The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aerokids[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD without explanation. Concern was: "Fails to meet WP:CORP with no substantial coverage in RS". The claim to be "one of the largest Education organization" cannot be verified from any RS. SmartSE (talk) 12:41, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in independent reliable sources. The only reference provided in the article is a press release and my own searches simply turn up franchising directories and whatnot. -- Whpq (talk) 14:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Financial Express (India) is a notable publication which covers the award of "Most Promising Pre-School Chain in India" to Aerokids Education Private Limited, though it appears not to be The Financial Express which made the award but Praxis Media Private Limited, and the paper is just printing a press release. Praxis Media is a marketing organisation, so it's hard to believe the award was anything other than a marketing exercise. Other than this, I too can find nothing to assert any kind of notability. RichardOSmith (talk) 13:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep The above mentioned issues have been addressed by linking more sources from independent media. And also please note that the award was issued based on the public survey and evaluation by praxis media team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.63.99.233 (talk) 16:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

27.63.99.233 (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep a quick search finds independent sources confirming the notability claim winning the title "Most Promising preschool Chain" and pan India presence. In case the admin still finds any issues, kindly update the article and keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.234.194.254 (talk) 16:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

223.234.194.254 (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep This organization has received lot of coverage in local and national level medias. You can even check their presence in Google maps and search engines. Hence it is notable. Reference links will satisfy wikipedia's policy and guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oviya344 (talk • contribs) 04:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC) — Oviya344 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.