This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ok im sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolgtfo (talk • contribs) 22:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
ok thanks again--Lolgtfo (talk) 22:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank for blocking the disruptive editor. Is there any way you could semi-protect the page so IPs cannot edit? It continues to be disrupted. Thanks! --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ[talk] 23:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for helping in that article against that vandal.♥Yasmina♥ (talk) 23:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
For indefinitely blocking the Cleo22 account. His entire editing history from 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 has been to remove sourced background info from biography articles, and nothing else but this. Thank you. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
hello Ronhjones,
i just saw you deleted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_2.0 and the images in it
can i ask why? i see it has something to do with the copyrights of the Masterpiece 2.0 project. this is in fact an art project of me and a friend. i also personally own the url the project is on and the pictures i've uploaded to accompany the article i took myself. can you please tell me how i have to submit it if not like this?
thank you in advance for taking the time to read this and hopefully react
greetings, Baschz Baschz (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
why did you say i vandilized when i did not! omg i did vandalize before but this time i did not and you said this is your final warning? all i did was say "Some polish names are Zamerski and Nagi." whats wrong with that? ummm, yes you did? after i posted that it said that you were giving me a final warning!?
do you like ice cream —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.110.5.208 (talk) 22:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
hi one question did you read this site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence if not read it then u will see that ist false and thats rassistical !! ok bye —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.134.46.216 (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
one question did you read this site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence if not read it then u will see that is false and furthermore rassistical it should be forbidden to post that here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clydet9000 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
y?????????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrvhskid (talk • contribs) 22:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
i think this user should be perma-banned instead of blocked, they have been vandalizing for years, most vandalizers get perma-banned for doing 15-20 vandalism edits, user 169.199.121.2 has done WAY over that. what is your opinion on this? -- ..::Abb 615::.. 23:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Do you mind revoking the talk page privileges for User:203.208.94.226? Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't feel my edit was unwarrented. If you can find a bathroom for under a hundred dollars please do enlighten me as mine needs redoing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.97.201 (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey Ron. I didn't want to post one of those "you're wrong" posts at the help desk (as some do), so I thought I'd just let you know here that subpage drafts should be listed at the uncontroversial section of WP:RM, so if the request is made properly is should take minutes or hours rather than 7 days. See e.g., Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft, the page that is linked for users in the template at the top of a subpage draft created through the article wizard.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
An anonymous user keeps on doing false information in List of programs broadcast by Teletoon Retro a lot of vandalism and insults I suggest the blockage for that one I articulate I erase it and you go back to put it. --Hugo Felix - Messages Here 01:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Please review destructive edits to Teabagging by User:68.25.103.189. -12.7.202.2 (talk) 19:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Hum I'm a bit puzzled by this since the request hasn't been fullfilled...However if you want to do it, simply copy paste
<!--===============DOI================--> #if:(({DOI|))} |(({Sep|,))} ((citation/identifier |identifier=doi |input1=(({DOI|))} |input2=(({DoiBroken|))} )) ))(( <!--============ Misc. Identifier ============--> #if: (({ID|))} |(( #if: (({Surname1|))}(({EditorSurname1|))}(({IncludedWorkTitle|))}(({Periodical|))}(({Title|))}(({TransItalic|))} |(({Sep|,))} (({ID))} |(({ID))} )) ))(( <!--============ ISBN ============--> #if: (({ISBN|))} |(({Sep|,))} ((citation/identifier |identifier=isbn |input1=(({ISBN|))} )) ))(( <!--============ ISSN ============--> #if: (({ISSN|))} |(({Sep|,))} ((citation/identifier |identifier=issn |input1=(({ISSN|))} )) ))(( <!--============ OCLC ============--> #if: (({OCLC|))} |(({Sep|,))} ((citation/identifier |identifier=oclc |input1=(({OCLC|))} )) ))(( <!--============ PMID ============--> #if: (({PMID|))} |(({Sep|,))} ((citation/identifier |identifier=pmid |input1=(({PMID|))} )) ))(( <!--============ PMC ============--> #if: (({PMC|))} |(( #if: (({URL|))} |(({Sep|,))}& ((citation/identifier |identifier=pmc |input1=(({PMC|))} )) |((only in print|(({Sep|,))} ((citation/identifier |identifier=pmc |input1=(({PMC|))} )) ))<!--Should only display by default in print--> )) ))(( <!--============ BIBCODE ============--> #if: (({Bibcode|))} |(({Sep|,))} ((citation/identifier |identifier=bibcode |input1=(({Bibcode|))} )) ))(( <!--============ Archive data, etc ===========-->
In the relevant section of ((citation/core)). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 05:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your recent help with the protected edit requests. I have one small suggestion though. For the edit summary, it would be more helpful to editors to have a brief description of the edit rather than simply "as per talk page" or similar. Cheers — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
