I have noticed that you often cite acharts.us as a source for chart positions, as e.g. you did for A Reality Tour. It is great that you cite a source, but I want to point your attention to the fact that acharts.us is unlicensed and that better, licensed sources often exists. I suggest you read WP:CHARTS for guidelines on chart positions, especially for it's list of licensed sources that are preferred to acharts.us. Thank you and happy editing! – IbLeo^(talk) 20:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Thank you for your help. I replaced the sources on A Reality Tour. Mirrorme22 (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. I can just say, thanks for reacting so promptly to my remark. – IbLeo^(talk) 21:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Louis Theroux: Gambling in Las Vegas, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Theroux: Gambling in Las Vegas until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sven Manguard _Talk 16:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Larry (cat).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 20:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice a number of edits adding in up to date electorate figures to election articles. You may also have seen that Keith D asked for a cite on Barnsley East. Could you give a cite on Barnsley East (UK Parliament constituency) please? I have figures quoting 2010 here, but not December 2010. I'd like to use these figures on List of United Kingdom Parliament constituencies in time.

Thanks. Crooked cottage (talk) 17:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are using the BCE figures, and fair play to you for doing that. Here's my way of saying "thanks". It's a great little task you're doing. doktorb _words^deeds 21:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	for adding up-to-date electorate figures across the project doktorb wordsdeeds 21:40, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your October 1974 map is excellent, far more accurate than the one we had before, thanks 91.110.130.216 (talk) 23:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it took a lot of time and effort to make. Mirrorme22 (talk) 23:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Would it be possible for you to create a new version of File:London plan sub regions (2008).svg using the current definition? There's now a "Central" region. I tried to do it myself, but the way the SVG file is structured was too difficult for me to change.

Many thanks, -- Hex [^t/_c] 11:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hello there, I have created the new map and edited the previous map so they both share the same format and colour scheme. --Mirrorme22 (talk) 14:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mirrorme22,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Clive Grunshaw should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clive Grunshaw .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, -MJH (talk) 20:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mirrorme22,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Stephen Bett should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Bett .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, -MJH (talk) 20:21, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mirrorme22,

I would like to know how to access the geographical data used in your maps of historical UK general election results. I know that boundary commission reports with OS maps showing historical constituency boundaries can be obtained, but I was wondering if it was possible to obtain map coordinates or shapefiles of electoral boundaries. And if so, how?

Thanks, jatd8

Jatd8 (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The Boundary Commission for Scotland have published shapefiles for constituencies from 1950 - 2005 on their website but as far as I know none exist for England and Wales for this period, I mainly used the OS Maps you mention to create the England and Wales portion from scratch. The Vision of Britain website is also very useful for finding historical boundaries. Mirrorme22 (talk) 02:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, the map is now fantastic thanks however just noticed that where you have put Gibraltar on the top left hand corner is right where we put the key in to show the colour of the, Percentages of the vote so can I suggest that Gibraltar gos where you had originally put it in the bottom left hand corner so the space is free once the results are in had originally put it in the bottom left so the space is free for the key once the results are there , however we now need maps of each of local voting areas within the twelve regions. Thanks so much (46.64.70.97 (talk) 17:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Hi :@46.64.70.97: - I've placed the Gibraltar map on the top left hand side as this seems to be the convention on Wikipedia for map insets, I think the colour key clutters the map and confuses the average reader, if you look at United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum, 2011 there is a key below the image in the main "infobox", it seems a bit unnecessary to have it in the map as well. I can copy the regional area maps from the AV referendum article. Mirrorme22 (talk) 18:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair enough, in fact if you wish could you modify the 2011 AV results map to take the key off the map for continuity purposes and yes regional area maps are absolutely identical in terms of England so perfect to copy from apart from the South West Region where Gibraltar this to be added in and also Scotland and Wales needs changing as council areas were not used in the 2011 referendum in those parts of the UK. We also need to create the Results of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016 page to add the relevant maps in. (46.64.70.97 (talk) 18:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC))[reply]

I found the former layout clearer and more useful. Why did you make such a sweeping change without trying to reach consensus in the first place?Zigzig20s (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zigzig20s:, I mentioned on the talk page that I would add a section for organisations that will officially endorse neither side in the referendum, it would have been far more confusing IMO to add a third section "neutral" sub section to each section. I have used the List of endorsements in the Scottish independence referendum, 2014 article as a guide for the new layout of the article as it seems to me to be far clearer to the reader regardless of the neutral section. I will ask for views on the article talk page. Mirrorme22 (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chapel en le Frith Rural District

added a link pointing to High Peak

Municipal Borough of Glossop

added a link pointing to High Peak

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request a blank council area map for Wales not just for the EU referendum but also for the Welsh local government page please as none currently exist.

I request that the borders for the London districts are thicker than the borders shown in the Welsh map above so can that be corrected please.

Please can a new version be made of this map with the addition of Gibraltar for the EU referendum as it is part of the South West Region.

Cheers I hope you can be of help, The match will be needed as soon as possible please mainly for the EU referendum. (46.64.217.156 (talk) 13:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC))[reply]

@46.64.217.156: Hi, I've created the maps and added them to Draft:Results of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016. There is already a map of the principal local government areas of Wales on the Local government in Wales article so I have left that in place. Mirrorme22 (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mirrorme22. Firstly, congratulations on the stellar work on election maps - all very detailed and very impressive. I did, however, pick up one error in the 1987 general election map - you have the constituency of Cheltenham down as a Liberal-SDP seat. Cheltenham went Lib Dem at the following election, in 1992; but in 1987 it was a Conservative hold, with a 4,896 majority. Is there any chance of amending the map accordingly? Debonairchap (talk) 10:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Debonairchap: Thanks for informing me. I have amended the map accordingly. Mirrorme22 (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mirrorme22, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 16:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

((Ivmbox|Hello, Mirrorme22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

Hi, thanks for your image on London boroughs between 1900 and 1965. I am wondering if you could share the original shape file; I study the smell landscape of London, and I would need a shape file to be used with a GIS program. Many thanks!

Hello, Mirrorme22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mirrorme22,

I noticed you made maps of the constituencies of the 1970 UK elections. I am searching for shapefiles for those constituencies, could you share those with me? Many thanks in advance!

Kind regards, Young Opa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Young opa (talk • contribs) 08:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mirrorme22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

Hi, I'm a data journalist at BBC News and I've spent a while trying to find shapefiles or equivalent mapping files for historical UK electoral boundaries. After seeing that you had uploaded the maps to Wikipedia for the elections from 1950-1992, I was hoping that you might be able to help me find them?? Thank you if so! I'm on daniel.dunford02@bbc.co.uk - I've never messaged anyone on Wikipedia before so not sure how this all works... Really appreciate your work! Danieljdunford (talk) 09:31, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Number 57 17:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nine reverts in three hours is completely unacceptable behaviour. Number 57 17:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BassetlawDCLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:MansfieldINNottinghamshire.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Mansfield2007Constituency.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:37, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MirrorMe22. Together with coauthors, we're working on an independent research project that aims to integrate data on historical television and radio coverage with citizen behaviour and preferences. For this purpose, it would be useful for us to have the set of election outcomes you have mapped out on this website as shapefiles. I wonder whether you would be willing to share these with us? Please feel free to reach out by email at g.praninskas@lse.ac.uk if this is the case. Thank you! Gailius (talk) 13:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jo White (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sufficiently notable, see talk.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 17:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]