< 20 July 22 July >
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn per WP:HEY. Primefac (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claymation Comedy of Horrors[edit]

Claymation Comedy of Horrors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film. One GNews hit, barely anything on the regular search other than blogs, people selling things, and blogs selling things. Primefac (talk) 23:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a genuine question, but does the animator winning an Emmy make the film notable? It sounds more like something that would bolster the animator's notability. Primefac (talk) 03:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm actually not sure, but I think I remember reading a page about the notability guidelines regarding film articles or another deletion discussion that the film winning a significant award indicates notability, much like how a song charting in several nations indicates significant notability. I could be wrong about that, though, since the guidelines can change.editorEهեইдအ😎
Finland:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
France:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
France:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, nac SwisterTwister talk 16:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yosuke Amemiya[edit]

Yosuke Amemiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no indication that this artist meets WP:ARTIST. Derek Andrews (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep with subsequent consensus, nac SwisterTwister talk 00:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wellyson Luiz de Oliveira Sobrau[edit]

Wellyson Luiz de Oliveira Sobrau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. The tag was removed with the claim that the player played in the Romanian top-flight, which doesn't appear to be borne out by the sources. His stint for the Romanian club was when it was playing at the level below that required by WP:NFOOTY. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to GFriend. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sowon (singer)[edit]

Sowon (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC; sources like youtube and fan blogs are not reliable Snowflake91 (talk) 22:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Merge on further reflection and in light for further arguments. Matt's talk 07:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In response to Patapsco913: Being notable for appearing in an MV is extremely questionable and highly unlikely, and variety shows have no place in this argument (see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Korea/Popular_culture#Eradication_of_variety_show_sections). Sowon has not released any solo music, been a cast member on any shows out with the group, or acted in any dramas/films to be notable enough for an individual article just yet. Abdotorg (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So how much weight do we place on the fact that there are six other wiki projects that deem her notable. I think the best route would be to get a Korean language person to put an article for deletion on the Korean page and then see how that plays out.Patapsco913 (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Other Wikipedias have different notabilty criterias; on Korean wiki, EVERY Kpop idol group member has its own page, even the members like Sowon, where you can write literally just one sentence about her, and has no solo career of any kind. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:11, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've said so on the WP:N talk page and will reiterate it here: what weight do we place on there being an article on six other Wikipedias? Zero. As Snowflake91 says, other Wikipedias have different notability criteria, even if Wikipedia was itself a reliable source, which it is not ... and presuming those other articles have likewise come under notability scrutiny, which an examination of the respective talk pages shows they have not. I think the best route would be that if you want to save the article, provide reliable sources discussing the subject in the significant detail the GNG requires. Ravenswing 11:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment for the benefit of the closer: This has since been raised WP:N and there seems to be a near unanimous agreement that existence on other language wiki's does not carry any weight in itsself. This make the above an invalid keep argument.Tvx1 14:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sources are not in-depth as required for notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]
I think they are typical of acceptable young pop group singer bios. It's a judgement call, if sufficient depth is disagreed with, merge and redirect to GFriend. Do not "delete". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:46, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Soompi is not "reliable independent source", it is probably the worst possible source for Korean entertainment news per WP:KO/RS, it is a sensationalism blog-like website, written by people without any competences, mostly fans. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Soompi I numbered (2), I'll look harder at it later. What about my (1) and (3)? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:26, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
With the help of google translate (not super helpful and a bit funny, "When I meet my buttocks, my sleep comes up." would be a good title for almost anything) they both appear to include of a description of wish/wishes that she wrote herself. Not ideal for WP:GNG. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Sowon" literally means "wish" in Korean, so its probably that. Anyway, I already merged and expanded "Members" section at Gfirend page, so it can get deleted/redirected. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, SmokeyJoe, let's turn that around some. We're not required to demonstrate that those aren't reliable sources. You're required to demonstrate why they are. You stated, emphatically, that those represented "secondary source coverage in reliable independent sources." That presumes that you did the work necessary to verify they are. Would you present your evidence, please? Ravenswing 14:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It only takes a reading of the text to tell that they are secondary sources, you look for qualitative commentary on pre-known facts. Reliable, I look again at the text, is there any reason to doubt the facts, are there extraordinary claims, and I also look at other articles from the same website. The hardest test is "independence". The group is a commercial entity, they have management, advertising budgets, etc, and we live in a world of subtle advertising. What I looked for is whether the article, and then the website, also contains, directly or indirectly, links to purchases. If they do, I would call it unashamed promotion (write a story, thin finished with a link to buy tickets). I didn't find these things. I think I spent ten minutes doing these things. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not a lot of substance to the delete arguments here, and this group nomination is problematic. Please make an individual nomination if you want the community to reconsider. A Traintalk 17:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kenya International[edit]

Kenya International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability established. Only link is a results database. Also the medalists are mostly red links (which again questions the notability of the event in itself). Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC) Also nominating the following for the same reasons:[reply]

Algeria International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Argentina International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - this one is unreferenced as well
Greece International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Guatemala International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Singapore International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Slovenian International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - this one is unreferenced as well
Smiling Fish International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - this one is unreferenced as well
Kharkiv International (badminton) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - this one is unreferenced as well
Ethiopia International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Czech International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Cyprus International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But the article needs more to it than just statistics to make it a full-fledged Wikipedia entry. There needs to be a block of text describing the history of Kenya International in addition to the statistics.TH1980 (talk) 00:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all The reason same with Maldives International, Uganda International, White Nights which was nominated before but the results is keep. It would be great if you improved insted of deleted. Stvbastian (talk) 08:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agree to separate. Some articles also coverage in the news. Like LibrePrincess comment in Talk:Kenya International: duckduckgo.com/?q="Kenya+International"+badminton seems to bring up a few news sources that report on the events. standardmedia.co.ke, ugandaradionetwork.com, allafrica.com 1, allafrica.com 2, sportsnewsarena.com. I also added some references on Argentina International and Greece International, and i tried to improve all that articles. Stvbastian (talk) 14:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. These are except for Singapore and Thailand the highest level international tournaments held in the respective countries and are sanctioned by the Badminton World Federation and Badminton Continental Confederations (and Singapore and Thailand are one of the most important countries in badminton and a second level tournament should be relevant like in the countries of similar importance in tennis for instance). All of the tournaments are similar to comparable events in tennis, or golf for instance. Additionally, there are enough sources here to pass GNG. Looking at some of the winners shows that these tournaments clearly attract some very good players. In comparison (stated in Wikipedia:Notability_(events)), College bowl games (not limited to BCS or College Football Playoff bowl games, see e.g. 2009–10 NCAA football bowl games) or All-star or similar exhibition games are notable. All of the mentioned articles for deletion above are of much bigger relevance than the cited college games. Additionally, similar events were already discussed in detail, with all of them as result Keep. Florentyna (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irina Gritsenko[edit]

