--Gatoclass (talk) 12:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
My pleasure; I randomly clicked your userpage link when I saw you on my watchlist, and I doubted you wrote that. ;) · AndonicO Engage. 14:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I have to go to class in 2 minutes. Can you see my comments on dk's talk about a suspected sock? I don't have time to fool with this... thanks!!!! Ling.Nut (talk) 05:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome to contribute to a discussion about this block at AN. Blueboy96 16:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I've unblocked User:Admirał Bum since global usernames are swaying our username policies these days and the user has accounts in good standing on other wikis. If I've made a mistake, please feel free to reblock or let me know your thoughts on this. All the best, Gwen Gale (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
--Maxim(talk) 21:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
There is a literal war going on in the UFO article and the talk pages. See recent entries on the talk page. 65.173.105.243 (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 11:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 18:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know as you were the one who originally blocked Kdkatpir2, and because I have recently been involved in a dispute/been attacked by the user in question, meaning it would be improper for me to act, but I believe (a belief shared with another user) that I am me93 (talk · contribs) is Kdkatpir2. For evidence, I refer you to IAM93's contributions, Kdkatpir2's contributions and this deletion log. This looks fairly clear cut to me now AstroHurricane001 has pointed it out, but I will leave it in your hands. J Milburn (talk) 18:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Since you have a mop and keys, might you please address Aaxxll's repeated removal of all citations, references, and footnotes from the Hawayo Takata article? Thanks! - House of Scandal (talk) 03:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Nlu.I want to know your page for what was not updating.I studied history of china by your page.please developed your page i need it. Thank you from Iran —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.197.164 (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Nlu,谢 谢. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.196.133 (talk) 20:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank for your past work,for your great try in Wikipedia.
![]() |
The 25 DYK Medal | |
Twenty five! Well done ... they aren't easy and you have completed in excess of twenty five and they are different! Thank you on behalf of the wiki. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 20:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC) |
I see you blocked 67.79.148.42 for three months. Well, he/she/it is back at it: Special:Contributions/67.79.148.42. Thanks for checking on it. --Jeremy Butler 20:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I've seen you have some knowledge about the subject so please take a look at the Xiongnu article. I just seen that there is an edit war ongoing from jan 2007, started with "An anonymous IP has proposed an addition to the first paragraph of the article suggesting that Xiongnu people may "the progenitors of Turkic peoples." The first paragraph of an article is extremely important and I suggest that this speculative statement not be included unless more reliable WP:RS sources can be found. The sources given do not satisfy this requirement in my opinion... Nposs 05:15, 31 January 2007" as can see more on Talk:xiongnu#Xiongnu_and_Turkic_people. His IP addresses 58.107.54.158, 58.107.52.201. (He vandalise also for ie. the Hun and the Yabgu articles, but in these I didn't take part as yet.) From since time it became ever worse. The matter is that this anon user(s) makes the stand all time, that the Xiongnu is Turks in the first sentence of the article, which is a totally unprovable statement, since the Turks appeared in the Chinese sources first in 542 AD, as we can see in Göktürks article on etimology. So that Xioungnu is Turks is a totally nonsense. Many users have reversed his editions many times to no effect. We have also tried to be NPOV and put a disputed template, until it is resolved, but it was useless too. He deletes all the contrarian opinions all times, and putting back his original. So since you are an admin, please make the article to temporary semi-protection first (at the status of en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Xiongnu&oldid=233911319) or make some suggestion, what can we do against it. Thx, and apologize for taking your time. Dzsoker (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
I have insufficient expertise in the area (I wouldn't say per se "insufficient knowledge" as I have my own opinions based on my studies of Chinese history on this, but am really not an expert) to tell just how speculative the statement is, but it does have speculative parts to it.
More importantly, though, Wikipedia is a cooperative project that relies on people working together, not unilaterally, and reaching consensus by discussion, not by edit-warring. Edit warring is not vandalism, and yet it can be just as destructive as vandalism. What I am going to do is to put a semi-protection on the article. 58.107.52.201, if you have sources that support your proposed language, please cite and quote them in discussion, and I am sure that other editors will consider them. (I will suggest, however, tone down the inflammatory rhetoric. Wikipedia is not about nationalism or anti-nationalism; it's about building an encyclopedia.) --Nlu (talk) 13:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, this may help. And 58.10... come on talk page to continue this discussion there with the others, quote your references' original sentences by word as I'll mine, so we can reach a consensus. Dzsoker (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Slow Motion (Third Eye Blind). Can it be deleted, Nlu? (There are no pages that use the redirect now, and it's an unlikely search item.) Also, hi! :) It's been a while since I've last come by this place. Qwerty (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey, Nlu, it's been a while. I've got problems with an anon user at the Vin Diesel article. He keeps reverting a vandalism. I thought somebody would have handled it by now, but nothing so far. Think you could lend some admin muscle to the argument when you get a chance? Cheers. Gamer Junkie T / C 16:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions! - Mailer Diablo 08:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Ni hao. Thank you for your contributions to China-related articles. I really appreciate your contributions. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
You blocked user 24.70.95.203 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) in January. Yet today I find the IP for this machine, 70.74.100.206 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), seems to be included in this block. I had a similar problem with a different IP blocked last month. Between that time and this I have edited successfully. This is my girl friend's machine and sometimes I don't login if it is a small edit. Why does this keep happening?
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by AMCKen (talk • contribs)
--Gatoclass (talk) 07:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! -- RyRy (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
--Maxim (☎) 19:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 20:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)