Welcome!
Hello, Hassandoodle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((helpme))
before the question. Again, welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Creation appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.. Please have a look at the article's talk page. Cheers, DVdm (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Creationism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. - DVdm (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Creationism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - There was no consensus on the talk page about this edit. DVdm (talk) 14:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hassandoodle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was reverting falsely made changes by Scientizzle who marked several reverts with a Minor Edit, which were not in fact minor. Additionally, as per the discussion page on the article in question, there appears to be an agenda by some to prevent my change to the article, several other editors are in agreement or somewhat in agreement with me.
Decline reason:
You are in violation of the three-revert rule; that rule applies to all of us, no matter how strongly we believe ourselves to be right. When your block expires, try some of the suggestions at WP:DISPUTE rather than edit-warring, but if consensus is still against you, you may have to accept that your preferred version will not be the form the article takes. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:50, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hassandoodle, it is inappropriate to be making negative comments about the religion (or assumed religion) of other participants here.[1] Please review our policy on "no personal attacks". If you make other comments of this nature, it could result in another account block. So please, could you focus your energies on article content, and not on the contributors? Thanks, --Elonka 19:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Creation-evolution controversy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Aunt Entropy (talk) 18:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)