Irina Gritsenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability as there is no GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meet #1,3,5 WP:NBADMINTON. Stvbastian (talk) 09:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets #1,3,5 WP:NBADMINTON. Florentyna (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not only meets WP:NBADMINTON, but does so multiple-times over (e.g., four word championships appearances). Not like the subject just passed the guideline, but well surpasses. Might be different if they appeared in one world championship and lost soundly. Has competed multiple times, won some matches, and is only World Championship results, not even including criteria 3 or 5. RonSigPi (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ThomasTekno[edit]

ThomasTekno (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 21:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (Not a snowball's chance of another outcome.) czar 21:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Thorn[edit]

Roger Thorn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hoax article. This person doesn't exist. Checked sources and there is no search person named Roger Thorn who worked as VP of game publishing on Xbox or at Mircrosoft. The1337gamer (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 20:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 20:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Euratlas History Maps[edit]

Euratlas History Maps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB and fails WP:RS Zazzysa (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many sources online citing Euratlas. As Notability for Webs says(quote) "the individual web content has received [...] attention from independent sources" and also "Notability requires only that these necessary sources exist, not that the sources have already been named in the article". Maybe more sources should be added, specially in German and French. But the sources already exist, indeed, so it is a notable subject. Many blogs and reviews exist, including university (public!) endorsement. All independently and in many, many languages.

Are the Universities of Virginia, Duke and Stamford not reliable sources? Is the AU Library Knowledgebase not a reliable source? Please, explain yourself on that. Check (quite huge) traffic analytics https://www.similarweb.com/website/euratlas.net Comte arnau(talk) 23:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are also some academic works that discuss Euratlas a bit as part of the work, which could be used as sources for the article: [1], [2], [3]. Here's also a post about it on the University of Chicago Visual Resources Center site. Dreamyshade (talk) 02:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. Excessive nomination. (non-admin closure) Greenbörg (talk) 09:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the talk page for more about the duplication nominations. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:47, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zarb-e-Sukhan[edit]

Zarb-e-Sukhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article share the same problems in referencing with The Wise Way therefore i suggest it to be deleted. Saqib (talk) 18:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, it seems to pass GNG. If others think otherwise, it should definitely be merged with the author's article. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those have both been open for more than 7 days now, any idea why they haven't been closed yet? Landscape repton (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
1) It doesn't have an ISBN number.
2) worldcat searches in both English and Urdu return zero results for it in library holdings (compared to the threshold criteria of a dozen or more holdings)
3) It doesn't appear in the 'relevant' National Collection, whether that's taken to be Britain, The Netherlands, or Pakistan. None of them contain this book in their catalogues.
Normally, failure of any one of these would be taken as exclusionary. There were a small number of reviews, but nothing to suggest notability, and certainly not enough to suggest this book warrants a standalone article distinct from the author page.
I'd also note that there's a strong argument that this breaches WP:G11. The article was created by a personal friend of the author who 'shares his computer sometimes', and was first added to minutes after creation by the author himself. I've tried removing some of the more explicit promotional language, but it's still inherently promotional.
I've not much against merging to the author page except that there's basically nothing here that isn't a duplication of what's there anyway. Landscape repton (talk) 19:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If CJCurrie (or anyone else) would like the article userfied so work is not lost, please let me know. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marguerite Ceschi-Smith[edit]

Marguerite Ceschi-Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ceschi-Smith was a city councillor in Brantford, Ontario, a city not large enough to confer notability on its councillors (as per WP:NPOL, WP:POLOUTCOMES, and MOS:CA#Municipal politics).

I found no coverage of Ceschi-Smith in any news sources other than WP:ROUTINE coverage in local papers. Madg2011 (talk) 18:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daphne Barak[edit]

Daphne Barak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article does not have any notablity and the page have very little verified information. That's why I think the article should be deleted Ominictionary (talk) 18:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:54, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:54, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Speedy delete. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR 17:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arts 4 Peace Awards[edit]

Arts 4 Peace Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find no evidence that this event meets WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT. Largoplazo (talk) 18:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR 18:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harrison osterfield[edit]

Harrison osterfield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kingonelol, read the message above, which gives the reasons it is nominated for deletion. This is the page to comment on. Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kingonelol, please stop wiping the discussion - just contribute to it. Boleyn (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Stuffer[edit]

Hans Stuffer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On behalf of Linkinpit (talk · contribs) - see Talk: and User talk:Home Lander (where they claim to be the subject of this BLP). As it's a protected article and they're a new editor, they can't do it for themself.

WP:BIODELETE Relatively unknown non-public figure. Wikipedia page should be deleted. Andy Dingley (talk) (for Linkinpit) 18:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If we did have an article on the game, and the game impact is substantial, we could have some coverage as a section within that. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. My mistake. Misreading of WP:NGRIDIRON. Basalisk inspect damageberate 17:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delvin Lamar Hughley[edit]

Delvin Lamar Hughley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never played a professional game of American Football, played only in the Arena Football League under different rules and so doesn't meet WP:NGRIDIRON. I can't find any good coverage in reliable sources. Not notable. Basalisk inspect damageberate 17:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Jane Peterson[edit]

Jessica Jane Peterson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and renominate. OK, it seems like this turned into a "trainwreck" - too many disparate topics under the same header. The NRHP sites have consensus to keep, the other should be renominated as individual AfDs Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pink House (Melbourne Beach, Florida)[edit]

I am also nominating the following related pages because [they all seem to be created to circumvent the WP rules on non-promotion by B&B owners, possibly as a result of the YouTube instruction video I referenced for Pink House AfD recommendation]:

Moses J. Taylor House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bishop-Andrews Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Fairbanks House (Fernandina Beach, Florida) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
A. P. Dickman House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Grant Van Valkenburg House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Old Town Manor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Mary Phifer McKenzie House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
John Lee McFarlin House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Hoyt House (Fernandina Beach, Florida) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)



