The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus. Not enough support to draftify in this close. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 06:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guddi (TV series)

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON and WP:UPE. The only sources are press releases of a projected series. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete toosoon, promotional. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article has a touch of foreshadowing which is very much WP:TOOSOON. I wouldn't be so quick to point out WP:UPE without evidence to prove it. There is a much stronger case against the article based on content policy rather than relying on unproven/unconfirmed editor behavior. --ARose Wolf 19:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: @ARoseWolf: The show hasn't started yet nor any promo was launched. And not much sources are available. How the cast section is so long with the name of every characters? Either paid editing or fake editing I think. Shinnosuke15, 23:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shinnosuke15: I can only see that the show seems to have started filming as per the Times of India reference in Darjeeling as per the article. 2402:3A80:1A4A:7B3E:F7A6:372B:9AA2:A57D (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But sources confirm only three cast members without the names of the characters. And any of them doesn't mention the name of the show. That is my concern. Shinnosuke15, 05:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The name of the show is out in Anandabazar Patrika as Guddi. See this. 2402:3A80:6F7:58C2:B15F:4BB8:A996:D544 (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Falls under WP:TOOSOON, and the article seems promotional in nature. Tosi | they/them | ^t/_c 20:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: The article is developed and it clearly passes WP:GNG and WP:NTV, plus it is supported by press notable and reliable press releases too. Deleting such an article will be a great loss to the encyclopedia. The creator of the article has created many articles, and all are of well quality and up at mainspace, and admins have not brought any concern either. None of them has been deleted. Though there can be a case of paid editing, but the article is of good quality and passes Wikipedia's quality standards. So, the article can be kept, as there is nothing wrong with the article. A topic ban for the creator can be another alternative of deleting the article. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing in the draft to show that WP:GNG is met, and press releases never count towards notability. AfD is not the place to discuss topic bans (and it wouldn't be an alternative to deletion anyway.) --bonadea contributions talk 08:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea Well, I wonder if it would have landed in AFD, if I would not have brought specific attention to the article. It is unlikely that foreign editors who don't understand Bengali, understand that is WP:TOOSOON, especially when there are so many sources now. If we would not have pointed out, that it was toosoon, I doubt it would have ever ended up in AFD. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 06:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm not sure about the deletion of the article. There are reliable sources which proves about the show, but none of them mention the name 'Guddi'. If the article does not get deleted before the official announcement of the show, my vote is keep. Shinnosuke15, 04:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As per the creator they mentioned February 2022 (next month) as the start date but we dont have any reliable source to verify it. 2402:3A80:1A4A:7B3E:F7A6:372B:9AA2:A57D (talk) 04:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shinnosuke15 It does now. See this. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 06:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Itcouldbepossible: The source says that the name can be changed. Shinnosuke15, 13:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – none of the sources indicates notability; in fact, none of the sources would be used in an article about a clearly notable topic. --bonadea contributions talk 08:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON; sources do not meet WP:NTV. Miniapolis 23:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify it is too soon as the comments above indicate, but with production about to start, I have no issue with incubation/work by independent editors to prepare for it to move back should it become notable. Star Mississippi 16:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agletarang (talk • contribs) 19:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Concur with reasoning from nominator. This is WP:TOOSOON without the sources needed to show notability. Given the lack of sources, the impressive detail almost certainly comes from someone connected to the show, WP:COI and WP:PAID are very possible. An option would be to move this to draft with the requirement that an established reviewer must accept this. This needs far better sourcing and information - a good review section would be very helpful. Right now though, WAYYY too soon. Ravensfire (talk) 02:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom and other voters. This obviously does NOT meet the GNG, and rather than this being a "great loss" to the encyclopedia -- rather a farcical bit of hyperbole -- I'd suggest rather that losing this NN article is a loss practically no one will ever notice. No objection to draftification though, and indeed nothing prevents the creator from doing so. Ravenswing 17:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify I have moved the page to draft as it is not on a good place to be on mainpage, hope users will add more references soon after the project shares any teaser of the show. ... २ तकरपेप्सी _talk 21:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@२ तकर पेप्सी: Don't move pages before the discussion is closed. You are not supposed to take your own decision. Know the rules before you act next time. 2402:3A80:1A48:F5F2:430B:2659:78F3:E93B (talk) 04:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2402:3A80:1A48:F5F2:430B:2659:78F3:E93B: Thankyou for your guidance I was not aware of this that before closing an discussion I can't move it to the draft, thanks. ... २ तकरपेप्सी _talk 07:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The promo of the show has been launched. See this. Maybe it doesn't meet WP:RS, but probably fails WP:TOOSOON. Shinnosuke15, 01:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Since the promo realesed on the Star Jalsha official YouTube channel, so WP:TOOSOON stands invalid. It is expected more WP:RS will come up and the shooting of the show is currently in progress at Darjeeling as per published reports. 2402:3A80:69B:69BC:75FF:D9D0:9F8E:5613 (talk) 06:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.