The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Rossiello (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability per WP:GNG not established for founder only covered in reputable media in connection with her company BitPesa, containing little personal information warranting a dedicated article for her Ysangkok (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable businesswoman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep I think the case for notability is that she is a woman in a male dominated industry and thus should probably be kept given that there are sufficient sources already. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtbobwaysf: a woman does not become more notable because you happen to think women are under-represented in whatever industry you think she belongs to. There is no such policy, and what makes you think there is? You cannot just pick and choose arbitrary societal trends and demand that Wikipedia must enforce them. --Ysangkok (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Me voting in an AfD doesnt represent a demand. Her notability in the sources (separte from the startup she founded) stems from her gender, we follow sources not my opinion anyhow. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete She lacks the in-depth reliable coverage in multiple sources to be notable. Everything currently cited in the article seems to be trivial passing mentions. So, as a topic the article fails WP:GNG and the notability guidelines for biographies. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Devokewater@ 11:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.