The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. v/r - TP 03:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hao Lulu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe that this "artificial beauty" is sufficiently notable. WP:15M. Delete. Nlu (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 06:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've just added 4 more reliable sources that give significant coverage. Her name, both in Chinese and English, gets plenty of G hits. Pol430 talk to me 23:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.