Pink House (Melbourne Beach, Florida) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Business advertisement RobP (talk) 17:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled across a YouTube video training B & B owners how to try to circumvent the WP rules on non-promotion - and it is brazenly named: Getting Your Business on Wikipedia! I did a quick search on B & B and came across this article which seems to fit the bill of an article on a business with no particular WP:Notability that may be connected. I wonder how many others there are? [6] RobP (talk) 17:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This was not a bundled nomination when I had !voted. It was changed after. Striking thru. Any nominated properties on NRHP or with a state heritage designation should not be deleted, of course. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm striking my !vote, which was made before the AfD included multiple articles. I still don't find anything about Pink House, but certainly a number of these are perfectly suitable buildings for an article. Smmurphy(Talk) 08:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before responding to the unsigned question from DanTD, I'll provide the links that I should have provided in my first comment. These are the links to the NRHP listings for the Key West Historical District: the 1971 application and the 1983 application (the 1983 listing appears to be for an expansion of the 1971 district). I searched both listings (and for both listings, both the applications and the photographs) for mentions of "Old Town Manor" or "Eaton Lodge". Neither showed up. As to DanTD's question, I don't know whether the Old Town Manor is on any non-Federal list. But consider this -- the NRHP has a bit less than 100,000 listings but, if the list were expanded to include all of the "contributing" properties within the historic districts, that list would run to about a million. And if we add non-NRHP sites that are deemed "historic" at the state or local level, how many would we have? Two million? Five million? Ten million? I don't know, but even one million is far too large a number for us to have a separate stand-alone article for each property. And so, without evidence of notability that goes well beyond a mere listing at the state or local level, we probably shouldn't be considering non-NRHP buildings. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My not signing my message was an accident, and I apologize. In response to your concerns for one agree that we shouldn't write about every site that's an NRHP contributing property or every single local historic site. But keep these facts in mind; the NRHP template does have provisions for both and more (Template:Infobox NRHP), and other historic sites that are not individual NRHP sites are allowed here. I strongly recommend some New York City Landmarks, which includes both NRHP and non-NRHP sites. I also recommend articles such as The Old 76 House, Saint James General Store, St. James (LIRR station), Southampton (LIRR station), Shinnecock Hills (LIRR station), Mamaroneck (Metro-North station), and plenty of others that fit into these categories. If the old houses that were converted into Bed & Breakfasts that aren't on NRHP don't fit any criteria, I can gladly accept merging them somewhere. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 01:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, here's Florida's page related to historic sites. I'm still trying to navigate that thing so I can figure out whether the non-NRHP sites are registered with either the state, or cities like Melbourne Beach, Fernandina Beach, Key West, etcetera. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 01:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as unchanged consensus aside from nominator, nac, SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deep_state_in_the_United_States[edit]

Deep_state_in_the_United_States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is Point of View DrElgin (talk) 16:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC) Article is Point of View. Article is not Encyclopedic. Deep state is not an American phase in common usage, it is a "slang phrase" only used by a small group of far right.DrElgin (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think it is a bad idea to think of it solely as "a Trump specific conspiracy theory" because the concept is older and broader than that. A few minutes on Google turns up examples where the concept has been written about by academics on the progressive side (see Peter Dale Scott) and by the ex-Republican Mike Lofgren. Deli nk (talk) 11:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph David-Jones[edit]

Joseph David-Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet criteria for an article Kellymoat (talk) 14:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect as suggested, nac, SwisterTwister talk 00:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roderick Strohl[edit]

Roderick Strohl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Roderick Strohl was an NCO in E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States) during World War II. Neither his rank nor awards qualify him for a page under WP:SOLDIER. Post-war, Strohl led a quiet life that did qualify him for consideration under WP:GNG. Strohl was not portrayed in the HBO miniseries, although his action of going AWOL to rejoin his company was attributed to another character; he did appear in the introductory commentaries and in the accompanying documentary. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep this article, and if only because "Kesselring would not surrender to a Sergeant." --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That hardly makes Strohl notable.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 01:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To simplify history, you should also delete the List of the 72 names on the Eiffel Tower and cover the plaques with graphities, because we all learned in school that it was Gustave, who built this tower.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 02:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Although sources were found and presented in the debate, the general agreement is they were insufficient to prove notability. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quintessential Capital Management[edit]

Quintessential Capital Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article created by an SPA about a subject that is borderline. They were involved with reporting irregularities at another company that did cause that firm to file for bankruptcy, but most of the coverage that exists about them is one line in larger reports about the other firm being caught. The Independent's coverage is one line and refers to them as "little known", which I think helps shore up the argument that they are not a significant player. WP:CORPDEPTH combined with the promotional factors make this article fail WP:N. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As far as "little-known" the fund was probably little known prior to the Globo events. After the Globo event, with the fund mentioned in several top newspapers and the portfolio manager invited to speak in several high-profile events, the fund is now quite well known, at least in Italy, in the UK and within the hedge fund community.Yakag (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • La Repubblica, Italy's second largest newspaper, has covered Quintessential in a full article which, though in Italian, describes the fund and its activities just as much as the Globo event itself: The 007 Fund and even calls it with the nickname "the 007 fund".
Again, in this old WSJ article, Gregory Zuckerman from the WSJ actually seeks out Mr. Grego, as a representative of Quintessential, to ask opinions about market conditions. They would not do that if the fund were not a significant player.
https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=16353&mn=26761&pt=msg&mid=15260267Yakag (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globo_plc has a link to the page Quintessential Capital Management confirming it is main player in discovering the fraud. talk
In addition, I ran a Google search on the company excluding the word "globo": "quintessential capital management" -globo. Nothing useful for establishing notability was returned, only 21 hits in all. So, at least for purposes of WP:GNG, one could make a case for sufficient coverage in sources dealing with the Globo case—but, then, I believe WP:ONEEVENT applies. Largoplazo (talk) 16:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just clicked all the links you listed and, except for the first one (regular Google search), which I already discussed above, there are zero hits, which doesn't qualify as easily found. Largoplazo (talk) 18:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
*Likewise--SamHolt6 (talk) 18:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yakag (talk) 09:47, 28 July 2017 (UTC) connected contributor[reply]
  • The last two are the same article. What they have to say about QCM is contained in a single sentence: "Quintessential Capital Management, another firm short on AAC, has written similar reports on the company’s drug testing practices and other issues within the company." This isn't significant coverage. Neither is mentioning that someone being quoted in an article runs a company, as in the WSJ article, significant coverage of the company. Largoplazo (talk) 10:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I removed one of the links, it was a re-print. Still, all the material taken together gives a measure of notoriety and of course WSJ is a highly reputable source. Best. Yakag (talk) 13:45, 28 July 2017 (UTC) connected contributor[reply]
  • The WSJ's reputation suits it for establishing verifiability but it's immaterial to a notability evaluation of a subject if it does no more than mention the subject's name in passing. But now I'm quibbling over individual sources with you. See what I wrote above about how, overall, one might indeed be able to make a case that there's sufficient coverage of Quintessential—but only in connection with that one case, so I wondered whether WP:ONEEVENT might come into play. No one has responded to that. Largoplazo (talk) 14:16, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Alex ShihTalk 04:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth K. Hansraj[edit]

