This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
Hallo, I'm trying to add the DCC format in the formats section of the page because is missing. I've this albun on all media, anf there is the DCC version.
The DCC tape by Philips ( Digital compact cassette) is an old recording format from philips. I'm the owner of this media, original from Sire-WB with the Immaculate collection album on it, is an original tape, not a copy. If you prefer, I can send you a Photo of it, or if you don't trust in me please check in the net and search DCC the immaculate collection or follow this link: http://themadonnacollection.blogspot.it/2010/08/immaculate-collection-dcc.html Now I think that you have seen that this album exist in the dcc format, please restore on the page what have you removed,or tell me to do it thx a lot RK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Razhellkalee (talk • contribs) 12:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
the info is reliable, the proof is a photo of the cassette, but if you dont'let me add the info what can I do ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Razhellkalee (talk • contribs) 17:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi – I've seen your edit to the article and it seems fair enough, I have no problem with it. I just wanted to query something on what might seem a technicality: I'm not sure what Wikipedia policy is on "ownership" of songs, but it has always seemed to me that it should be credited to its writers, not to the artist who originally recorded it. So it seems more accurate to me to have the opening sentence as "'Don't Cry for Me Argentina' is a song written by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice... first recorded and released as a single in 1976 by Julie Covington, and covered in 1996 by Madonna for her film version of Evita", or something like that. But I'm not going to argue about it, I just wanted your opinion: I'm far more interested in getting missing factual information into the article, like the charts and certifications tables for Covington's version of the single. Thanks. Richard3120 (talk) 12:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't have any strong views on this, but as a good case study of the issue that arises from crediting a song to its original performer, see "Tainted Love" – by that criterion it should be called "a single by Gloria Jones" but it can't be disputed that many, many more people are aware of the song (and will be looking for information on it on Wikipedia) because of the cover versions by Soft Cell or Marilyn Manson. The current version of the article describes it as "a song composed by Ed Cobb, formerly of American group The Four Preps, which was originally recorded by Gloria Jones in 1964. It attained worldwide fame after being covered by Soft Cell in 1981 and has since been covered by numerous groups and artists", which to my eyes looks a far better representation. Richard3120 (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Incorrect my ***, I was not only there, but there are images and videos plus it's mentioned on Breedlove's website that he was there as a supporting act with Lady Starlight. It's you who are vandalizing the article by removing correct information, and you are therefore reported. Thank you. Squidoh (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't think the song's genre is power pop (with rock) or electronic, because it just attempt at guitar riff. I found other sources which says "much-loved pop ballad" [1] and "Eurodisco ballad" [2]. 183.171.174.133 (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey! I wanted to know that how much should be the minimum sales by a remix album to be included in the list. For example can the album Recharged with sales 111,000 be included in the list on the 8th position cause I searched on the web and I found no other remix album between 500,000 and 111,000. Suggestions? Mike:Golu · [ Confidential message ] 10:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I'm Musiclover123456789! My edit on 1989 it's true. Because you continue to change it? User:Musiclover123456789 (User talk: Musiclover123456789) 18:50, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi IndianBio! I noticed that your signature has some code in it that has been deprecated with recent CSS protocol changes. Therefore, it is possible that with future browser editions, or future mediawiki software, it may not continue to render properly for everyone. So, I've re-coded it for you with non-deprecated code to make it future-proof. This is the revised code:
—<span style="font:bold 125% Courier New;">[[User:IndianBio|<span style="color:#6F00FF;">Indian:</span><span style="color:#FF033E;">BIO</span>]]</span> • <sup>[ [[User talk:IndianBio|<span style="font:bold 100% Tempus Sans ITC; color:#1C1CF0;">ChitChat</span>]] ]</sup>
which renders as: —Indian:BIO • [ ChitChat ]
If the size is a bit off from your current version, you can play with the font size percentages in the code. Hope you don’t mind me taking the liberty of doing this for you. — SpikeToronto 05:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Drowned World Tour 2001 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Drowned World Tour 2001 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Drowned World Tour 2001 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 05:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Drowned World Tour 2001 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Drowned World Tour 2001 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello IndianBio. Regarding your recent edits of Talk:1989 (Taylor Swift album), the following. As you can see in the § Edit request 12 October 2014 section, the template currently states "It is requested that an edit be made to this article that the user below does not want to make because of a conflict of interest." The request is still open. That is because you're using the "answered=yes" parameter, which, as I explained in my edit summary, is not a valid parameter for Template:Request edit. Please read the template documentation and then undo your last edit. Thank you. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 21:52, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello IndianBio! Yes, I fixed it a few minutes ago! Thank you for suggesting this update, I hope it correctly works! --Stee888 (talk) 09:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you've just altered the above template so that it links better to the relevant chart (a good thing). However, something that has preoccupied me for a while now is that the GFK Chart-Track site (which the template uses) only goes back to the year 2000. For singles at least, it's possible to find peak chart positions on the irishcharts.ie website, but of course it's not possible to use the template for this - at present the entry has to be inputted 'manually'. Do you think there is any chance of the irishcharts.ie website being incorporated into the template in future? To be honest I don't think it's going to be that easy to do, there's no way of telling which week a song reached its peak chart position, for example. Richard3120 (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
What is going on with File:Lady Gaga Fame bottle.jpg? This image did not come from the Haus Laboratories website; I remember it previously being uploaded to Commons. Why was it removed there and added here? It is not a non-free logo or packaging; it is the actual product. –Chase (talk / contribs) 16:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted my edit to the Taylor Swift 1989 album page yesterday. I had added some info about the leak, including a link to a reliable source (Vulture). You reverted it claiming WP:UNDUE, which demands that an article "represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources." I don't understand why my information fails to meet this criterion, since articles ran in a number of prominent reliable sources yesterday about the leak:
If WP:UNDUE asks that an article should reflect the prominence of each viewpoint in reliable sources, I don't understand why a discussion of the leak fails to count, since it is obviously a significant part of the public discourse about the album.
