Welcome to Wikipedia, TMProofreader! Thank you for your contributions. I am ToBeFree and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type ((help me)) at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, TMProofreader, on List of stars on the Hollywood Walk of Fame you removed the special stars without any explanation other than "The Screen Actors Guild (or whoever) does NOT belong on the Hollywood Walk of Fame!" You may not think they belong on the Walk of Fame, but they're there, so they should be included in the list. Trivialist (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Sesame Street are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 19:32, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate. Many thanks for your contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.208.153.96 (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's an easy mistake to make, but since "is" is a verb, it's capitalized in titles. —Chowbok ☠ 02:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason you are changing these specific Wikilinks to general ones? Please get consensus to do this on the individual articles' talk pages, at a minimum; if there are valid specific articles for individual years in which the Academy Awards were presented, there is no good reason in my view (or, likely, most other editors') to change the Wikilinks to those of the Academy Awards generally. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus? What consensus? --TMProofreader (talk) 17:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're redirects. --TMProofreader (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to this template, you might find this script useful as it highlights the redirects. Schwede66 18:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by that? --TMProofreader (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your edits, here. I was under the impression, per MOS:NUMERAL, that values one through nine were to be spelled out, like they were before your edit. Is there something special about a number of awards that dictates they should be numerical in the body text of this article?
Thanks for any insight you can provide. Elfabet (talk) 20:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]