This is an archive of past discussions with GoShow. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
All Pages: | 1 - ... (up to 100) |
Yes--GoShow (...............) 17:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Try responding at Talk:List of reportedly haunted locations in the United States. I wrote a reply there as well as replying on my talk page.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 21:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. ' Gorlack36 (talk) 21:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi GoShow, I don't want to leave the wrong impression. You are becoming autoconfirmed because four days have passed and you have made more than ten edits. I am just an editor like yourself and I did not make this happen. Welcome! Celestra (talk) 01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello! GoShow,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 23:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Christmas Choir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Christmas Choir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 16:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
:- ) DCS 23:16, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
The discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Christmas Choir will likely remain open for a few more days, though I expect it will be closed as a keep. Patience... the process must run its course. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Message sent with Global message delivery.
Hi GoShow. I saw you had manually added Gray Wolf to the Good Article nomination queue. The bot responsible for maintaining the GA process has reverted that addition, but I've added a nomination template to Talk:Gray Wolf with your name and the time of your nomination, so it will be automatically added back into the queue quite soon. If you're nominating other articles for GAN, remember to just add ((subst:GAN|subtopic=)) to the article's talk page, filling in the subtopic, and the rest will be taken care of automatically. Good luck with the article! GRAPPLE X 20:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
In that numerous sources are available with which to improve this article AND as improvments have actually commenced, might you consider withrawing your nomination? 00:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
I posted a GA review for the wolf article. LittleJerry (talk) 02:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Book Sources for new edit on Haunted Places: New Edit for Egypt
I already confirmed it to them, thank you.--GoShow (...............) 17:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Regarding the image you uploaded. Please check your email and respond as soon as you can.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 18:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you [sbharris] for your many efforts to your many contributions about the life of knowledge and mystery for science and believing the many quantities and phases of possibilities and discovery for ongoing science seekers, including me, --GoShow (...............) 05:58, 5 June 2012 |}
Why, thank you for that. 30,000 edits over 6 years, more than half in the sciences. And, yet, this may be my first barnstar ever on WP. And it must be a sincere one, free of vaseline or lipbalm, since I have absolutely nothing to do with wikipolitics. Ghosh! SBHarris 06:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
What? As immortality in fiction says, the meaning of "immortal" tends to vary. (But I think everyone can agree that an immortal character is someone who just can not die. Just can't. Because is not mortal. Like The Nameless One.) In any case, "Category:Fictional immortals" not only does not explain what the criteria to qualify someone as "immortal", at all, but it's also being considered for deletion. And for a good reason, I guess. Also, Dante (Devil May Cry), for example, does not have "the ability to live forever or be immune from death". He will grow old and die, as he gre up from a newborn baby, and that if something won't kill him first (he's just difficult to kill, not invincible). And yes, fictional demons is a parent category to fictional half-demons, too. --Niemti (talk) 16:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
There you go, we don't have to argue, let's work this together, and create edits about notable immortals on this site immortality in fiction to see who are truly immortal thank you--GoShow (...............) 16:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
...and that's why you've got to add this category on the case-by-case judgement to the various characters, and not stamp it over entire other vast categories. (If it survives the nomination for deletion, that is. And when it gets defined, at all.) --Niemti (talk) 16:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi GoShow/Archive 1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
Thank you for your many creations and tireless edits to allow the article Gray Wolf to become nominated as a Good Article! Work on Nominator!--50.122.54.84 (talk) 19:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
"¡Superb!"—GoShow(...............) |
The Science Barnstar of Honor | |
Thank you for your many eloquent dedications about the knowledge and mystery about articles about Science and Chemistry, and believing the in the many theories and phases of possibilities and discoveries for ongoing magnanimous science seekers! --Mr.Goblins (talk) 19:16, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
"¡Meritorious!"—GoShow(..............) |
Hi, I noticed your username was added to User:SuggestBot/Requests, but by someone. Feel free to re-add your username while logged in and I'll get to it as soon as possible. Thanks, Nettrom (talk) 15:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC) (SuggestBot's caretaker)
Thanks--GoShow (...............) 00:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the reference. For dental caries a published review article or textbook would be better. References can be easily created using the tool in the top of the edit box and either the PMID or ISBN and page number. Cheers. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your talk page please reply on mine) 16:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
If you are there can I spare a minute with You, keep you in touch, thanks.--GoShow (...............) 04:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello GoShow, I noticed that you have setup auto archiving. Three recommendations:
Thanks trying to test this edit here--GoShow (...............) 00:09, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Dougweller (talk) 16:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Can you please explain these Edit Summaries ? [1],[2][3],[4] and few more ?