Kenneth K. Hansraj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO/WP:NPROF. Most Ghits are him being cited as an "expert" in articles but I couldn't find any coverage of him personally. Possible undisclosed COI by author, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#International_Project_Management_Association. shoy (reactions) 14:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Even if we accept that Darkodazines doesn't have a COI, he hasn't made a policy-based argument to keep. A Traintalk 16:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PrimaveraReader (software)[edit]

PrimaveraReader (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software that was previously deleted via AfD. The reason I am not nominating this as G4 is that it does have additional reviews from this year: I don't think that solves the underlying problem, they are from blogs or other non-reliable sources so it still doesn't meet the coverage prong of WP:N. The article is also promotional in tone and has been created by a declared paid editor, so exclusion under WP:NOTSPAM also makes it fail the second prong of the notability guideline. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article fails WP:V and WP:NOR, and the provided sources are all blog posts and press releases - nothing that reliable enough to establish the notability of the subject. menaechmi (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as given, nac, SwisterTwister talk 00:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RCD Espanyol cantera[edit]

RCD Espanyol cantera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subsidiary of a football club in Spain, lack of coverage. No inherited notability. Redirect to parent article RCD Espanyol. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP (sports notability criteria doesn't apply to sports teams) - TheMagnificentist 14:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. - TheMagnificentist 14:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. - TheMagnificentist 14:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. - TheMagnificentist 14:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as creator. Several such articles exist for the top Spanish club youth sections. Espanyol have produced many elite players so their setup is significant in that respect, and they have also won the national competitions several times in recent years. That is all in the article, sourced in some cases and linked in others. Current Squad list and other dynamic info requires to be updated for new season, but previous one only ended a few weeks ago and I was planning to update this in the next few weeks when I had sufficient time to get it all correct, (which takes longer when working primarily from another language) rather than trying to rush it. There is plenty of independent media coverage available, so to add CN tags or a RefImprove hatnote would perhaps be fair in the first instance. But to simply blank-redirect to the main club article with out warning, giving me and others no chance to rectify any of the issues identified (either via the article or personal talk pages) is an unnecessary overreaction in my opinion. Previous discussions regarding these articles have taken place at WP:FOOTY fairly recently here, here and here, which acknowledge that they can be notable when the academy is very productive and/or successful in its own sphere, rather than just being a youth team attached to a famous name club. I believe the Espanyol article fulfils these requirements, although as stated above it maybe needs more independent citations to reinforce this notability.Crowsus (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:35, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 15:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:04, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff King (consultant)[edit]

Jeff King (consultant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC by a wide margin. With the exception of this article on the Local page of the Sioux City Iowa Journal, nothing but passing mentions and a few quotations found (even after asking author). WP:BLP1E (and not a very notable E) and WP:NOTINHERITED also apply. Toddst1 (talk) 13:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lard Almighty what about this statement "Except this article on the Local page of the Sioux City Iowa Journal, nothing but passing mentions and a few quotations found (even after asking author). " refering to http://siouxcityjournal.com/news/local/a1/jeff-king-plays-big-role-in-his-father-s-campaigns/article_0337fbe5-fd7c-52af-b9e9-c9b11bd38c42.html
It is of substance and by an Iowa institution Sioux City Journal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipietime (talkcontribs) 15:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of people who aren't notable play big roles in lots of things. Simply haven't come up with the kind of coverage (certainly not "many sources of citation") I would need to see to change my mind. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Given the subject's search-engine-defying name, no prejudice against re-creation of the article with proper sourcing. A Traintalk 16:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marsh (artist)[edit]

Marsh (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:NMG and fails WP:RS. Zazzysa (talk) 12:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hexahydroxy-2,3-naphthalenedione[edit]

Hexahydroxy-2,3-naphthalenedione (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious existence, and lack of notability. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 12:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merely having a CAS number is insufficient reason to keep an article. Chemistry articles are not exempt from WP:GNG (see WP:NCHEM). ChemNerd (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Xwt[edit]

Xwt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Ajgorhoe who provided a rationale on Talk:Xwt, but sadly I read it as WP:ITSIMPORTANT, and without sources to back this up I am afraid it's time for a wider discussion here. PS. Ajgorhoe also suggested this could be merged to MonoDevelop, which I am not opposed to, but the fact that MonoDevelop doesn't even mention Xwt is IMHO a further underlining of this software lack of importance. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 08:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 08:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 06:33, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 08:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also to comment on the suggested merge
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PayTech of Things[edit]

PayTech of Things (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

apparent neologism. I can not find any actual use of the full term. There are uses for PayTech in the sense meant here, such as ref 2. But it is also the name of a payroll processing firm and a financial transactions intermediate, neither notable and I think altogether unconnected. DGG ( talk ) 05:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been updated to include reference to the term used by Tony Craddock, the Director General of the Emerging Payments Association (EPA). It refers to use of the term within the EPA, which is the leading trade body representing senior business leaders and thought leaders across the electronic payments industry.JbanksBTM (talk) 08:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately what you have added appears promotional for your organization. Do you have evidence of its use in general publications or even trade publications to describe the class of objects? DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to clarify that I am not employed by the Emerging Payments Association (EPA) or a member of their organisation. The EPA is a professional membership body and so does not produce or sell any products related to the Paytech of Things. Mr Craddock is speaking in his professional capacity as the Director General of the EPA and is summarising the content of conversations he has conducted among members. As requested, I have found an additional reference to the term in an article published in RealWire, the respected payments news website. I apologise if I did not provide adequate information initially. JbanksBTM (talk) 13:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JbanksBTM, Realwire is a press release website, not a news website, and comes nowhere near the standards required by Wikipedia's view of reliable sources. Also, could you explain your relationship to User:PayTechGuy since you seem to have copied his sandbox to mainspace for this article, robbing him of the attribution required? Cabayi (talk) 14:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the confusion over the User name. I am PayTechGuy and have clearly managed to press a wrong button when publishing the page. I am happy to correct this if necessary if you could direct me to some instructions for how to do so. Many thanks. JbanksBTM (talk) 13:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JbanksBTM, There's no problem in starting afresh with a new account. But stick to the new account, don't use both. WP:SOCK explains the rules. Happy editing, Cabayi (talk) 14:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The financial services news service called Bob's Guide also referenced the PayTech of Things. JbanksBTM (talk) 14:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 12:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST -- RoySmith (talk) 13:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Habib Khan Ghori[edit]

Habib Khan Ghori (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST. No source per WP:RS. No notable award. I failed to find sources in Urdu language too to avoid system bias. Greenbörg (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete Moona Sehgal (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sahabah. SoWhy 20:11, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hayatus Sahabah[edit]

Hayatus Sahabah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced; fails WP:NBOOK. DrStrauss talk 08:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also to discuss the proposed redirect
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:PROMOTIONAL and WP:GNG -- RoySmith (talk) 12:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Bewick[edit]

Dan Bewick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unashamed promotional article by someone whose only activity other than being the creator and major contributor to this article revolves around excessive promotion of another band. Riddled with issues. GNG and WP:Music being the primary ones for this nomination. Also effectively unreferenced - discogs and imdb profiles only. Excessive discography list with no references and no indication of his role in them. Click through all the aliases, variations and incarnations on the discogs profile page and there's no suggestion that we're getting anywhere near notability.

