Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
The draft should have at least three objective, reliable sources to establish notability. Also there should be inline citations to show where the statements in the text come from.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barbara Zecchi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barbara Zecchi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Lunaandmaya!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 07:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
Some statements have many details and no references e.g. the lists of universities and film festivals she has been involved with. These need sources for verifiability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barbara Zecchi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barbara Zecchi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Welcome to wikipedia. I have recently been pruning the Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Participants/Active list and was somewhat surprised when you just joined. I had discovered that many of the editors on the list had been inactive for many years and a surprising number had been blocked. Anyway I came over to take a look at who you are and noticed your article that was turned down. Do you know that you do not have to have anyone approve a new article? Make a few changes, add whatever references someone asked for and then just publish it yourself. Carptrash (talk) 16:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Go to the "search" field to the left and enter Barbara Zecchi. You will get a page that says somethinglike "These is no Barbara Zecchi article, would you like to do one?" Then click on the red link - this one here migh work too, and then cut & paste your article in. I notice that she shows up in a few places - maybe as a reference. Go to those and turn her name into a link. That will make connections from other articles to yours, which sort of sews it into the fabric better. Go for ir. Carptrash (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Carptrash Hello Carptrash! done!! I followed your instructions about my article on Barbara Zecchi. Clear and easy. I did get a warning message though: "WARNING: Draft:Barbara Zecchi is 15,654 bytes. This may be a "copy and paste" move.). Shall do something about it? I really don't want to mess it around!!
Many thanks again!! What an awesome welcome to wikipedia!! I'm ready for my second article now! Lunaandmaya (talk) 21:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't forget (if you ever knew) about using these ::: when you answer someone on a talk page. It does the indenting. I'd leave that stuff at the bottom of the page for a week or so and if you don't hear anything, take it away. For your next article just start it like you just did. Wikipedia can be a nice friendly place . . ... or not. Helping new editors is always encouraged because that's where long term editors start. Thanks for the barnstar, that was nice of you. If I can help you with anything please let me know.Carptrash (talk) 22:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ouch. Perhaps you need to start the article again, but as a much more modest one. If that's not your picture, drop it. If you have copied any text, let it go. Just stick with the bare bones and the list of her publications. Please hang in here. Or leave Barbara alone for a bit and do a few edits elsewhere. Maybe some movie stuff. I'm doing some editing there too. Carptrash (talk) 05:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place ((Help me)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Barbara Zecchi with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Barbara Zecchi saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alicia Luna. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alicia Luna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.