Hello, Helveticus96, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((Help me))
before the question. Again, welcome! Drm310 (talk) 00:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
--Drm310 (talk) 00:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
User:Helveticus96, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Helveticus96 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Helveticus96 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. The Banner talk 12:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
this is really absurd, we can bring every argument about usage of Czechia e.g articles from Ner York Times from 1925 clearly showing usage of Czechia and everything gets deleted but Yopie and Co. If it happens to you several times after spending long hours working on articles, I can understand user gets emotional. We have all documents on file, decrees of Ministery of Foreign affairs which clearly state Czechia should be used, but what can we do if it gets deleted at all occasions? Please check www.czechia-initiative.com, thank you! Helveticus96 (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Helveticus96, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 14:11, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you as well, I am using my account from 2 different IP addresses, thats all, I can not imagine this is forbidden (Helveticus96 (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC))
See Talk:Czech Republic. As you know, Wikipedia had decided to stick with Czech Republic, at least for now. Don't take it upon yourself to start changing CR to Czechia in random articles in spite of the Wikipedia community's decision. That is a waste of time, and kind of aggressive behaviour. Czechia's time will come if it enters into common usage. For now, you have to accept the consensus. If you don't, you're just being annoying. Ground Zero | t 14:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Do not threaten. Moreover, in something, what describes itself as "free encyclopedy". Czechia is an official geographic name of the country. The name is registered by UN. You should respect it. In all other cases you prefer geographic names of countries, thus, there is any reason to hide the name. Heptapolein (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
I am really curious, who and upon which criteria is deciding about "common usage". As the opposition from the administrators from Czechia is so fierce, because "they don't like it", I assume, Wikipedia will be the last resort of republican nonsense.Helveticus96 (talk) 08:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Eswatini is not a common name in English and Wikipedia is using it, can someone explain this to me? Why are you fighting Czechia with the argument it's not a common name, and it's easily acceptable for Swaziland after a few months? Never heard anybody calling Swaziland Eswatini. Helveticus96 (talk) 09:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Any data to support this statement? There 4,5 million hits at Google for Eswatini, 246 million for Swaziland. Swaziland is used much more than Eswatini and will be for some time. Can YOU explain to me your obsession with deleting Czechia all over the place? Czechia is the official short name used on the EU country list, so Wikipedia should respect this, but this update was constantly reverted on Wikipedia. So why are few administrators deleting even evident truth from Wikipedia?Helveticus96 (talk) 12:00, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
You didn't answer my question about Eswatini, this is your POV and not a fact.Helveticus96 (talk) 12:09, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
...I have never seen so persistent and nonsensical effort to deny facts as Khajidha has shown by every his reaction to this issue. This is evident POV, which should be inspected. Including illegal and absolutely out of regulations canceled voting about using Czechia in Wikipedia. For some people is simply still the Earth flat until the time, when somebody more powerful says NO. It is obvious manipulation and abuse of power. What about to do something more beneficial for people, e.g. care for the mentally disabled - Khajida would solve two problems in one by it :-))))) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.144.106.201 (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Name of the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
I have metioned many different times not to use primary sources per WP:PRIMARY and WP:RS, yet you continue to do so and form a list-like section which goes against WP:WWIN. At the very least, this should be discussed on the talk page, at the most, this will be taken to one of the Administrator noticeboards. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 03:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Could you please tell me what is "highly inaccurate" as you claim? All sources are correct and all references are correct as well. The article is called "Adoption of Czechia", so examples of usage should be documented there.Helveticus96 (talk) 13:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Name of the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Name of the Czech Republic, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please stop posting your own original research with primary sources. I've mentioned this many times before. Content such as "_____ uses Czechia" and a link to the page where it is used, is NOT sufficient for Wikipedia. It is not a reliable source as it is a primary source, and shows no context for the inclusion and amounts to OR on your behalf. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 21:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
This is your final warning to start using sources properly. I've already given you many resources to understand how sourcing works here. One last time, please see WP:SOURCES, WP:RS, WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. The source you included at Name of the Czech Republic gives no context as to the date of inclusion. You have done this multiple times now and I have messaged you or posted on the talk page each time saying how this is improper. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 07:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Helveticus96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Vladimir Hirsch, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Vladimir Hirsch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Vladimir Hirsch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 07:13, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Per title, per [this edit] Please read WP:SOURCES and WP:RELIABILITY . Social media links are not sources. Please also stop listifying Name of the Czech Republic and read WP:UNDUE. We're not making a list of every single person who uses the word. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 05:36, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Name of the Czech Republic. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 05:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vladimir Hirsch, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Helveticus96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vladimir Hirsch".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)