Hello! Given your interest in the railway, I decided to ask. No Do you have a desire to write an article about the Argentine armored draisin Pagador Blindado PE-1? It would be great! --Лукас Фокс (talk) 15:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, SegataSanshiro1. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Paul Singer. Thank you. --FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello there! I've noticed there's no en. article on SOMISA. Would you like to create one together? Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 03:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
As far as GA criteria go, I have come up with the following points we need to approach:
Ok, I've gone ahead and synced the articles. We should probably work quickly to solve the "citation needed" parts and in particular the culture section which still needs the most work. With the former editors, I realise that's the case, but I'll have a quick scan to see if there's any past active editors who made substantial edits and message them anyway. SegataSanshiro1 (talk) 20:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For your admirable proposal to improve the Subte article and the progress we've made so far! I can now say I'm more knowledgeable on the matter. I look forward to further collaborations down the road. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 00:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC) |
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Paul Singer. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi SegataSanshiro1, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — Earwig talk 01:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello there! I just wanted to let you know I've made the edits we agreed on. Please let me know if I missed anything. I've also closed the RfC given the former. To reiterate, I'm open to further work on the article if you want to collaborate on that too. On another note, it's a shame the Subte article hasn't been reviewed yet, isn't it? I trust it'll be just fine once someone finally picks it up. It looks pretty decent nowadays! Wishing you a fantastic week, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
I moved your request for community review of an RFC close to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Possible_improper_RfC_close; traditionally that's the preferred place for that type of request. NE Ent 22:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Belgrano Cargas y Logística, SegataSanshiro1!
Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Write a helpful note for SegataSanshiro1. It will be posted on their talk page.
To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Paul Singer (businessman)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 June 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 20:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Paul Singer (businessman), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 09:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
if you have been doing this a while and are still patiently showing up to comment without calling names then you really deserve one of these :) I can't do this any more myself though, heh. I am feeling quite uncivil at the moment.
Elinruby (talk) 01:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC) |
If you feel ever an urge to look at a different set of problems, come help me with the Spanish-language stuff on Panama Papers. There were some really nice stories that I couldn't do justice to or be not sure I would get get right, because ya, the whole article ALL dealt with derogtory information about living people and we had a lot of BLP deletionists through there at first. I got a lot of experience pointing out that public person exception.
I just noticed when I was looking up Singer (cause I knew I had seen him in the Cong but couldn't remember where.) that a couple dozen new Panama Papers stories were recently published so I'll probably be reworking the mining history of Africa again or something. Anyway, be well and thanks for your kind words. Elinruby (talk) 01:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
As I can see in CIA's factbook, the official map of Argentina, has no claims. It's sad that we use territorial claims map as the official map of a country... P.S. I do not come from a country which has to gain anything from Argentina's territorial claims, I'm just a user who tries to find logic in things around him! :) Texniths (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
You should check out Wikipedia's map policy if you can find it and check out Wikipedia:Systemic bias. Personally though, I don't think the Antarctic claims should be on there, even if there is a permanent population, considering the Antarctic Treaty actually forbids any country from really owning it anyway. Anyway, I notice you're farily new here, so welcome to Wikipedia! 15:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)SegataSanshiro1 (talk)
Hello, SegataSanshiro1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 21:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, SegataSanshiro1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for summarizing and cleaning up the disapppearence section in the boat's article. In your last cleanup I think that some of the removed info is useful and should have been kept, especially the map. Unless you have any concerns I'll manually reintroduce some of it. Regards, DPdH (talk) 22:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Calvin Cheng shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 20:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Jytdog (talk) 20:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Regarding your edit summary for this [1] edit, yes, it is now, but it wasn't today in the morning when I reverted the changes as unsourced.--Jetstreamer Talk 23:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Segata, thank you for your message.
Yes, you are right, I didn't notice the CDD3 serial on the locomotive, but sure it looks identical to the CKD8. I also wanted to write something about the DMUs of the Belgrano Sur, but I'm well aware of the lack of information. I only have this article and this one, if you don't understand spanish let me know, I can help you.
Have a nice day.--BugWarp (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, SegataSanshiro1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Segata, I saw your good work to make sure that Paul Singer is exposed as vulture capitalist. I tried to add this important detail in other articles too. But they blocked me. Can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by S2dHa Moo (talk • contribs) 18:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Template:Line P (BA)/Stations has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)