The result was Delete - there wasn't a clearcut consensus or knock out blow as to the notability of the film, but there are concerns raised by the lack of third party sources avaiable for this film. Aside from that, one of the keep advocates may be a single purpose account and another is very well known for being an ultra-extreme inclusionist. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable conspiracy video. Previous afd's resulted in no concensus. --Peephole 14:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep Well known commercially published work.--Pussy Galore 02:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Indefinitely banned user for trolling[reply]