The result was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be a notable product, as it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. The sources in the article talk more about other products rather than Happy Ratio itself. A7 was declined by Ritchie333 Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
I am not sure where I provide the argument to not delete the article, so I will just do it here. Happy Ratio is made by the SAME people that made The Perfect Meal, and SupermealX. The SupermealX and it's creator (Harsh Batra) were featured in very crdible media such as the New York Times, Economic Times, etc. Happy Ratio is the evolution and in a sense a rebranding of the SupermealX, so every article about th e SupermealX does apply to Happy Ratio as well, including of course NYTimes. To sum it up, Happy Ratio WAS SupermealX till a couple of months ago, and this new iteration just rebrands and markets ot more properly, but everything else is about the same as SupermealX (which recieved a lot of coverage and was clearly a notable product, hence the same applied to Happy Ratio). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshinvader (talk • contribs) 03:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
I added a history section to the article. Hope it makes clear that this is a notable product as it has received coverage from trusted news organisations.
Can I now go ahead and remove the deletion warning?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshinvader (talk • contribs)