The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hungry Harvest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply a PR business listing in which everything is clear PR, regardless of anything or anyone else, and searches noticeably found nothing at all but actual local published and republished and local news stories; none of that establishes notability regardless, because our policies explicitly state any intentions of business advertising and "LinkedIn-esque" matters are unacceptable. In fact WP:NOT is the first policy we started for such occasions. Even compare the article with this and now, and see how enlarged the named-mentions of others and accompanying PR have in fact made the article worse, hence it actually goes to show that's all this literally is, policy is quite clear about it so we delete. SwisterTwister talk 04:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Sounds promotional and reads like a press release. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:PROMO. This copy belongs on the company web site not in the encyclopedia. WP:TOOSOON applies as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.