An article you recently created, Vasil Terziev, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I submitted it and it should be suitable now. Jorkdkskakaksjjsk (talk) 17:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vasil Terziev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Jorkdkskakaksjjsk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vasil Terziev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasil Terziev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  22:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Democratic Bulgaria, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boyko Rashkov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from bg.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 07:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Solomon Passy, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited 2024 European Parliament election in Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MEP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Jorkdkskakaksjjsk. Thank you for your work on 47th National Assembly of Bulgaria. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Andrey Kovatchev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Higgins.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berov Government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union of Democratic Forces.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Jorkdkskakaksjjsk. Thank you for your work on Petar Kulenski. Chaotic Enby, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Passes WP:NPOL as a former congressperson, but it would be good to have more reliable sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Chaotic Enby)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 19:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]