The main reason I tagged it is because I wasn't prepared to shuffle through four years of edits. I tagged it mostly to bring attention to it. Think we should complain they're copyvio of us?HalfShadow 00:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Could you please provide a third opinion in the temporary semi-protection of the article 82nd Academy Awards. Gage (talk) 02:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
i have replied to your message on my talk pageDrumnbass100 (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
that was rude to delete my article it was not a test —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.184.141.136 (talk) 23:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your help with the edit warring at Lorna Fitzgerald 5 albert square (talk) 23:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
I see the user is asking to be unblocked though :) --5 albert square (talk) 23:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
It is not vandalism to edit for a reason. Are you/were you User:68.25.103.189? -12.7.202.2 (talk) 23:06, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ronhjones,
When you have a moment, could you take a look at the Judith Butler page? Here is the history: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judith_Butler&action=history It seems like there is a potential WP:BLP issue going on. I made one revert but it seems like a potential edit war so I am stepping back. I wonder if this page needs semi-protection? Thanks, -Classicfilms (talk) 21:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Please see here —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
They are writing vandalism in the I articulate Boomerang (Latin American TV channel) On something future of boomerang 2 which fails to match and please that page in order that they stop blocks insults and insulting and inventing información.Gracias and greetings.
--Hugo Felix - Messages Here 21:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey sorry man. i was just fooling around. Yesterday I wrote stuff about swedish break dancers. You guys are sharp. Sorry to be a nuisance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.1.245.65 (talk) 20:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Whats your problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.31.45.3 (talk) 20:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
... for clearing the garbage from my Talk page. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
I have seen the error of my ways now. I was actually meant to edit your page with that fun fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.248.198 (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Fresh off your block, IP 72.53.86.52 continues to engage in vandalism. A bit tough to follow the extent of it/warnings, as it always deletes (as it is allowed to) warnings it has received. Thought you might wish to take a look, possible. Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, as you weighed in and took action regarding the deletion of an entire talk page comments for article on Mike Fraysse, would you please watch for the same vandalism in the main article (the removal of entire sourced, factual sections), or please advise how to go about requesting such assistance from Wikipedia? I apologize for my unfamiliarity with the procedures to address instances of wholesale information deletion in an attempt to skew the reader's perception of a subject, but nonetheless thank you for your action on the Talk page in question.[1]--Cyclingfansanon (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Can you take another look at this block? Based on [1] it seems that the user is simply blanking their own talk page. Tim Song (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
== User talk:Xbcj0843hck3 ==
Maybe I'm missing something here, but it looks like you and another user got in an edit war with this guy over the content of his own talk page, and then you blocked him for it. Please tell me I am missing something, because on the surface this does not look good. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ronhjones. Without trying to be argumentative, may i ask how you determined consensus on Talk: William I of England? It seems to me that the two main arguments were, "It's better", and "This is what the rules say", and neither of those is especially convincing. (And, yes, i'm quite aware that i used one of those two!) It seems to me, however, that in a situation like this lack of consensus normally means that no change happens is the answer. Again, i'm not trying cause an argument, nor even continue the discussion, merely to find your thought process. Cheers, LindsayHi 07:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
I did not know there was a sandbox mode for Wiki. i will take sandbox into my thought for futher editing practice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.135.172.151 (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Ronhjones. Gowlo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Please I request that they protect the page of Tooncast Because there are insults toward to the canal, vandalism and false information be more than enough Boomerang 2 I suggest the protection of this paginate. For favor this user Juliohfv1 My registered user's name has been imitated a vandal that puts news is false and you go back to put him and insults toward my person I suggest the blockage to imitate my user's name registered.thanks.--Hugo Felix - Messages Here 04:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title. DrKiernan (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC) (Using ((Please see)))
