Welcome

Hello, Icantevennnnn, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place ((Help me)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 12:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Icantevennnnn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Icantevennnnn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Faraneh Vargha-Khadem

Hi, I'm Mabalu. Icantevennnnn, thanks for creating Faraneh Vargha-Khadem!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I have had a quick search and the subject does appear notable with multiple sources and news mentions of her involvement in a number of projects and concerns. Please do consider expanding the article to reflect this as at current it is very short.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mabalu (talk) 11:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Greetings. In regard to the ongoing discussions at Talk:Linda Sarsour, I would strongly suggest that you take some time to read the Biographies of living persons policy, especially the parts about being fair to the subject, maintaining a cautious style when writing, sticking with reliable sources, and avoiding sensationalism. Also please note that the Identifying reliable sources guideline stresses a source's reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This is why we tend to stick to mainstream, well-known sources, and avoid editorials for statements of fact, especially in biographies. — Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would also draw your attention to the due weight portion of the Neutral point of view policy, which mentions that we strive to fairly represent significant, published viewpoints on a subject in proportion to their prominence in reliable sources. We certainly do not draw novel conclusions from disparate sources in order to advance a particular interpretation. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you guys have treated my contributions very unfairly and as a result I have lost all motivation to continue editing on this site. I have decided to stop editing. Good luck protecting people you like from criticism.Icantevennnnn (talk) 22:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]