Jessica Hung Han Yun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hi TheaterLove, see WP:ABOUTSELF for using websites or other media published by the subject of an article. I removed Jessica Hung Han Yun's website from the article as it cannot be used to support claims about awards, etc. However, I was able to find appropriate sources so added them instead. Also, I suggest expanding it with reviews of her work (i.e. what critics said about her/her work). For Wikipedia, the key is summarizing what other reputable sources have said about a topic, not only chronicling what the subject has done. See also WP:Writing better articles for additional guidance. If you ever have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 16:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Interviews are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability and the award nominations are not enough to meet the the notability guidelines for artists.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tingying Dong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, TheaterLove!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add tables listing creative/crew in theatre articles. The director, choreographer and other notable (blue-linked) creatives should be listed in the Productions section in a sentence (not a table). Also, cast tables should include only productions that (1) have been described in the Productions section, and (2) are long-running, major-market productions. Thank you! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As i have said in the discussion on the theater page;
I understand that Wikipedia has a commitment to maintaining consistency and accuracy across its pages, but I'd like to present a compelling argument for the addition of a creative team table to theatre articles.
Dynamic Information Representation: Theatre productions often experience revivals and changes to their creative teams. This fluid nature of productions means that the individuals involved may shift multiple times over a play's lifespan. A creative team table would provide a clear and concise way to document these changes, allowing readers to see the evolution of a production at a glance.
Relevance and Reference: Names of directors, designers, choreographers, and other creative team members are frequently cited in reviews, scholarly articles, and media. Including them in a table format will not only align with the way this information is often presented in industry-specific publications but also make it easier for readers to connect the information to external sources.
Consistency with Other Entertainment Pages: Wikipedia often includes tables and detailed information on cast and crew for film and television pages. Implementing a similar structure for theatre would create a more uniform approach across different forms of entertainment.
Adherence to Guidelines: I have thoroughly reviewed the Wikipedia guidelines and have not found a specific rule that prohibits the inclusion of this type of information. I believe this proposal is in alignment with Wikipedia's broader goals of providing comprehensive and easily accessible information.
Cooperative Development: I value the community-driven nature of Wikipedia and do not wish to make these changes unilaterally. Instead, I propose that we work together to find the best way to integrate this information, respecting the collaborative spirit that Wikipedia encourages.
To initiate this process, I would like to ask for guidance on how to formally submit this suggestion. Is there a specific forum or discussion page where I can present this proposal to a wider community of contributors? Your assistance in guiding me through this process would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for considering this addition to theatre Wikipedia pages, and I look forward to collaborating on a solution that serves the interests of both the Wikipedia community and its readers. TheaterLove (talk) 07:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, WP:NOT a newspaper or a comprehensive reference work. These tables decidedly do not belong in the theatre articles. Please keep the information in a concise narrative format. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Raydann was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tingying Dong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, TheaterLove. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tingying Dong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, TheaterLove. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tingying Dong".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. LizRead!Talk! 04:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]