The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

China-Solomon Islands relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant with China–Solomon Islands relations which redirects to the quite detailed Sino-Pacific relations#Solomon Islands. Not sure if it is best to restore this redirect or move to the correct title with endash. Gjs238 (talk) 03:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and China. Justiyaya 09:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The recent security agreement draft has been huge news and the two countries have a long history of mutual entanglement, which is very reasonably documented. Atchom (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep they started having relations just recently in 2019 and the issue with the possible Chinese military bases on Australia's borders in the past week is a very significant geopolitical issue. It deserves its own article. If China someday has a base there, I would also say that the base itself should have its own article. Reesorville (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – the topic meets WP:GNG. In addition to the sources in the article, some quick searching on Google Scholar finds in-depth coverage in other sources: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. But please do correct the punctuation, retarget relevant redirects, and move information from the Sino-Pacific relations article to this one as needed. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 20:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.