The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No consensus to delete, therefore keep. A redirect can be discussed on the talkpage. Tone 17:27, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Globex Trading System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Most of the refs are from a single Wiki which is not reliable and only one other source. Contentious text sourced to its own web-site has been removed. Previously speedily deleted on 8th September  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   19:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I have added a couple of references but it is debatable whether this topic should be more than a redirect to Chicago_Mercantile_Exchange#Electronic_trading which provides a succinct summary of the development of this platform. AllyD (talk) 08:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Obviously notable. While CME essentially has become Globex, this took a long time - and for two+ decades Globex ran concurrent to the pits with different contract sizes. In any event - this is the system on which most of the future contracts, worldwide by volume, are traded. Even a cursory google books search for "Globex", shows notability. Icewhiz (talk) 17:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Globex was set up in 1992 by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and provides an electronic trading platform for futures and option contracts. I think there is no doubt that it meets our notability criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Chicago Mercantile Exchange#Electronic trading, lots of passing mention, where is the substantive coverage. Important yes, but that doesn't make for notability. Stick with section in the CME article. --Bejnar (talk) 03:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, two refs in the article from The Economist, stopped looking after seeing them. Szzuk (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That counts as 1 reference. Do you have others? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandals1 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect Globex is certainly well-known, the problem is that there isn't much significant coverage of it. It seems like it should be notable, but I see lots of passing mentions and mentions in articles about the CME. I would have thought this would be a keep, but I don't see the necessary coverage.Sandals1 (talk) 15:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - There is no other Wikipedia article that describes this system so I believe that it warrants having it's own article. There are not many good sources out there to reference so it may be a bit lite on detail. I ask everyone here to instead of marking for deletion, add to it to make the article more robust and acceptable. C62eu19 (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.