The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ECommerce company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unsure if this is an article about a class of companies or a group of companies or whatever, but as of now this seems to be a sneaky way to insert links to the website of several companies. I don't know what's best to do with this one. Nominating to generate discussion. I'm leaning towards delete for now, but I'm also open to other suggestions. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 05:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, likely speedy delete: complete bollocks, and so irredeemably confused that no reasonable person could be expected to make sense of it:
  
  Companies offering eCommerce services. eCommerce consists of electronic marketing, where the primary interface for dealing between the business and consumer is a computer. eCommerce services have to do with the sale of a product or a service over the internet. This is continually growing as the industry continues to pick up momentum. A company may consider themselves to be an eCommerce company and provide all, most, or every service desired by a company actively marketing online.
  Typically in eCommerce, there is a certain flow to the transaction. Although there are processes immediately tied to that transaction, there are a wealth of other needs an eCommerce company has. To start off, there is the necessity of an eCommerce platform.....
  
  Jesus wept. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as a vehicle for link spam. -- Whpq (talk) 19:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.