The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-05 10:43Z

Anti-Jihad International

[edit]

tagged as possibly lacking notability for just under a month, nothing available in terms of independant verification or attention from reputable sources. seems like a web-based organisation, in which case fails WP:WEB (or WP:ORG if it is otherwise). in any case, nothing to suggest the organisation is even remotely notable. hence, Delete. ITAQALLAH 02:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. ITAQALLAH 02:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per lack of notability and lack of soruces.--Sefringle 02:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. So far, the most notable thing about the site is simply the number of places the link has been placed. Shenme 03:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lack of notability. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Realkyhick 06:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:N. Terence Ong 恭喜发财 08:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable and very few content. Peace. --Nielswik_(talk) 16:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. --- ALM 12:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.cs 21:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator.Bless sins 02:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources or apparent notability. Dragomiloff 19:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.