![]() |
Hi Scottish12345678! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Foreign relations of Mexico with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Foreign relations of South Korea may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Foreign relations of South Korea may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Foreign relations of South Korea may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:43, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:50, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I notice you've been doing a lot of good work on the Foreign relations of South Korea article and others. Thanks for that.
However, you have also been over linking. Adding wiki links to words that are common and/or not related to the topic detracts from the legibility of the article and, just as importantly, leaves the user confused as to which links are significant to the topic, and which aren't. It is also not required to link every mention of a term. Usually the first time it occurs in a major section is enough.
For instance, on the Foreign relations of South Korea article you have linked;
Please read guidelines about linking here. Don't feel too bad, linking is such a useful thing that it's easy to get carried away with it! Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 12:08, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Please do not be put off doing the good work that you are doing on Foreign relations of South Korea. But you need to understand;
Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Foreign relations of South Korea without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits on the Foreign relations of South Korea article? I have fully explained to you why they were done, and yet you refuse to co-operate, explain or discuss any of your edits. If you don't explain why you did them I will revert. Please also note that I am likely to report you for your use suspected use of multiple accounts.
To be clear. What you are reverting to contains;
You do not own this article and you cannot refuse to let others edit it. It is possible for us both to improve this article, and it would be a pity for your efforts to be wasted simply because you cannot co-operate with other editors. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Foreign relations of South Korea. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 04:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 04:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I see that you have created multiple pages about international relations in rapid succession. However, I doubt that any of them conform with the usual practice in writing such articles. I suggest that you read other articles of this kind for reference, and refer to guidelines such as WP:LAYOUT to make them more encyclopedic. Furthermore, it is best that you write in draft space and go through the AFC procedure so that the articles are reviewed and properly developed before they appear in mainspace. Please reply so that we can try to improve these articles. The Average Wikipedian (talk) 04:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I have (again) performed a clean up of Foreign relations of South Korea. I want to be sure that you understand what I am doing, and again ask you to stop reverting my edits.
--Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scottish12345678, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scottish12345678. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 03:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scottish12345678, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:54, 15 November 2015 (UTC)