- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Aero Gorda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tiny, non notable airline. Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Safiel (talk) 20:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH; only finding passing mentions in sources, such as this. North America1000 22:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -Yup. An airline run by two people in a small island? Nowhere near relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KelseyWill (talk • contribs) 00:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. The article itself even states "No website is known to exist"... which is never a good sign for proving notability. RA0808 talkcontribs 00:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:40, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above Buttons0603 (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Pretty obvious, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH without any further references, website, or information known about a small airliner. Adog104 Talk to me 21:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Tiny airline, fails GNG. Omni Flames let's talk about it 10:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- SNOW Delete as there's nothing at all and I would've considered speedy or PROD instead. Quite unacceptable. SwisterTwister talk 04:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.