Dd42 (talk) 21:34, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For your many wonderful articles and other contributions to Wikipedia. Your ability to keep up with information about current releases and update articles accordingly (currently, I am impressed with Cheek to Cheek) is remarkable. Keep up the great work! --Another Believer (Talk) 00:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lush Life. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello IndianBio:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Eau-de-Gaga-bottle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The Mary Kom article reads like a promotional feature, doesn't it? -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
You are saving the article from what? Huh! You are doing what you do the best, disturbing me. And, now I just saw this section discussing, which was started by Krimuk. You must have told me and not Bio! What do you mean by Komercial? The film was a hit and acclaimed too. Though everyone has a different opinion. I agree, the wow factor was missing as it was no million dollar baby. Bollywood is Bollywood and will never meet Hollywood. The wow factor was Chopra, who gave an earnest performance.—Prashant 14:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi IndianBio, thanks for calling my edit a good faith edit. It was! I read that the Template:External music video is to be put in the "Misc" section of the template. In this way it's easier and faster to go to the official video of the song. I saw that some singles have the link to the video in the template and others in the EL. Wouldn't it be easier to have just one place? In my opinion the template is a better place because I think that the video is an important characteristic of a single, not just and "external link". --Teoamez (talk) 13:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi The website MadonnaTribe interviewed Billy Steinberg concerning the Italian nun's version of "Like a Virgin". Do you think that it's worth adding to the song's article? Amzer (talk) 17:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Can you keep an eye on him/her who may added unsourced genres on some Maroon 5 wikipages, including It Won't Be Soon Before Long. 115.164.91.137 (talk) 13:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Hey IndianBio, how's going? About the best-selling albums in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began you've recently updated, I noticed a minor miscalculation regarding Whitney Houston's album (number 6). Comparing the numbers from the 2013 and 2014 list, you'll see that her album sales have shrieked for 45,000 copies, which is not possible. Can you double check this?--Retrohead (talk) 09:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
In the Charts section of Roar (song), the link for the UK Singles (Official Charts Company) #1 position does not work (page not found). I think this is the proper link, but I have no idea how to replace the wrong link (I'm unfamiliar with that referencing style). The same problem occurs with Scotland but I cannot find the Scottish chart to give you the right link. At least please replace the UK link. Thanks! Dontreader (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Cox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Love Won't Wait you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
The article Love Won't Wait you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Love Won't Wait for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 19:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
The article Madonna: Like an Icon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Madonna: Like an Icon for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The article Madonna: Like an Icon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Madonna: Like an Icon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 22:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The reason why I reverted the tour page was just to add more dates, and a source from USA Today just so that info could be there stored. Then put back the re-direct. Have a good day ~ HappyAppy10
Following the NFCR discussion I have opened a DR at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 November 19#Lady_Gaga_vidcaps. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nature Boy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 14:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Nature Boy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nature Boy for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Nature Boy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nature Boy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Madonna: Like an Icon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 19:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
I only ever made one incorrect edit. Don't go one my page and scold me for "disruptive" editing and threatening to ban me. I've done more than my fair share of good work on this site, so don't go around and take one incorrect edit as a reason to ban me. ~ shy1520
Please let me know how my corretion about the artRAVE stage is incorrect? The stage building at the artRAVE [3] is reminiscent to Mount Olympus from Hercules [4], not Atlantica from The Little Mermaid [5].
It is you who is vandalizing that page by deliberately removing correct information, and I notice it isn't the first time. At the top of your talk page, there is a section named "Lady Gaga", and quoting the author, "I only ever made one incorrect edit. Don't go one my page and scold me for "disruptive" editing and threatening to ban me. I've done more than my fair share of good work on this site, so don't go around and take one incorrect edit as a reason to ban me". I have to ask you to stop this foolery, and get your facts straight. Squidoh (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)