The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Green Car Congress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of those cases of confusing the criteria for Identifying reliable sources with Notability. We don't create an article on every source that qualifies as reliable. The citations here consist of examples of Green Car Congress being cited in major media, or what WP:WEBCRIT calls "trivial coverage". There is no substantial coverage of the website itself, regardless of how strong a case to be made that it may be cited as a reliable source. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.