Main discogs page Discogs for Dirty Rotten Scoundrels - the article implies that DRS are a notable group such that membership of conveys notability. this link suggests otherwise. another profile of an alias (these are not cherry-picked to support the nom)
and another. subject has numerous aliases but all very low level releases, maybe a remix on a very non-notable track, one appearance on a random compilation album. seems to be a trend across the few aliases used by subject. overall it seems like the sum total falls short of notability - general or music.
Rather than tidying it and then nominating it, i'm leaving it in its original form. Commenters can then see the list of awards (unreferenced) which are seemingly insignificant awards with regards to notability (no article and nothing on google). Rayman60 (talk) 08:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael F. Carroll[edit]

Michael F. Carroll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a municipal councillor, in a village not large enough to confer an automatic presumption of notability on its municipal councillors under WP:NPOL. This is not based on enough reliable sources to pass the "who have received significant press coverage" part of our criteria for local officeholders, either -- of the seven sources here, two are primary sources (his own self-published profiles on the websites of his own political party and his own law firm), one is a user-generated local community wiki and one is a local WordPress blog, and the three remaining media sources are purely WP:ROUTINE since every municipal councillor everywhere could always show three pieces of purely local coverage. At this level of government, what it takes to get an article is evidence that he's significantly more notable than the norm by virtue of having garnered significantly more coverage than village councillors routinely get, but nothing here is demonstrating any evidence of that. Bearcat (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 11:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep with given comments, SwisterTwister talk 00:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RAF Krendi[edit]

RAF Krendi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refs seem to all come from RAF web pages; discussion in multiple independent secondary sources is lacking. KDS4444 (talk) 11:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Icewhiz: How? MILUNIT specifies that "Air force, naval, or marine aviation squadrons, wings, groups, and commands" could be notable and that might apply to the three fighter squadrons that were stationed on Krendi, but not the runway and buildings. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The base commander is, in many air forces, the commander with authority over the stationed squadrons. Thus, this is greater than a squadron. Futhermore I will note that most military bases are deemed notable. This is rarely a question. It might be a question for a small barracks or a group of tents but not an airfield which is not a small installation.Icewhiz (talk) 18:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Traintalk 16:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Knappily[edit]

Knappily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company/app. Lack of significant coverage. - TheMagnificentist 11:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone would like the article moved to their userspace, let me know. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lilo (search engine)[edit]

Lilo (search engine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable search engine. Unable to locate any significant coverage that are reliable and independent of the topic. - TheMagnificentist 10:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Larrikin Love. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Leeson[edit]

Edward Leeson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BAND Mdann52 (talk) 10:34, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:BAND Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 11:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 16:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saru Maini[edit]

Saru Maini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable singer. Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 07:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 08:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus for deletion exists in this discussion. North America1000 13:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Axel Bergstedt[edit]

Axel Bergstedt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. Appears to be mostly covered for one crime, and is borderline notable for his career. Mdann52 (talk) 10:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Restoration of any entry can be requested on WP:REFUND Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gia na xereis alaniari[edit]

Gia na xereis alaniari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across these articles when going through the New Pages Feed. They are all created by the same user, Samizambak, and are all stubs, mostly under 100 words. All are about "anonymous Turkish folk tunes", the vast majority are either completely unreferenced or rely on a single source. They appear to fail music notability guidelines and the general notability guideline and the lack of sources makes detracts from their verifiability. I used the reviewer talk page as a sounding board and MrX recommended deletion. Please also note the consensus gained on similar recent mass creations such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open access in Vietnam. The article List of anonymous Turkish folk songs already exists but appears to have not been edited by the user who created these stubs. Therefore, I recommend the deletion of these articles, with no prejudice to recreation of some if sources can be found and the content can be expanded, and to extend an invitation to Samizambak to expand List of anonymous Turkish folk songs.

TL;DR: delete all per WP:V, WP:NMUSIC, WP:GNG with no prejudice to recreation and invite Samizambak to expand the already-existing list.

Note to admin: if the result is delete, please note that there are numerous redirects to these pages which will need deletion too.

DrStrauss talk 10:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kaşık Havası Album (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Girl from Chanakkale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Girl from Uşak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Silivri Sirtosu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ela na filithoume (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Raikos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Daha Senden Gayrı Aşık Mı Yoktur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Erzurum Shoror (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
İzmir'in Kavakları (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Koyuna Bak Koyuna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ainde oples (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Karabiberim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sille (dance) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ayva çiçek açmış (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Apo Ta Glyka Sou Matia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Çemberim dalda kaldı (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kaşık Havası (melody) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Giaroumpi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ben Kalender Meşrebim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Giorgitsa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Attaris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Derik Saçın Örmezler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Choros Koutalion (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Horozumu Kaçırdılar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Derik Saçın Örmezler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Şafak Söktü (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bülbül olsam kona da bilsem dallere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Nalbandim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sivastan Aldım Bakır (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lorke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yalelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gel Gel Aman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Derdim Çoktur Hangisine Yanayım (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Karanfil Ocak Ocak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Damdan Attım Kendimi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yaniyorum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Akşam Aşıp Gidiyor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bir tas attim kamisa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sabahin Seher Vaktinde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Setiremin düğmeleri aman bir sıra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sareri Hovin Mernem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Oğlan Oğlan Kalk Gidelim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Karpuz Kestim Yiyen Yok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pınar başı burma burma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Oklavıyam Pazıyam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sut ictim dilim yandi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Apopse ta mesanychta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Olmaz (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Alaylar Alaylar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bahçelerde Bol Erik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bahçelerde Mor Meni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Afta Ta Mavra Dentra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Evlerinin önü nane de maydanoz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kalenin dibinde bir taş olaydım (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bahçenize Gireyim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bahar geldi gül açtı (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Evlerinin önü mersin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Fetos to kalokairaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Limon ektim taşa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Eche Geia Panagia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ayşem Ayşem Mor Menekşem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Düriyemin güğümleri kalaylı (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Girdim yarin bahçesine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yağmur yağar taş üstüne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Çökertme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Aldı Beni İki Kaşın Arası (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kalenin burcuna taş ben olaydım (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kız pınar başında testi doldurur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Turkmen kizi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kürdün kızı (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kız Demedim Dul Demedim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lambaya püf de (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ağlama Yar Ağlama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Hangi bağın bağbanısan gülüsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Karahisar kalesi (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Makaram Sarı Bağlar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Harada kaldın (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ağıt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kale kaleye karşı (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Oklavıyam Pazıyam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ağlama ceylan balası (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
İki keklik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yeşil Ördek Gibi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Şişeler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Hey Onbeşli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yekte Anam Yekte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tahinli pide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
İpek Olsam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Uçun kuşlar uçun İzmir'e doğru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ham meyvayı kopardılar dalından (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ahçik Çıkmış Kilisenin Taşına (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Black Sea was storming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ağrı Dağından Uçtum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tis Triandafilias Ta Fila (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Aman gel aman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
İstanbul'dan Üsküdara yol gider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ponemeni kardia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Oso varoun ta sidera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Aman Doktor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ada sahillerinde bekliyorum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Girl from Samos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bahcamiza geldi bahar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Cemalim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Apochairetismos (Thalassa) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yaylığım (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Esmer Ahçik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Alan cayirlanda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Alatsatiani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Girl from Reisdere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gemilerde talim var (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gia na xereis alaniari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Nick Moyes: possibly, but process is important in these instances. In any event, if Samizambak is "away" right now, I'm sure an administrator will be willing to provide them with copies of their deleted articles so they can improve them. DrStrauss talk 12:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Green Car Congress[edit]