Pleasee see that the text from Fethullah Gulen's talkpage is blanked. It is important information and indicates unacceptable behavior of an editor vandalizing and blanking the article itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.72.81.83 (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Did not want to bother you on talk about this, but since the anon did anyway. Fethullah Gulen has been the target of an extremely determined sockpuppeteer User:Philscirel for the last 2 years. In the last year the page was semi-protected for about 6 months, and the other 6 months has been about maintaining the neutral version against repeated sockpuppet attacks. The latest iteration was in February and Anon:71.72.81.83 was blocked then as sockpuppet of Philscirel. The page was semiprotected for a month, and guess what, the protection expired yesterday. I have asked for a lengthy semi protection and reported the anon editor as sockpuppet. I am now awaiting these procedures to conclude; and will not edit Gulen page, or talk page until then (after which I will reset to the last good version). Cheers Arnoutf (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
I merely altered the spelling from "aluminium" to "aluminum". It was not vandalism. 76.126.21.16 (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey,
I'm assuming it was a bot of yours that undid my edits to s. You should probably take a look at it, my edits were not, in fact, vandalism: the vandal was the editor before me (I have since reverted both our edits, as the version he vandalized also had what I edited in). 75.154.86.103 (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Looks like we might need some protection on Bart Stupak. It seems to be under attack by anons. I have reverted it twice and so have you. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
the internal revenue service is the strong arm of a dictator which is not embodied in one person but in a collection of institutions and agencies
this is the truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.143.129 (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Do u like eggs just wondering —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.12.89.3 (talk) 23:23, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Dude, I didn't changed anything regarding -ise-ize. The only thing I changed was the pronunciation of countach which is clearly wrong and I don't understand the constant reverting when the only thing to do is to listen to the audio file. Then you will see the current version is wrong. soundfile, clearly, there is no voiceless alveolar plosive (t) before the voiceless postalveolar fricative (ʃ). In the Lamborghini Countach article this is already done properly, why is it reverted on Ferruccio Lamborghini? 81.68.255.36 (talk) 10:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Well, believe me or not, I did not change any of that :S I have no idea why it says I did...wait I think I know, I must have clicked on undo or something but I swear I didn't see that he had changed a lot more except for the pronunciation. So sorry for that. 81.68.255.36 (talk) 10:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I am former sulmues, and would like to use now gollomboc. You can user usercheck to verify. I am the same person, Sulmues, with 5.5k edits and 66 articles. Please revert your change in the sulmues page. Unfortunately, I messed up with the script to enforce a wikibreak and can't log in again as Sulmues. --Gollomboc (talk) 00:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
...please stop re-editing my article about DJ Mindfreak and let me finish it first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PoZitive11 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
...yes, of course. I'm new to wikipedia... just let me find and edit some more info. DJ Mindfreak is my favourite musician after Neophyte, and I want that other people can learn about him and his music. I'm reading manuals right now about editing pages... I will not do anything with your tags and all that stuff, just continiue adding information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PoZitive11 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I go to dexter high school, and i know for a fact that are colors are maroon and gold, please change it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.160.250 (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for moving the article. -- Θakster 07:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Ég biðjumst velvirðingar inconvinience en það er gegn trú minni að ekki gera ekki uppbyggjandi breytingar. Skilaboð mig aftur og ég mun breyta vinum í plast skeið.
Blashyrkh (Mighty Ravendark)
The grim and frostbitten kingdoms —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trveicelandicblackmetal (talk • contribs) 22:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Just a quick thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page. Mephistophelian (talk ● contributions) 21:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Gotta cork handy? HalfShadow 19:25, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
A massive thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page.--Welshsocialist (talk) 23:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
How do I get my article title to appear in that little separate box underneath the search bar? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegetabotnik (talk • contribs) 00:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.141.59.105 (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi i would like to inform you about macechap123. he is apparently a vangaurd editor. which is impossible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PwnedByMe (talk • contribs) 14:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
You moved several dozen articlse from Nationality captives in Guantanamo to Nationality detainees in Guantanamo Bay.
Your edit summaries say WP:RM. But I don't see any section in WP:RM for these renamings.
It seems to me that, even if there was a consensus to change the names of these articles so they called the individuals "detainees" not the more inherently neutral "captives" there wouls still remain the choice of the trailing portion of the name. I am very curious how it was decided that the remaineder of those names should be changed to "in Guantanamo Bay". Can you fill me in?
The USA has the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, on a 45 mile^2 parcel of leased land, and it has the Guantanamo Bay detention camps, but the inner half of Guantanamo Bay is Cuban land unambiguously under Cuban administration. I suggest that makes "in Guantanamo Bay" a poor choice of article name.
