The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Canesadooharie. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canesadooharie River (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a recorded name used by Iroquois for a river, which has its own article at Canesadooharie. The identity of this river has been disputed, but there were never two rivers (or anything else) called Canesadooharie. Richard Keatinge (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This article adds nothing new that is not already covered article at Canesadooharie. It is a duplicate article that is best deleted. Paul H. (talk) 02:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Canesadooharie, as a plausible title. PamD 08:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.