Green Car Congress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of those cases of confusing the criteria for Identifying reliable sources with Notability. We don't create an article on every source that qualifies as reliable. The citations here consist of examples of Green Car Congress being cited in major media, or what WP:WEBCRIT calls "trivial coverage". There is no substantial coverage of the website itself, regardless of how strong a case to be made that it may be cited as a reliable source. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Vandervaart[edit]

Charles Vandervaart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a teen actor, not yet demonstrated or properly sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. Whereas NACTOR requires multiple major roles, Vandervaart has had one major role and a bunch of minor supporting ones -- and the sourcing here rests entirely on community weekly pennysavers in his own hometown rather than major market dailies, so there aren't sufficient grounds to claim that he passes WP:GNG yet. One noteworthy role would be enough if he got an award nomination, or if the sourcing showed that he was getting much more widespread media coverage, for it -- but one noteworthy role is not enough to confer an automatic presumption of notability on an actor just because he exists. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he has a stronger notability claim and better sourcing for it, but neither the sourcing nor the substance present here are good enough yet. Bearcat (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Victor[edit]

Samuel Victor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Music artist and actor who has some assertion of notability, but the sources cited aren't useful for establishing notability (primary sources, IMDB, directory listings, etc.). Article was created by a corporate Wikipedia account (the subject's own organization, now blocked), apparently in an attempt at self-promotion. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 09:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. as although nobody voted "keep", there was such little discussion, so WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Entertainment Under The Stars[edit]

Entertainment Under The Stars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. The creator has an obvious COI. SL93 (talk) 04:55, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A Traintalk 16:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Public Service Corporation (disambiguation)[edit]

Public Service Corporation (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete because the 2 entries on this disambiguation page refer to the same thing. Public Service Railway redirects to Transport of New Jersey#Public Service Railway which talks about "Public Service Corporation of New Jersey"; Public Service Enterprise Group in the lede says "founded as the Public Service Corporation of New Jersey". Speedy deletion (WP:G6) was declined by user:Basalisk. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 09:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lorenzo Penna[edit]

Lorenzo Penna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NSPORT, having only played in Italy's second-tier league. Only routine press coverage, nothing that meets the WP:GNG. – Joe (talk) 21:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - actually did play in Lega Basket Serie A in the 2015-16 season. See here. So he does meet WP:NBASKETBALL. Rikster2 (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 16:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cameroon Academy Awards[edit]

Cameroon Academy Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable awards ceremony. I can't find evidence of it happening after the first occurance. Own site is dead, facebook un-updated in years, only refs here are dead with no archive and/or press-release. DMacks (talk) 07:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 09:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 20:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Safdar Zaidi[edit]

Safdar Zaidi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources per WP:RS. No real world notability as search produces nothing. Writing single novel and translating to Dutch language won't make someone notable. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:ANYBIO. No notable awards or done something special. Fails WP:GNG

Source 1: Daily Dharti, not notable as it is a local online website. Its posts are related to the problems faced by Pakistani diaspora and can't be trusted. Source 3,5,8 are related to the same website which is a local unreliable source. Source 4 discuss him but that single source doesn't show he has done something special.

Adding to that I searched local Urdu newspapers and can't find anything. He doesn't have an article on Dutch or Urdu Wikipedia. If anyone has any reliable sources please post and I will have no objection. Greenbörg (talk) 11:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanlife Products[edit]

Cleanlife Products (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable company. Available sources are press releases and routine coverage about venture capital. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - MrX 10:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Soldier[edit]

Ultimate Soldier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Some coverage by fan/collector sites, but nothing significant. Can't see this getting past WP:PRODUCT Niteshift36 (talk) 18:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 08:33, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 16:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reuben Rox[edit]

Reuben Rox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria in WP:ENT. Krychek (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 08:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A Traintalk 16:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graham & James[edit]

Graham & James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. There are mentions of this law firm in reliable sources, but not the significant coverage that would get it past notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 09:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dilwale (2015 film). (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 09:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janam Janam[edit]

Janam Janam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not have WP:SIGCOV by reliable and independent sources. Other reliable sources mention the song passingly while discussing about the film it is from, or the actors/singers. Fails WP:GNG. Passes WP:MILL though. This song can be discussed appropriately in the article of the film it is from. —usernamekiran(talk) 03:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Administrators please take a note of this user @Usernamekiran:, this user is stalking me as well as my contributions, most of my articles to are well sourced and have many coverages, but still this guy is placing deletion tags. The users article creation log shows he have created less than 5 articles ,the user is not involved in content creation ,but tries to delete others creation. Anoptimistix (talk) 03:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anoptimistix: I think your previous comment better fits in WP:ANI. usernamekiran(talk) 03:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Done. Added independent coverage of the song by reputed and reliable Indian news Media Indian Express.Now I think it qualifies notability criteria of the song as it has an independent coverage Anoptimistix (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:48, 7 July 2017(UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per no participation herein other than from the nominator. North America1000 14:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Bayazid[edit]

Muhammad Bayazid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines under WP:FILMMAKER. References do not establish the subject as a notable filmmaker. There are claims to notability via an award for an unnamed film given at an unnamed film festival, with no third-party substantiation. One of the references is a tumblr page; the other does establish that he ran afoul of the Assad government, but not that he is notable as a filmmaker. PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:48, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 16:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wajeha Khan Durani[edit]