Could you please direct my attention to where these new names were discussed? Geo Swan (talk) 19:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your recent block of 198.60.1.105 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), you may not have noticed that the IP belongs to a public library, so the vandal is likely long gone. Cheers —DoRD (talk) 22:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For being such an excellent admin. Keep it up, The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC) |
Thanks for the compliment. It's nice to see someone approves - normally the only feedback is negative :-) Ronhjones (Talk) 22:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Should National Gallery (disambiguation) (upper case G) now be deleted or redirected to National gallery (disambiguation) (lower case g), or in fact the latter moved to the former? I would have thought the upper case G would be the best disambig page, as all the articles on the disambig page have the upper case G in the title. Ty 01:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Why did you delete the Page of Threven? I do not understand what was wrong with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyboylou (talk • contribs) 02:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I saw that you added page protection to Talk:Janeane Garofalo ... could you also protect Talk:Rip Torn? The same IPs have been active on both talk pages. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
05-April-2010: This is just an FYI that Template:Rnd is ready for update, to bypass the small subtemplate {Rnd/a} and reduce Convert nesting by 1 more level, against the template-nesting limit. This change should affect nearly 307,000 pages, and drop 307,000 wikilinks to {Rnd/a}, which will become almost unused. See counts in database report:
The full talk-page topics are in Template_talk:Rnd:
Those topics describe the issue & examples. -Wikid77 00:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
You have deleted Yury Laptev and Mikhail Trinoga as being copyright infringements from kremlin.ru. You may or may not be aware that we have permission to utilise Kremlin.ru materials as per http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Kremlin.ru. The permission that I obtained from the Press Secretary to the Russian President is available at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kremlin_authorisation-English.pdf. Can you please undelete those two articles as they are not copyright violations. --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 08:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Dear Ronhjones,
With a great regret, I noticed that you have deleted the page Zuzanna Janin in English, (a twins one of Polish version in Polish Wikipedia, http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zuzanna_Janin). I am trying to create this page / info about one of the most important Polish contemporary artist: Zuzanna Janin. Just the translation from the Polish one.
I put GENERAL info about the artists acctivity, which is acctually used with artists permition all over the world. It is just general info - facts from CV, and you may alway find them "copied". Acctually this is authourised by artists the only CV she accpept and published. So I can only use this. Other interpretation in the case of artist's carier may be just wrong. I expalned it in TALK. But honesly speaking I am not so familiar with internet, well just was thinking that it is some "cultural-info-duty" towards the Polish Contempoarary Art, to well inform people about it and fill this gap.
So I have decided to create the English version of Polish one about Zuzanna Janin, couse I meat the real curiosity about artists with other art-lovers and we couldn't find the English info about artits.
How differently you can write about exhibition's titles and places / names of Museums and Galleries in which the artists took part? We shoul use this general info. What do you suggest? Maybe we can put it as a TRANSLATION of the existing Polish page, which is acctually in use already 5 years or so. this a copy about the history of artists CV from only public domain resources, which can be copied without permission. but even that I have an artists permission for using this CV as authorised by herself.
there is athe same in Polish on:
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zuzanna_Janin
and here: http://lokal30.pl/zuzanna__janin
thank you for your help, Z. B. Baranowska / lokal_30 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lokal30 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
While living as young lad in El Rocko, Mexico, I was a youthful playmate of Mr. Akers and have intimate knowledge of his past. However, I have recently fallen out of touch with Davido and am not aware of the falsehood of his statements regarding his past. This however, is the truth, and I would ask that you refrain from editing history the way it actually happened. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.175.133.217 (talk) 22:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Listen to me, douchebag. I'm being very serious about my shit on nano-thermite. Nano-Thermite is a non-existing thing. It's bullshit that the Danish scientist, Niels Harrit (Termit-Niels) came up with, because he needed media attention, so he could sell his shitty book about a non-existing product. Do your goddamn research. Termit-Niels is nothing but a wrecked homeless.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:87.113.38.175&diff=cur
Read WP:PROFANE - "a profanity should either appear in its full form or not at all; words should never be bowdlerized by replacing letters in the word with dashes, asterisks, or other symbols.". Put it back. - 87.113.38.175 (talk) 22:20, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
You won't be able to login to Huggle for a while, due to a recent change in the login system. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 01:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: User talk:TheCarterVI. I noticed you gave the final warning, looks like he's still not getting the message. Shall I do the honors? ;) -- Ϫ 08:58, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm puzzled as to why you're reporting users to WP:AIV when you're an admin so can do the blocking yourself? Are you doing them by mistake or wanting a second opinion or...? Peter 19:38, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the message Ron. I don't know the protocol for suggesting changes on a page, but reading the page Fossil Fuel phase out it's clear that it is not encyclopedic. I thought the way to flag the page was to drop a subst:prod tag at the top, and explain why I tagged it that way.
