The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 02:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amalthea (technical summit) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising for a rather recent started series of meetings (started in 2010) by a very recently started university (started 2008). Many sources are not about the summit or are just passing mentions. So besides the advertising, I doubt about notability. The Banner talk 13:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The subject have significant coverage in many reliable sources simply meets general notability guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cutest Penguin (talk • contribs)
• Delete; the article in its entirety reads like a brochure and should be deleted - possibly even G11'd - on that basis alone. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:53, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - majority of references are irrelevant and article is very promotional. Cannot be saved unless by a 100% rewrite. Primefac (talk) 20:10, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:TNT applies. Delete the junk. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.