Wajeha Khan Durani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

may have minor rules in the TV programmes. doesn't seems to meet WP:ACTORS. Saqib (talk) 05:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:27, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 08:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Carter Spann[edit]

Gloria Carter Spann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Relatives of presidents are not inherently notable; she was not a first lady and had no official role during her brother's presidency. She needs to pass WP:BIO on her own, and she fails at that. Kbabej (talk) 23:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 23:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note, I've now added this material to the article and provided references; she appears to me to meet GNG, NPOV, NOR, and V. Smmurphy(Talk) 22:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss the newly mentioned sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 08:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Ratio[edit]

Happy Ratio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable product, as it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. The sources in the article talk more about other products rather than Happy Ratio itself. A7 was declined by Ritchie333 Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:40, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:40, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Counter-Argument

I am not sure where I provide the argument to not delete the article, so I will just do it here. Happy Ratio is made by the SAME people that made The Perfect Meal, and SupermealX. The SupermealX and it's creator (Harsh Batra) were featured in very crdible media such as the New York Times, Economic Times, etc. Happy Ratio is the evolution and in a sense a rebranding of the SupermealX, so every article about th e SupermealX does apply to Happy Ratio as well, including of course NYTimes. To sum it up, Happy Ratio WAS SupermealX till a couple of months ago, and this new iteration just rebrands and markets ot more properly, but everything else is about the same as SupermealX (which recieved a lot of coverage and was clearly a notable product, hence the same applied to Happy Ratio). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshinvader (talkcontribs) 03:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sinebot signature, messing up table of contents on the log page, "WE WAZ IN NOO YURK TIMEZ!!1"... obvious COI SPA is obvious. KMF (talk) 04:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE

I added a history section to the article. Hope it makes clear that this is a notable product as it has received coverage from trusted news organisations.

Can I now go ahead and remove the deletion warning?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshinvader (talkcontribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SpacemanSpiff 03:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 08:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 20:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aria Soleimani[edit]

Aria Soleimani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Lacks GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:27, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 08:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus which defaults to keep. NightwingGuy, please don't be discouraged that your first article was nominated for deletion -- it has happened to a lot of veteran editors. You may wish to keep WP:BAND handy as you continue to improve the article. A Traintalk 16:32, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrés Ceballos Sanchez[edit]

Andrés Ceballos Sanchez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of independent notability, apart from the notability of the band itself. JTtheOG (talk) 20:59, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 14:00, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Of note is that the article was expanded after the nomination for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:34, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Decepticons. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Skywarp[edit]

Skywarp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 21:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since the proposed redirect/merge target no longer exists, where to instead?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 14:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To again answer the question where to merge/redirect to. I currently see no consensus to delete but neither to keep as it is but without target this can't be closed as redirect or merge
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A Traintalk 16:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Georgians in Canada[edit]

Georgians in Canada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This small group doesn't appear to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. The population figures can be covered at Ethnic origins of people in Canada. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, the National Household Survey asked a question about ethnicity, and some people wrote in "Georgian". See Q17 here. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:08, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Larry, not sure you need to answer every comment - but of course I don't mind, if you want to. Yes, you have been nominating similar articles for deletion before, as those discussions show. I respect that, but I don't agree with you. I actually find Any nationality in any country to be notable. We don't have too little space, and any of these articles is to some extent notable (much more notable than unknown football players in fifth tier, whom Wikipedia for some reason consider notable). If we decide they are not notable, then where do we draw the line. Why would Americans in Canada be notable but not Georgians in Canada. More numerous, sure, but then we're back to the line. 1000 people? 5000? 10.000? Actually, I once read a long and fascinating article on the only Jew remaining in Afghanistan. 1 person, yet notable. So my answers would be that any nationality in any country is a notable topic, and I see no reason to delete any of them. Jeppiz (talk) 22:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not about there being a numerical threshold, Jeppiz. Notability is judged by whether there is significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Bigger groups are more likely to attract that sort of coverage, but there's nothing to say that a small group can't have been subject to it. In this case, the sources to demonstrate notability simply don't exist (unless you can prove me wrong). Cordless Larry (talk) 22:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  07:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danny McKinnon[edit]

Danny McKinnon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability with the exception of Kohaku from Inuyasha. Sk8erPrince (talk) 07:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:41, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:41, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 13:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as made-up by creator and no claim of notability. (A7, A11) (non-admin closure) KGirlTrucker81 (Wanna chat?) 12:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Engineer Maulana Muhammad Ali[edit]

Engineer Maulana Muhammad Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails to meet WP:GNG. cited sources not RS. Saqib (talk) 04:49, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Very happy to userfy the page upon request -- just swing by my talk page. A Traintalk 16:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the Blinds AKA Filmmaking 101[edit]

Behind the Blinds AKA Filmmaking 101 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. - MrX 10:57, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 04:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
alts:
director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pasha Kerimov[edit]

Pasha Kerimov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale by article's creator. All the current citations are simple listings or primary sources. Couldn't find any in-depth coverage of this individual through searches. Can't even find a single citation count for him. Onel5969 TT me 12:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 04:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I will treat this as a softdelete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Open Identity Exchange UK Europe[edit]

Open Identity Exchange UK Europe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicate of Open Identity Exchange Rathfelder (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:57, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 04:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No clear consensus despite two relists. No prejudice to renomination in few months if sourcing hasn't improved. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina Trade and Cultural Office[edit]

Argentina Trade and Cultural Office (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. Embassies which this is a de facto one are not inherently notable. Gnews turns up 1 hit when I searched English (actually a Chinese story) and 2 Hits in Spanish. 1 which only mentioned the office in 1 line. Also as a side point, I hardly think the tall tower in article is entire office. LibStar (talk) 22:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 14:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
you're arguing for inherent notability when there isn't any. LibStar (talk) 06:12, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 04:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
existing is not the same as being notable. LibStar (talk) 06:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merrill Gay[edit]

Merrill Gay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. reddogsix (talk) 04:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thank you to seb26 for an unusually clear and exhaustively argued nomination. A Traintalk 16:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Rush Condon[edit]

Samuel Rush Condon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject isn't notable enough. WP:ARTIST is the criteria most relevant here. I'll address its points specifically.

First it speaks to the need for artists (1) being widely regarded, generally being cited by peers, or contributing a technique, and so on. None of the reliable sources ([16], [17], [18] The Australian, view this with google cache, [19]) or one other I found ([20]) speak extensively at all about the artist, only ever in relation to the portrait they are mentioning. Two sites ([21], [22]) present more biographical info about the artist, the first is a blog interview based on quotes from the artist, and the second is a blog post by a fashion outlet, so these are not reliable. Discounting these, the reliable ones linked above are capable of confirming perhaps just the artist's birth year, place, education, and some of the competitions they have entered. There is not enough in them, however, to confirm details about their style, specialities or any other critical review about their practice.