You suggested the Talk page in order to discuss changes. In fact I contributed an in-depth explanation as to what was wrong with the page. But that talk page is dead, no one visits. The article has been flagged for improvement since March 2009, and nothing is changing. Beyond that, I took one step back and realized, the page is not encyclopedia material anyway. The page is a call to action, a statement of advocacy, not an encyclopedia entry.
Please advise on the appropriate Wikipedia steps. I still think the page itself should be scrapped and fragments might be appropriately moved into the page for Coal. (I noted this in my subst:prod|reason .
I don't know the protocol for exchanging messages either - I'd appreciate it if you could notify me via my ip address, and I will come and read your full reply here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.252.155 (talk • contribs)
The Userpage Shield | ||
For reverting vandalism to my userpage -- Rrburke (talk) 23:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC) |
Hi! I see you have deleted a page made by a sockpuppet. This one: Israel and state terrorism. I never saw the content and it was probably full of POVs, but perhaps the subject is notable as per United States and state terrorism. --JokerXtreme (talk) 07:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I know you probably mean well by that comment, but I have been an active member of wikipedia for several years now, and I do know how things work. I was merely reversing vandalism that people are doing to the article because Greg Wyshynski recently linked to it in a twitter post and joked about vandals changing the info, so of course they are now doing so. All I did was change one line back to the CORRECT information, which is in the article cited as a reference, specifically #3^ "Greg Wyshinski Bio". Blogs With Balls." I was in no way attempting to vandalize that article myself. --Lizzysama (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
For deleting that Bruno mars thing. It was the first time since joining this site a few days ago that I've used speedy delete. PunkyMcPunkersen (talk) 01:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
You reverted my edit to the page Barry Hayles despite the fact it was perfectly constructive? Find that hard to understand, could you explain what I did wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.13.166 (talk • contribs)
Fair enough but how did you edit it back so quickly
Thanks for reverting my userpage! ^^ GorillaWarfare talk 21:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I was just wondering why you feel the need to have a full protection on Toll roads in Scotland. As you have arranged things, Toll roads in Scotland now redirects to Toll roads in the United Kingdom. What if someone wanted to write about toll roads in Scotland before the United Kingdom was created - you are preventing this page being changed into a full article. Any reason you wish to prevent that possibility? Cheers Fishiehelper2 (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Prees-branch.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Would you mind taking a look at the recent contributions of this editor, please. You issued a 1 month block back in February for converting infobox dates from templates to text and other disruptive edits, and since the block ran out, they've been doing precisely the same thing all over again, to some of the same articles. I'm not quite sure what the editor's problem is, but they obviously don't care to follow MOS guidelines, and they don't care that practically all of their edits have been undone by other editors. Anything you can do would be appreciated. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Good afternoon,
the location I presented for Mt dick is a correct location, the reversion you made put's an ISLAND in the middle of the Mainland of New Zealand not off shore where it ought to be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.11.9 (talk) 21:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Granted about the Tracy thing even though he said it's true and I'll provide a phone number if needed. I didn't realise about the sand box till afterwards but that's why I deleted it, thanks for just throwing that right back at me with out giving me the benifit of the doubt. how ever I was wrong to have jumped to it so quickly with out reading all instructions........................................................
anyway about the cordinate, look at it on a map... and check here, http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:9-dSPM8C8aQJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_outlying_islands+mount+dick&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
if you need anything else then I can get more proof, one thing is for sure though it's not next to Kingston. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.11.9 (talk) 21:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Understand Thanks for your help...
68.230.11.9 (talk) 21:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Bryan
This editor created International Students House, London and it was tagged by me as spam becuase it was non-neutral. It turns out that was because it was lifted from the insitution's website. The author removed the SD tag a couple of times too. However, when they then started to reword the article they kept getting reverted and then you blocked them. I'm not sure that was warranted - they were trying to fix it up. I42 (talk) 21:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I have been editing the Gerhard Pilz page and it is my family that he is destroying. I realize that some of my statements have been editorial in nature and I will try to correct this in the future, but the facts of the case are true and a valid statement on the history of his life. He may have been a great athlete, but the facts remain and they are true. I am seeking to have his coaching status pulled by the FIL and am also contacting his sponsors to ask that they stop their funding of his team on the grounds of a lack of moral turpitude. How should I go about editing this page, in a non-editorial way? I can provide phone records and emails if that would suffice. I will be contacting the US authorities to attempt to have his travel visa pulled on the grounds of continued harassment, and I believe that these are pertinent facts that should be known about the man. While the fact that Hitler was a painter is of little consequence to students of politics, it is still a valid fact...a bit over the top in the way of comparisons, but it was the first thing that popped into my mind. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.210.59.58 (talk) 22:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
No worries, I saw you had reverted him a couple of times, so I guessed you must have had a technical problem or something. It looks like he won't be back now anyway! :) Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Were you personally watching the Osage page or do you have a bot? There are some pages like Factory that I watch but have missed some bad edits and there's a bunch of work now to restore it to a prior good status. Alatari (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ronhjones!
