|
I've removed your added text again, and placed my reasoning on the talk page. This is getting quite out of hand at this point, and I strongly encourage you to actually discuss this issue rather than just continue with the drive-by reversions that have been happening for months now. siafu (talk) 20:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Mariguld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It seems my user name is still blocked by User:2over0 for mistaking "sockpuppet" with User:Kurtan. I am not expert of astronomy but it is one of my interests, especial if no big bang articles. Seems Kurtan has too, but often end with conflicting opinions of other users. So I try to find good references. The real sockpuppet here seems to be an old long time blocked user who is editing again from several new IP-addresses. Mariguld (talk) 23:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Contrary to what you seem to think, having a common interest in astronomy is by no means the only evidence of a link between the two accounts. There is much more evidence. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mariguld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not informed of what evidence of a link there is, so to show that I understand why you may find some link, I can only guess it is my short edit record. The contact with Kurtan started after I tried to put a translation of my Japanese Masreliez-article on the Swedish wp on 2010-10-06. It was very fast deleted, since a better version had already been deleted in 2006. So I had put myself into the hornet's nest by supporting Masreliez. He presents a full cosmology that adress a lot of fenomena with separate articles. It is very easy to find the articles at issue by following edits of the four IPs that the VanishedUser3,14158 had been using, see edit history of Tired light, where others tried to support Masreliez. I will try to avoid cosmology edit war situations in future. When time permits contibute more on things Japanese and childrens books. The block is not necessary since block reason does not apply to my case. /Mariguld (talk) 12:45 pm, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mariguld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes, Mr Gearloose (talk · contribs) is familiar to me from someof his edits on Swedish WP. Some of them on same articles as I have edited.That is our only connection. I do not know who this guy is, we have nevermet, talked or had any communication whatsoever (except maybe for one or twoinformation edits on WP). What I have understand of the “Checkuser”´s role,it can tell IP-numbers of signed edits. And so find out links between twoaccounts? But I cannot understand when and how “Checkuser confirm sock”here, except that we may have used the same computer somewhere (in Stockholmarea). But he is not me, so there is no big deal? Mariguld (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
So, out of all the computers I would presume exist in Stockholm, you just happened to use the same one as someone whose behavior matches yours too? Sorry, not buying that one. I've revoked your talk page access since at this point no admin is going to be willing to unilaterally unblock, you can contact the Ban Appeals Subcommittee if you feel the need, but I'd advise being honest if you choose to. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
83.251.96.56 (talk) 18:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)