Next the criteria speaks to an artist's work itself otherwise needing to (3) "be the subject of independent periodical articles or reviews" or (4c) "receiving significant critical attention". These sources ([23], [24]) do speak about specific paintings by Condon, but being bio page entries, the body of the text mostly is composed of quotes from the artist themselves, they are not accompanied by actual critical review. The Australian above does give a brief statement about the portrait, "tiny but fine". No further critical review appears and the article moves on to discuss other people. Since the works are always portraits, most of the articles are spent discussing the specific famous person that appears in the portrait and the quoted comments from Condon also don't speak about the work so much as the personality of that famous person themselves (for example, Australian prime minister in the Herald Sun piece).

Finally the criteria speaks to the need for artists to have their work (4a) be a significant monument, (4b) a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or (4d) be represented in several permanent collections. This artist's work has been a finalist of many competitions, but this is not significant enough because, well, the competitions themselves are really not significant enough themselves. The ones I researched do not actually exhibit works physically. The works that are actually discussed in the sources, have been finalists in the Archibald Prize and the Bayside Acquisitive Art Prize. The Bayside prize is not covered on Wikipedia and in the year that Condon was entered, there were also 29 other finalists [25].

Archibald Prize, which is of course prominent in the arts scene in Australia, selects 40-50 finalists each year. There are suggestions that in general the work of finalists is not highly valued ([26], [27]). The finalists' works are never physically exhibited by the organisers of the prize. Looking at the years that Condon was in (2014, 2015), not many other non-winners are subjects of Wikipedia articles, and those that are, have notability for other reasons like permanent exhibition or other critical review (examples: 1, 2, 3). I found only one other notable competition entry for Condon, Salon des Refusés in 2016, which is an annual showcase of Archibald Prize rejects. This is the one of two times that Condon's work appears to have been exhibited physically in a gallery, temporarily, and there were 40 other artists also exhibited at this [28]. The other time was in 2011, a temporary exhibition “Space invaders” at the National Gallery of Australia. News/critical coverage of this exhibition was limited, with one press-like announcement ([29] and one critical discussion text [30] that fails to mention Condon’s piece.

In sum, this is generally the largest failure of the notability criteria: the lack of public/permanent exhibition of work, and the scarcity of sources that discuss the person or their works. seb26 (talk) 02:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Aoziwe please clarify 'SPA', and try to avoid obscure abbreviations. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have artworks in numerous public collections including and not limited to the top art institutions in Australia: the national allergy of Australia, national library of australia, national library of Victoria, Ballarat regional gallery, etc
I have tried to follow this up, and found Honest 2010 on the National Gallery of Australia's website.[31] This appears to have been part of the Space Invaders show in 2011, but it was "Acquired with the support of Calypso Mary Efkarpidis", which I interpret as meaning that this work in now is in the permanent collection of the NGA. I failed to find anything on the the National Library of Australia's website. At the State Library of Victoria I found what appear to be books written and self-published by Condon.[32][33][34] If these are one-off or small limited editions artworks then they could count as "work in the permanent collection". At the Ballarat Regional Gallery I only found a listing of Condon as a finalist for the Rick Amor Drawing Prize 2016 (already in the article).[35]
A work in the permanent collection of the National Gallery of Australia is significant when considering notability. It is unclear whether the books in the State Library of Victoria count under this clause. I have not found work in the collections of several institutions (per WP:ARTIST clause 4d), but these are only guidelines, and we need to exercise editorial judgement. Does this allow us to keep the article? Verbcatcher (talk) 04:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Verbcatcher, I found Honest in the NGA here. It is a zine as well as those other 3 in the State Library of Victoria. For the Ballarat Regional Gallery, I'm not sure, they do hold works in a permanent collection, [36] but no keywords for Condon came up (although the page suggests that the collection is not wholly available online yet). (But just like the other competitions I don't see it being likely that they would permanently hold finalists' work from a given year.) The NGA work is a good find and I'd cautiously support the other zines as being relevant to the criteria for permanent exhibition, but I have to admit my reservations about the way that this article could be written substantially with what appears to be such limited discussion in the sources relating to the subject themselves, aside from birthplace and his education. seb26 (talk) 12:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charles T. Gidiney[edit]

Charles T. Gidiney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article isn't really notable except for a crank claim to have found an exact rational value for pi. But such claims have been common and don't really establish notability on their own. Even the reporting on it from the time was pretty minor. Everything else is just bootstrapping from almost exclusively 19th century primary sources. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 01:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Polish supercentenarians. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jadwiga Szubartowicz[edit]

Jadwiga Szubartowicz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:BLP1E. No evidence of any claim to notability or coverage not based more or less exclusively on the subject's age (111). If this were the oldest person in the world I'd probably consider that as notable. But every country has an oldest person and there is a rather high turnover rate to that title. Additionally it just is not that unusual anymore for people to live past 100, even well past. And lastly if being the oldest person in a given country is enough to ring the N bell then we are opening the flood gates to a potential wave of similar 1E articles. See also the discussion on the article talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:40, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:40, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Polish supercentenarians, per CommanderLinx below, does seem a more appropriate target for the redirect. David in DC (talk) 14:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@David in DC, Pawnkingthree & Stormy clouds The problem with a redirect is that she is not on the target list anymore. The lady has died. (Memory eternal) -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm cool with deleting it, but I think there's still a list on that page she's still on. There are a couple of lists on the page. She's under oldest by country for Poland. She's just not on oldest living by country. These World's Oldest People pages are pretty wacky. David in DC (talk) 04:43, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, as the oldest ever Pole who didn't emigrate, her death doesn't affect her entry on the list. Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Queen (musician)[edit]

Jeff Queen (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable musician who has not had a significant solo or collaborative career. The article is almost entirely sourced by his website. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Laney[edit]

Alan Laney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was previously sent to deletion, and soft-deleted after three relists failed to attract any discussion whatsoever, then taken to WP:REFUND and cleaned up. While the article has sources, they do not seem to meet WP:SIGCOV or WP:RS.

This article mentions Alan Laney, but only as the writer of a song for which the singer, not the writer, was nominated.

References 7 and 8 do not mention him at all, and 9 is just a BMI catalog of his songs. Even I have songs listed in BMI; that doesn't make me notable.

While it's not in question that Laney has written songs for other artists, none of those songs was released as a single, nor was any song he wrote notable in its own right. His own performance credits are meager at best, and do not meet WP:BAND. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.