This user may have left Wikipedia. Landon1980 has not edited Wikipedia since August 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Since Beastly's filming is soon to begin, I kinda need your help on reviewing this which I created on my sandbox. Beastly. Thanks a lot. Kikkokalabud (talk) 10:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a simple dream. To correct errors and fully develop the pages in our hallowed Wikipedia. Please do not crush that dream, sir. PLEASE DO NOT CRUSH IT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.88.228.158 (talk) 06:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Is User:Very serious editor blocked yet? --The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For all your hard work fighting vandals as well as beating me to 3+ reverts tonight. T'Shael MindMeld 07:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
"she ain't got shit on me" is the new single from letoya . it wont let me edit it on the discography and sending me warning. source www.letoyaonline.com and http://www.rap-up.com/2009/05/14/letoya-luckett-hints-at-album-guests/
Sorry, I thought you were vandalising for some reason, go ahead and make the edit. Sorry again. Landon1980 (talk) 07:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
it wasn't vandalism, put it back in. trolling conservapedia is like putting a 9volt battery to your tongue, or writing silly answers on a serious test. everyone does it once so they can talk about it later.
This user has already made a number of bad edits. I suggest that you watch this editor. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 10:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't revert again. I'll do it for you. Piano non troppo (talk) 10:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
This title is wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.226.210 (talk) 10:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I already sent him to ARV for removing templates after warnings. He'll be blocked soon. Ridernyc (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Haha, well, I am flattered that someone would choose me as their scapegoat in stalking you. You, in turn, should feel flattered that someone thought you worthy of being stalked!
To answer your question, no, I didn't understand. In fact, I went back through all of our disagree-ing and agreeing conversations that I could find, and I couldn't understand what would make you so angry as to categorize our conversations as you had. As for the misunderstanding, no problem/apology accepted/and I apologize as well for any of my comments or actions that might have irritated you. Have a great day! Wikiwikikid (talk) 14:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Unfortunately, my RFA was closed recently with a final tally of 75½/38/10. Though it didn't succeed, I wanted to thank you for your support and I hope I can count on it in the future. Even though it didn't pass, it had a nearly 2 to 1 ratio of support and I am quite encouraged by those results. I intend to review the support, oppose, and neutral !votes and see what I can do to address those concerns that were brought up and resubmit in a few months. If you would like to assist in my betterment and/or co-nominate me in the future, please let me know on my talk page. Special thanks go to Schmidt, MICHAEL Q., TomStar81, and henrik for their co-nominations and support. — BQZip01 — talk |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
For repeatedly de-vandalizing by repeatedly vandalized user page. Thanks! — Aldaron • T/C 05:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for reverting the Vandalism to my page--SKATER Speak. 05:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
I really cant be bothered monitoring the unconstructive edits on high school pages!!! Earlypsychosis (talk) 06:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
This isn't vandalism. All he was doing was adding a ((hangon)) tag to contest his article's nomination for speedy deletion yet you reverted and issued a warning. Authors of articles are allowed to contest speedy deletion, just not supposed to remove the speedy tag. No big deal, just be careful. :) --T'Shael MindMeld 06:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that 69.107.48.207's edits to the Summer Olympics articles are legit, if not well explained. Somehow the Philippines replaced China as the primary medalist, which if memory serves, was not the case. I'm going to track down who made the initial edits. You might want to remove the warning from that IP (unless it's done other edits that are vandalism). [By the way, I don't blame you for the revert. I almost reverted the IP back again, but paused to consider it more]. Shadowjams (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
(ec)::No, I don't know how I reverted that, that edit definitely isn't vandalism. I'm still getting used to huggle, I bet I was looking at a revision that was vandalism while huggle had not yet caught up, so I inadvertently reverted the wrong person. I removed the warning and left them a welcome message. I really appreciate you letting me know, otherwise I would have most likely not found my mistake. Thanks again. Landon1980 (talk) 04:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
No problem. I've gotten nasty messages from people before for doing the same thing (doing good faith vandalism patrol but making a mistake, or having my software make a mistake) and I don't want to be one of the nasty ones, but I do want to make sure that I'm not missing some bigger picture. Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 04:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Just because you revert vandalized pages on an internet site doesn't make you a hero of any description, my friend. You'll soon learn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.232.66 (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Who are you to be giving out warnings? Are you a Wiki Cop? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.8.14 (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
