The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formosis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG since it has seeminly not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Lincolnite (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Searched several hundred google hits, and could not find anything that would help prove the topic passes WP:GNG. I also could not find any notable awards. Yvarta (talk) 21:22, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertising sourced by advertising, enough policy violations in that alone, and then complimented by the fact these accounts were advertising-only (quite heavily). SwisterTwister talk 00:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lots of violations!! Clearly advertising — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asis1990 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 06:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.Not notable WP:CORPDEPTH.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't qualify on WP:ORG. If some sources can be found which aren't promotional in nature, my !vote can change. Lourdes 10:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.