 0 |
Wrangell-Peterburg | 12 |
Yukon-Koyukuk | 42 |
Oh, and I just realized that I did the query without checking the listing code to see if all of the properties are actually listed. I didn't exclude the ones where the owner objected to listing, or where something was removed from the National Register. Still, this should be a semi-approximate result. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 14:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
How you holding up? Keeper | 76 04:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The building of St. Vincent De Paul Roman Catholic Church (New Orleans) has been around since 1866; in fact, the congregation was first established in 1838. And even though five parishes merged into one, and even though the building suffered major fire damage in 2003 and then got hit by Hurricane Katrina in 2006, the building is still around.
Meanwhile, wrestlers can be hired or fired by the WWE at a moment's notice. I wouldn't be surprised if there are all sorts of fake hirings and firings all the time, just to put on a good show.
And yet wrestling, at least as far as a lot of editors on Wikipedia are concerned, is far more important than old church buildings in New Orleans.
--Elkman (Elkspeak) 00:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
....And there are editors that think Pokemon is the only important topic here. Or British Museums about trams. Or lakes. Or goldfish. Or scuba equipment. Or the Simpsons. Or churches in New Orleans. Or murder victims. Or WWE. Unfortunately, the frustration is in the demographics of the users: median age of "active Wikipedians" = 12. Maybe not physical age, but mental age most certainly. By very definition, that means that pop culture topics will have disproportionately larger numbers of editors, therefore larger chances of ensuing drama. Frankly, it seems there's more interest in the drama (which is of course natural - for example, how often do you notice the cars on your way to work? I bet you notice the ones that have crashed into each other, but you rarely remember the silver Honda that passed going the speed limit). There will always be a set of editors, in large number, that are more concerned with the minor characters of a manga, or a star wars character, and those editors will always outnumber those trying to build pages about the forgotten and obscure poets, neighborhoods, churches, films, villages, etc. That doesn't diminish the important place and task of those that choose to work towards enhancing the lesser-known areas, it magnifies it, and I'm truly sorry you feel otherwise at the moment. I hope you rediscover the enthusiasm that brought you here, because your work is valuable and crucial for the balance within the project. Honestly, I've struggled myself lately, in large part because of the idiocy and bureaucracy that seems to have become the norm. I admit I think its the admin part. I don't use the tools anymore, haven't for months. The drama drags otherwise solid, dedicated editors into the fray because of the sense of obligation that follows a successful rfa (usually onset by a plea for help somewhere that's hard to ignore - think car crash victim). Once the view of this place is skewed towards only seeing the car crashes, we forget just how critical it is to focus on the cars that are still moving along waiting to be noticed and tended to (wow, I stretched that analogy way past its breaking point). And no, I'm not drunk, that you for asking :-) Take care of yourself. Spring is coming! [citation needed] Keeper | 76 04:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Kalajan actually did report Kaizer13 to WP:ANI, it was just very early, he brought no evidence, and was told to retract the report when his edits came into question. HAZardousMATTtoxic 16:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Memories: [1] :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 02:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help in fixing the article on this very important subject. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Could you please see Talk:Camlin Hotel#Odd citation? Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 22:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky (talk) 07:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Monster Energy.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon))
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Monster Energy.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JaGatalk 08:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Monster Energy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGatalk 16:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Could you check this property in the database? According to its article, it was listed in 1979, but it no longer appears at nr.nps.gov, so I'm guessing that it's been delisted. On that note, how do we find when properties are delisted? Nyttend (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Hope ur having a great vacation somewhere. When you get a chance later, could you consider the issue noted at User talk:Wwoods#Help -- coordinate corrections, and comment there? It seems to me that some programming work by you would save this guy thousands of future edits. Thanks doncram (talk) 22:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)