You did not had access to use STiki at the time you made these edits and you have made these edits manually *Without* using WP:STiki but even then you have written "Using STiki". --DBigXray 20:40, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Basically, I would rather call it a preview it's on the Wikipedia:STiki section called
Hello, GoShow, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and DBigXray 05:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC) |
I like your reverts. 24.146.225.229 (talk) 06:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback! You're right in that my minor edit didn't add anything to the article, but it did take away a factual error: The original text said that "He had a son, Richard, who joined the First Crusade. Richard's son Roger was later regent of the principality of Antioch." but that is not true. The Richard who joined the First Crusade was the son of William of the Principate, Drogo's brother. His son Roger did become Regent of Antioch but was not a grandson of Drogo. Drogo's real son was Richard of Hauteville who was not involved in the Crusade and (as far as we can tell) did not leave issue, vice-regal or otherwise. Hence, my edit restored the article to truthfulness, though admittedly I did not contribute info on the 'real' Richard. Sorry for the trouble I've given you :)
Accuracy probably doesn't matter anyway - this is wikipedia, after all!122.60.103.104 (talk) 04:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Please do not restore material to these articles without discussion on the talk page. Your edits have been reverted. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I am looking into more book sources right now thanks.--GoShow (...............) 17:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
What that means is, basically, that most of the material in this articles is still unencyclopedic, and in violation of WP:FRINGE, and will eventually be deleted. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:59, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I read your comment on WP:RSN and I agree, here's the deal I will delete the comment summaries, other than the calendars I will keep and the attributions, the summaries I will delete, they do seem unbias, however I'll let the people decide on other psudoscience webpages to check if they are those characteristics, other than that I agree, I'll delete the characteristics.--GoShow (...............) 20:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I restored the deletion because the content was from another page entirely, and was part of some vandalism efforts yesterday. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 18:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, no problem--GoShow (...............) 18:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
|
||
Congratulations, GoShow! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Yaris678 (talk) 09:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
Allow me to suggest you are being a bit of a jerk here. The image(which I realize you uploaded) is tiny, of what is presumably a large and detail-packed work, with no proper details or explanation given. What is it actually? It doesn't show reflection symmetry at all (even the central girls are different) unlike many other Ancient Egyptian object images on Commons, and there is anyway no mention of the subject in the article. It just doesn't justify inclusion, even if you like it, and the caption makes it WP:OR, and bad OR at that. Johnbod (talk) 04:22, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi GoShow. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Calmer Waters 05:12, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Just a quick note to tell you I have reverted a large amount of vandalism off your user page (and he's just done mine as well :) ). Mdann52 (talk) 19:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, GoShow. I reverted you on this, per my statements in that edit summary. Why did you revert before that? Did your vandalism tool automatically identify it as vandalism or otherwise unconstructive? 118.142.35.126 (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
I have seen your message to me. I think you may be talking about the wikisource: project. In addition to the English wikisource, I think they have one for all languages together. With regards, Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 02:39, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi. Your interactions with the anonymous editor at User talk:76.248.149.47 led me to start watching your talk page. I've noticed a troubling trend in your use of rollback rights and in your difficulties dealing with anonymous editors (especially in differentiating between vandals and constructive contributors). I urge you to slow down and pay close attention to what you're doing. Please review the following:
Absolutely do not issue any further warning templates unless you are certain the editor is clearly in the wrong. If you find you've made a mistake, immediately acknowledge your mistake and apologize.
What I'm asking you to do is the same stuff I expect of myself as an administrator and what's expected of all editors here, so it should not be hard if you slow down and take some care.
I appreciate your zeal in watching over our content but I hope you'll temper it some. Rollback privileges are a powerful and useful tool; I'd hate to have to revoke yours.
Regards, --A. B. (talk • contribs) 21:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
From--GoShow (............................) Please Read:*Read the paragraph from,
this user BencherliteTalk once was on my section called
Here, too, I'm not sure what your rationale was to rollback my edit [5], and to issue a vandalism warning [6]. An apparently COI account twice copied and pasted a curriculum vitae into the article, which is considered disruptive for several reasons, per WP:RESUME. I've again reverted to the non-resume version. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I do smell a rat who does want me out of Wikipedia less than a year eventually, bu I do value Wikipedia enough not to quit.
