The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

International Capital Markets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable company. No reliable sources, just press releases. PROD declined without comment by what appears to be a sock of the article creator or a COI editor. Safiel (talk) 06:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete again. The argument by Smerdis of Tlön on the January 2012 AfD still stands. All I am seeing is routine press announcements relating to the firm's services. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH criteria of encyclopaedic notability; no reason to overturn the previous AfD. AllyD (talk) 07:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Yet another cookie cutter article about a non-notable online share trading firm Nick-D (talk) 10:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as per WP:G4 and Salt AlanS (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 12:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The 8th reference from Tech Marking (which looks unreliable) claims it is the 'biggest' forex broker in the country. However I cannot find anything to support that claim and therefore I don't think it is notable. - Shiftchange (talk) 22:13, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.