Welcome!
Hello, Yaron K., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme))
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Budgiekiller 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
hello yaron. you look like a great editor, but on the subject of Discourse DB links - please stop adding them. if you read WP:EL#Links_normally_to_be_avoided, you will see number 12 says: 'Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors.' i've checked the recent changes of the wiki, and it takes around a month to rack up 500 edits for the entire project; this does not demonstrate stability and substantial numbers of editors. perhaps when their user base is stronger adding their link to certain EL sections would be appropriate, but for now it just isn't. if you have any other questions about this, please ask Wikipedia talk:External links about it. they are a great resource and very helpful when it comes to concerns. cheers. JoeSmack Talk 02:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Was a bot used to delete all links to http://discoursedb.org ? If so, it may be a violation of some wikipedia guideline. Because I don't believe one can make blanket blocks of all links to websites such as http://discoursedb.org
Wikipedia:External links is a guideline not a policy. So deletions of external links should be left to the discretion of the talk pages for the articles. It looks to me like http://discoursedb.org pages are basically directories. We allow external links to directory pages such as those at Open Directory Project. Of course each directory page has to be judged on its own merits. --Timeshifter 23:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you prodded the subject article; however, it is ineligible for prod due to being discussed at AfD in 2006. I have opened an AfD and copied your original deletion rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techwiki (2nd nomination). —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Yaron, How are you i want to know why you find my content bad or something like this , i want really to know your opinion ?? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed Fouad(the lord of programming) (talk • contribs) 18:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Yaron, Albums are only notable once surfactant information is known such as the title, release date, track listing etc.. However because not all of this information is not present and only the album title can be confirmed by one reference, this article is not notable, and should be deleted unless more information and references are added. Thanks Freshpop (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
There was no consensus to delete the content, so if you want to boldly merge and redirect please be sure to actually merge the relevant content into an appropriate section of Patch (computing). Steven Walling • talk 19:42, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Yaron. You added the "notability" tag to the article Ourproject.org. I have improved the article, added additional references, and update several parts. I'd like you to inform me if that's enough to support its notability and remove the tag, or I should work more on it. Thanks a lot. --Samer.hc (talk) 18:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Yaron, there's currently an ongoing discussion about splitting the Stop Online Piracy Act page at Talk:Stop_Online_Piracy_Act#ONGOING_DISCUSSION_-_Splitting_the_Article. You've familiarized yourself with the entry before, and your insight and perspective on the matter would be appreciated. Hope to see you there, Sloggerbum (talk) 00:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Hackathon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social gaming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
....a page your proposed for deletion, and which was duly deleted. The PROD was contested at WP:REFUND, and, according to policy, had to be restored. Lectonar (talk) 08:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wizards of OS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard of Oz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I deleted the article a bit early for This Space. From what I can see, the original editor was the only main contributor to the page and they tried to blank it a few times in the past, so I just speedied it as a user request. I left the original rationale up in the deletion summary as well just in case anyone tries to ask for it to be restored. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 18:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Yaron K.
"Removing all or significant parts of a page's content without any reason" is vandalism. That is what you have been doing in list of 3D animation software.
Even if meant well, it should by now be clear that your change is contested. You need to achieve consensus for it first. I recommend WP:DR for fastest results.
—Codename Lisa (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
It appears you are well aware that another editor (that's me) has contested your edit, yet you disregard Wikipedia:Editing policy and continue to try to redo the destruction. That means you are now engaged in edit warring. If you continue, you may lose your editing privileges. I advise you to proceed with WP:DR instead.
I see that you have several times said "there was no content removed". This is not true. Either you do not know that you are deleting content (in which case you must assess what are doing) or you know (in which case you are a liar). The primary requirement for any dispute to be resolved amicably is to acknowledge the nature of the dispute.
—Codename Lisa (talk) 14:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe a single licensing term was deleted - can you point to one?Yes, I can. Art of Illusion. Do I need to point to two? Also, in some cases, you mislabeled them. For example, Photoshop has become a trialware while it is in fact a software as a service trialware. When you refactor stuff, details are often lost.
readability, and room for more info. These are weasel words. You are giving an illusion of saying something meaningful while you are saying nothing. Both your version and the other version have ample horizontal and vertical room. If anything a table is more expandable. And "readability"? Do you even know what this word means? "Readability is the ease with which a reader can understand a written text." Not matter where you put the word "Photoshop", in a table or a bulleted list, the readability is unchanged.
As to Photoshop - is it [...] no longer available as a standalone application?What? When did I say that? To be available as a standalone app means to be available outside a larger offering; i.e. a software suite like Adobe Creative Suite. (I know this is the second time I am correcting you but how can I understand you if you use the wrong words?) Software as a service entails periodical payment as opposed to the commercial one-time payment scheme. A traditional trialware stops working at the end of the trial period. A trialware as a service continues to work but the user's credit card might be automatically billed.
Again, please be civil."Again"? Also, I did none of those things in my last message. Of course, if it helps, I grant you've demonstrated the ability to stop doing what is disputed and discuss. This is a quality worthy of appreciation. (No sarcasm intended.) Also, I did correct you twice, which is very uncivil in a classroom, but is the essence of editors' relationship in Wikipedia.
It appears we have pinned the problem: The article has lost its resolution about licensing term;—Codename Lisa (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
you strongly believe this is not an issue while I strongly believe it is."
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipixel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipixel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 08:53, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Yaron K.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Yaron K.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Yaron K.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)