..but please accept this:
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For all your help controlling the nonsense that 조커 created. T'Shael MindMeld 07:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for the vandalism revert to my talk page. » skraz talk,contribs 18:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. Abce2|AccessDenied 04:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I reverted a mocking edit on this user's talk page. This is after you gave him a Level 4 Warning--The Legendary Sky Attacker 05:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
And now he's blocked. It's was nice working with you to stop him. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 05:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
The guy won't give up. We might have another block on our hands. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. But do you think that The Man Who Laughs and Hoo hoo ha could be the same person. They both started vandalising one after the other and they both like the "Why so serious" Joker picture. Maybe we are dealing with a sockpuppeteer. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Also we both worked together to get rid of those two accounts. The first one attacked you and the second one attacked me. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Is there any reason why you reverted this constructive edit as vandalism and then final-warned the article creator? Cunard (talk) 05:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
What did I do you just deleted it without reason?--74.215.92.204 (talk) 02:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I know we don't agree on the issue, but I'm going to let it play out a bit and then call for a consensus. I'm more than willing to accept the outcome of the consensus however that turns out. I hope the editor doesn't change anything until a consensus is reached. Wikiwikikid (talk) 20:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
OH, mistaken idenity. I am fairly new and do some minor updates to help my fav band pages, but since my chem page is locked, i came to my 2nd fav. please fill me in on any knowledge of editing. thanks. Felix 12 22 (talk) 05:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
You've been discussing that User:Felix 12 22 is banned. Where's the ban located at? (edit) please discuss here, not my talk page. tedder (talk) 05:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
(OD)Best I can tell Drew encountered this user while patrolling recent changes, can't be sure though. He is quacking to you and you don't know the half of it. Everything is the same, from the way he writes, to the edits he is making, to how he reacts when called a sock. The username is even similar to the ones he always chooses. I have never had to gather evidence before regarding this user, Seicer was as familiar with him as I am and he always blocked on sight. So now I don't really know what to do. SPI's are such a long and drawn out process that I'd almost rather just forget about it as file one. Raul dealt with him last time and I have asked him to help out again. Landon1980 (talk) 06:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on my user page Showtime2009 (talk) 03:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Ha! Look! More of these! Keep up the good work, fine citizen of Wikipedia. Qsung (talk) 06:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC) |
I take your point about the initial "removal fo sourced material" template. I do find it slightly bizarre however that you then seek to remind me of WP:3RR. I'm well aware of the policy, and to the best of my recollection have never contravened it. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 09:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Could you reconsider your views on the rapcore merger, based on the recently added sources? (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 17:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC))
Hi Landon1980. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic “current events” articles on Wikipedia. I have noticed in the talk page archives at Barack Obama that you have contributed to the editing or maintenance of the article. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below.
Link to the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=P6r2MmP9rbFMuDigYielAQ_3d_3d
Thanks and best regards, Mike Lyons lyonspen | (talk) 14:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
As someone who was involved in previous discussions, please be aware of the current move discussion at Talk:As I Lay Dying (novel), and weigh in if you want. Thanks!--Cúchullain t/c 13:06, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Caffieinebooost (talk) has given you a cup of coffee, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Coffee somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a coffee, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!
Spread the lovely, warm, bitter goodness of coffee by adding ((subst:WikiCoffee)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ban of Sugar Bear/Ibaranoff24. Thank you.— Dædαlus Contribs 00:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment.LuciferWildCat (talk) 05:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
I entered Wikipedia this morning to be greeted with this:
“Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Interstellar travel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 07:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Interstellar travel. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 07:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)”
That was not my edit, and I don’t appreciate being accused of something I didn’t do and having the accusation hidden for over three years.
124.170.116.162 (talk) 21:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)