The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if a decently, reliably sourced article could be written. The Bushranger One ping only 00:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In short, this article looks like a collection of random rambling because:
Fleet Command (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: First and foremost, please stick to standard formatting of AfD. Do not assume ownership of the entire discussion by using a formatting that makes you argument stand out.
Second, I see that you do not deny that this article fails to comply with Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability. But what you do not know is that the fact that you like the article does not make it worthy of inclusion.
Third, those external links refer to entirely different things, not the subject of the article. In another word, they are worthless linkspam.