I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place ((Help me)) on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
YouTube and IMDb are not reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marisha Ray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marisha Ray, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hello, Fajority!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AfC notification: Draft:Marisha Ray has a new comment[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marisha Ray. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AfC notification: Draft:Marisha Ray has a new comment[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marisha Ray. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:54, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AfC notification: Draft:Marisha Ray has a new comment[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marisha Ray. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
All sources must be reliable. Beyond that, the bulk of any article must be based on indpendent sources (two-thirds of the draft's inline citations are to her employer). Moreover, multiple independent, in-depth, secondary sources are expected.
I'm not sure all the draft's sources are reliable, but for the purposes of this analysis, let's assume they are. The independent sources are: two theses, twinfinite.net, ukf.com, and comicbook.com. Robyn Hope's thesis is the only arms-length source containing significant coverage. From there it's a long step down to twinfinite.net's 75 words about her and another drop down to the passing mentions in the other three sources. These sources do not demonstrate that she meets WP:NACTOR.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marisha Ray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marisha Ray, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hello, Fajority. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marisha Ray".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]