Archives

Index 1, 2

Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Schnitzer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Schnitzer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 16:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop creating bad quality articles. Its disruptive! Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sportsfan 1234 please indicate more clearly any issues. Just a reminder you have been banned twice in the past for bad behaviour on Wikipedia. Thanks for you help in creating a great Wikipedia, but a reminder to do it politely and through correct protocol. Cheers, Words in the Wind(talk) 22:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would say that Sportsfan 1234's calling of your work as "horribly written" / "disruptive" is a bit of an exaggeration, but do note, Words in the Wind, that sports biographies should pass WP:SPORTCRIT to be in mainspace, i.e., they should have at least one piece of significant coverage listed. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BeanieFan11 yes I always strive to meet notability as I have over the past 15 years of editing on Wikipedia. If something is in question I am happy to address it. 😊 Words in the Wind(talk) 22:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]