Hello, Liberalvedantin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> ((cite web | .... ))</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== ((Reflist))
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ram Mandir, Ayodhya seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 06:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
@Tayi Arajakate, the sources used are from The Quint website, twitter account, Huffington Post, Yahoo News India. Which specific source is unreliable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberalvedantin (talk • contribs) 16:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Sharma, a veteran freelance journalist specializing in national security, foreign policy, and Indian political issues, has written for a variety of outlets, including the Quint, Rediff, Firstpost and dailyO, among others. He has also worked for prominent Indian newspapers like the Hindustan Times and Times of India in the past, a Press Trust of India report notes. (Disclosure: Sharma regularly contributed to The Diplomat until 2012.) Between 2010 and 2014, Sharma also wrote a weekly column for the CCP-affiliated tabloid Global Times, the Delhi Police noted in its statement.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 16:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC).
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Newslinger talk 07:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Love Jihad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
New York Times and The Atlantic are not reliable? I do not see in the guidelines how what I added is unreliable? Liberalvedantin (talk) 18:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
I see that the article is full of news sources from The Hindu and Al-Jazeera. I have also used The Hindu as a source. How are those other sources reliable but not the ones I have used? Liberalvedantin (talk) 18:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hinduphobia in Academia. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hinduphobia in academia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hinduphobia in academia. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ―Susmuffin Talk 00:36, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Hinduphobia in academia. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Newslinger talk 10:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Fabrickator, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 10:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hinduphobia in academia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinduphobia in academia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 22:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
For your understanding: the Indo-Aryans migrated to the BMAC,borrowed vocabulary from this culture, but did not mix with it's people. That's why the BMAC left no genetical trace in the Indian population. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
I know this. But the page was missing info about source of south Asian ancestry, which is the theme of that section. Liberalvedantin (talk) 05:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Joshua Jonathan. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Indigenous Aryanism that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This change of wording by you is definitely a personal attack. You brought in "Hinduism" at Talk:Indo-Aryan migrations#Changing it to a theory, I wrote "the system is not very kind for Dalits, is it?" "System" here does not refer to Hinduism, but to the Indian societal system; you equate it with "HInduism." Next you write "Imagine if someone said Islam is a terrorist ideology. Catholicism promotes pedophilia." Those are your comments, not mine. Please refrain from such comments. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Stop spamming my page. Liberalvedantin (talk) 23:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
If you were talking about the "Indian societal system" as you claim, it was a nonsequitor. We are talking about Hinduism. Liberalvedantin (talk) 23:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Doug Weller talk 08:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)