Natedawggg84 (talk) 01:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC) Hello this is Nathaniel Benjamin aka Natedawggg84 requesting that you please undelete Reverend Dr. R.R. Wilkinson page so I can retrieve my editing work. I made a mistake trying to rename my username Rev. Dr. R.R. Wilkinson and accidently created a new page. Now all my work is gone. I spend a lot of time creating and editing it and I was nearly finished. I apologize for any violation I may have caused in doing so. I had no idea what I was doing. All I ask is for you to retrieve my work so I finish for publication. Thank you.[reply]

You made a page about him on your user page and it was not related to building an encyclopedia. The best place for it were for you to create it in your sandbox, draft namespace, or if your an auto confirmed user, the main space. If you wish to retrieve it, please contact Fastily on his talk page.

Kaseng55, how could you tag this article draft for deletion? Clearly, it should not have been on a User page but you should have simply moved it to a Draft page instead of tagging it for speedy deletion. How could you look at this page and not see that it was an article draft which is exactly related to building an encyclopedia? Sheesh. We should be encouraging and helping content creators, not deleting their efforts. And, you've been here almost 3 years, you should know to sign your posts. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I thought only administrator can do that, that is the reason why. Kaseng55 (talk) 02:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at WP:ANI, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Wish Twinkle and RedWarn had the option to report user to ANI and other noticeboards. Kaseng55 (talk) 02:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

need independent reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Solar Cargo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Solar Cargo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 16:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaseng55! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 16:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kaseng55, I hope you are doing well. I have noticed that you have recently started adding comments to sockpuppet investigations; unfortunately, I have to tell you that those comments are less than helpful: Here, you were feeding a troll, here, you commented in the wrong section (and possibly forgot to log in?) and "voted" in a process that isn't a vote without adding much of substance, and your comments here frankly demonstrate a lack of insight into the filing. This isn't the first time there have been issues with your sockpuppetry-related conduct ([1][2][3][4][5]) and since you have never engaged with any of these concerns, I feel the need to be blunt: Your conduct in sockpuppetry-related matters is disruptive, and you need to step away from the area – at least until you have more thoroughly familiarised yourself with related processes and policies. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thank for letting me know. And no, that anonymous user is clearly not me. Personally, the SPI case look similar to a court case. Kaseng55 (talk) 22:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you said “Cleary WP:NOTHERE”?. I don’t know what you say “WP:NOTHERE”. I just figured out that both user account are as sockpuppet and let administrators know what got evidence. 65.60.242.118 (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet is also WP:NOTHERE Kaseng55 (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaseng55: ZiggeZagg3/2? Me? I confused, as you comment to. Why you supporting me? 65.60.242.118 (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not you. It's ZiggeZagg3/2 Kaseng55 (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]