User:Eternal-Entropy, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Eternal-Entropy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Eternal-Entropy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the MfD discussion was keep - withdrawn by nominator. JohnCD (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a free host. Please move all your stuff linked to from User:Eternal-Entropy/Literature on to your own website. There is no need to re-format - there are numerous wiki sites where you can put the articles. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are thousands of User essays, what's so different about these ? --Ne0 (talk) 03:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Most of Eternal-Entropy's essays have no connection with Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Free Online Libraries -Hopefully you will be able to better understand the "connection" with this. --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 09:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:User poetry, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rcsprinter (speak) @ 18:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship to Ne0Freedom (talk · contribs)? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

user:Ne0Freedom's idea, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ne0Freedom/Usernames --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 16:31, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eternal-Entropy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It is perfectly within Wikipedia rules to have multiple accounts

Decline reason:

Only within very narrow and clearly defined exceptions, and you haven't explained why you qualify. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Freedom has a price, and that is Security. Likewise, Security has a price, and that is Freedom. Wikipedia can't have both. Wikipedia can NOT have freedom for it's users as well as security from it's users. Either you create a walled garden or an open garden, you can't have both in the same place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.49.145 (talk) 12:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pollution at Ganga Banks en.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]