I'm just reviewing, but what I'm saying is I have had users back in the days who tried IP accounts to test myself and hopefully to be blocked from editing, and I hope there is some answer to protect my user page and any files to not come into conflict with many IP users who have probably do have a confirmed account, although won't say it, if not thanks anyway.--GoShow (............................) 21:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello GoShow. When I was reverting some vandalism I checked the other contributions of 2.29.139.189 and noticed his sole purpose seems to be to disrupt you. He has only made 11 edits, of which were 10 edits reverting you (vandalizing an article again). I've re-reverted the articles so they are okay again, but thought I'd warn you as well. EmilTyf (talk) 03:06, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for saving me--GoShow (............................) 06:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello GoShow, Why were my changes to the page of Mikhail Barshchevsky were considered as an act of vandalism or didn't appear constructive? All of the information was important (one of the most popular Russian TV games and membership in Russian Academy of Natural Sciences is a great honour). Am I wrong? Thanks,Tatacolt
P.S. I have this new report about Felix Baumgartner was on the section of WP:RSN about Felix Baumgartner may or may not dive in and I am hoping to add the report on 2012 archives, but it may become sensationalism or may become a world record in time, but I am hoping the efforts in for the additional information may be suitable in some way possible if it happens.--GoShow (............................) 17:07, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
@Drmies, I can see there are issues about Millennial Generation and the so-called Millennial Generations of Generation X, Y, and Z. I would hope to explain some psuedoscience about the articles of these Generation X, Y, Z would be far fetched to reliable opinions instead of information pertaining to the actual example, in case it may be articles for deletion, since it is guess the outcomes of generations and their traits as comparing to someones future and genetic traits.--GoShow (............................) 21:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
@ Itsmejudith Thanks for your thoughts on the subject on WP:RSN. I did meant other sources such as a Daily Newspaper, or a book of Records, until the day comes.--GoShow (............................) 20:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm most embarrassed that I forgot to thank you immediately for that barnstar :) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey, GoShow, just wondering: did you mean to post this to the Teahouse questions page? I don't see any question in there, and it looks kinda non-sequtur, so... Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:56, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
What's the problem? 124.253.56.123 (talk) 17:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Your opinionated phrase of talk on Lajja has been reverted.--GoShow (............................) 17:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Probably neither. Changing from American to UK spelling, as was done here, isn't vandalism, but most likely a misguided good-faith edit by a user unfamiliar with any other spelling variants than those of his/her own culture. Your revert was correct per WP:ENGVAR, but you shouldn't speak to newbies as if they were vandals. They're sensitive! Instead, please explain the problem in your edit summary (for instance, with a link to WP:ENGVAR). You, and not STiki, are responsible for what the edit summary says. Regards, Bishonen | talk 00:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC).
Whilst this revert was undoubtedly correct I think the edit summary of vandalism wasn't. I don't know how STiki works so it may be a problem with that. DeCausa (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
The Silver STiki Barnstar of Merit
| ||
Congratulations, GoShow! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 10,000 classification threshold using STiki.
We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC) |
Why have you taken down the research from credible sources and kept your quotes of a review that offers nothing but negative opinion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.87.87 (talk) 14:21, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Apparently, I did not edit or take down your research; the person was User Yobol, an example here , whom you were edit warring on the article please check from your own contributions.GoShow (............................)
Hello, I did remove the scentence about Joakim Nätterquist starring as Achilles in Revenge of the Titans, becaus the source link indicates no such thing. The link is an interview with him, but it is mainly about fasion and no what so ever referance to Achilles or Revenge of the Titans. http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dn.se%2Fpa-stan%2Fshopping%2Fjoakim-natterqvist-klader-som-konst%2F 24.56.113.200
(talk) 16:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Okay thanks for doing it and pointing it out.--GoShow (............................) 19:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please comment on the above SPI that was opened? Thanks. --Rschen7754 06:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here))
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)GoShow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a college IP and yes multiple users have been used the labs multiple times, but remember there are confirmed users who do use multiple accounts some for the common good, some for test edit to vandalize, but if you wish to block this edit do so, as I did have a former adminship from over the last 8 years, while moving to another state, however I do respect for Reaper Eternal and SB Harris whom I have seen over the last five years, respectively admired by the user's performance for pointing it out as it had happened, but as of this moment this account will be finished, I do have older accounts such as User: NaiPiak and must go to my orignal account, there are administrative and confirmed users which have multiple accounts in any occasion though I will not say, but I respect the test vandalism used in this function, this will be the last edit for this account and wish the best for editing.
Decline reason:
I'm declining for three reasons. First, your story about being on a college IP seems to be false based on technical evidence. Second, you admitted to at least a few sockpuppets. And finally, you're saying you won't use this account anymore anyway, so there's no point in unblocking you. Just an FYI, if your intention is to edit using yet another account, think again, as you can see we've been able to catch you at it. -- Atama頭 22:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.