I saw you deleted the page I created in 2003, Jack Frazier, thinking I had copied it from page, when it's actually the other way around!!! They copied it from us. Go check it for yourself, it says so at the bottom of their page. Their page on Jackie Robinson I noted, was also taken from us.
I appreciate your labor on looking out for copyright violations here, through. We need more people like you!!
Thanks and God bless you! Antonio Ricky Martin's boy Martin 13:10, 22 aPRIL 2010 (utc)
Thanks for the revert on the luge championships and Gehrad Pliz. Really appreciate it. Also, do you happen to know Iain Williams, father of 2010 Winter Olympic women's skeleton gold medalist Amy, by chance? Chris (talk) 13:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
About proposed vandal tagging Immunize (talk) 13:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
A recently submitted article was deleted (rightfully so) and I resubmitted it with changes without changing the original article. The old article keeps coming up. How do I get rid of the old article? The article is ESICE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inyovision (talk • contribs) 20:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I just saw that you deleted the eFront topic at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFront_%28eLearning_software%29 In our option this article refers to an established learning system and made a valid contribution to wikipedia. The deletion reason was due to copyright infringement. The content on eFront wiki is offered according to wikipedias copyright rules "The text of this wiki is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)"
You can check this at: http://docs.efrontlearning.net/index.php/EFrontWiki:General_disclaimer or you can contact me directly for more information since I represent this learning management system as well.
On repeat vandal tagging Immunize (talk) 20:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi
I refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samus_Jay
What do I need to do to obtain this page, as I have received authorisation from the DJ to publish his biography —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.144.40.31 (talk • contribs) 07:08, 28 April 2010
Hello Ron:
I understand that you approved the deletion of Tulay German article for copyright infringement.
The article is a copied with the permission of the author to Wikipedia, so there should not be a problem.
Would you like me to have the author send me an email? Perhaps I can post this in history?
Regards,
Ahmet Toprak
Director, Turkish Radio, San Francisco http://www.TurkRadio.us http://come.to/sunholiday Host, Orient Express http://www.KKUP.org/toprak.html
Listen to us through our archives: http://turkradio.podomatic.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Topraka (talk • contribs) 19:20, 28 April 2010
Hello Ron:
Thanks for pointing me to the article about donating the copyright. It seems quite involved. As it says somewhere else, it may be easier to write my own article.
What if I were to translate the Turkish Wiki page?
Regards,
Ahmet Toprak
Director, Turkish Radio, San Francisco http://www.TurkRadio.us http://come.to/sunholiday Host, Orient Express http://www.KKUP.org/toprak.html
Listen to us through our archives: http://turkradio.podomatic.com
Hello
I changed the Article from Toilet Duck cause Henkel sold it to SC Johnson http://www.scjohnson.de/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=8505 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.223.242.74 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 29 April 2010
so my edit was not accepted--is this a content issue or a technical issue? as the producer/director of the work, I thought it was useful to update the reader on the fact that the documentary was chosen to represent the filmmaker's native country in an international cultural diplomacy program. since this reflects both on the content of the work and the support of InfoAge-- isn't this relevant information?
65.96.36.54 (talk) 21:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC) rj
Thank you for your participation in our attempts to keep Mr. Rodriguez from adding HIMSELF to our town's notable residents. I've skimmed the article's history and seen how the changes came about, mostly. While the 18. IP's have contributed some to the page at large, it is the opinion of myself and several other Burlington residents both present and former, (though I haven't performed any open or random polling of the general population), that he hasn't qualified himself as a notable resident. Given the vast number of people in Burlington who recognize the other names in the list, and then the comparitively few who would recognize Mr. Rodriguez, we feel it unfair to the others mentioned that his name and mini-bio continuously be re-added. Many of us find it in especially poor taste that he is attempting to add his own name to our, if unofficial, history. We would greatly appreciate your continued intervention in the matter. Thank you. BC1121 (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)