The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Kumul Rebellion#Battle of Aksu. Sandstein 11:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Aksu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Because this is not a big battle, if there are no more reference.I suggest deleting or merging into Kumul Rebellion#Battle of Aksu.And the content on Kumul Rebellion or Battle of Aksu is equally poor. Witotiwo (talk) 03:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 03:51, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 04:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Short as it is, this page, has information that does not appear in either Kumul Rebellion or First East Turkestan Republic. That is, it is the only page that gives the date of the battle. Thus, per WP:RETAIN, there should at least be no question of deleting this page. However, there appear to be at least two other "Battles of Aksu" one of which, Battle of Aksu (717), has an article and seems rather more notable. Therefore, I propose that Battle of Aksu is moved to Battle of Aksu (1933) and Battle of Aksu (717) is moved to the primary page Battle of Aksu with a suitable disambiguation hatnote. I'm not exactly opposing a subsequent merge and redirect, but the incoming links should still point to the title page in case of subsequent recreation and expansion. I think it unlikely that any battle from the 1930s, however minor, does not have a lot more information out there that could be used, even if it is not immediately available online in English. SpinningSpark 15:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge: Article is much to short and lacking in sources to continue existing as it's own entry, but it does have information not found anywhere else on Wikipedia. I would strongly recommend the merge suggested by Witotiwo.Grapefruit17 (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Tyw7 What does this have to do with Turkmenistan? Turkmenistan is in western Turkestan while Chinese Turkestan is in eastern Turkestan, please learn a little bit about Asian geography. This has nothing to do with Taiwan either. Timmyshin (talk) 19:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Timmyshin, well Republic of China IS Taiwan unless you mean People's Republic of China. I'll remove it from Turkmenistan sorting. Edit: I've edited the article to point Republic of China to Republic of China (1912–1949) --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:51, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. Simonm223 (talk) 18:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.