The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alina Dorian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT. Article offers no sources or real claim to notability that sets this model apart from the legions of non-descript others, assuming her credits could be verified. But popular resources like the Fashion Model Directory and Models.com offer no hits on the name and what Gnews returns is all on a doctor of the same name. Google images doesn't even return anything on this model.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 21:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no sources. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, only self-published material on web search and nothing on news search. Favonian (talk) 14:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no evidence of sufficient reliable-source coverage to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca ^talk 14:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 23:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no sources. Zohairani (talk) 18:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.