The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With no arguments for keeping this article, the consensus is to delete. Should they meet the criteria for inclusion at a future date, an article can be re-created. PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 19:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kiat Goh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

appears to be paid for promo about a non-notable musician. the few sources that exist about him are questionable at best, straitstimes in particular has the most hits which is dubious considering their history of sloppy reporting. Praxidicae (talk) 13:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment WP:NSINGER does not appear to be met (except, perhaps, point 1 which trends along a clarification of GNG). Whether WP:GNG is would depend on how reliable these sources are. I'm not too familiar on them myself. I'll probably look into the sources and update this comment. I think some input from the WikiProject might also be of help. From a look at the sources currently, I'd trend towards WP:TOOSOON at this stage. Input from the WikiProject may be of value. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would say WP:TOOSOON as well. – robertsky (talk) 05:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:NSINGER. It is likely too soon per above. The sources towards notability just do not meet the criteria, especially for a BLP. With that in mind, and since Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, there would be no objection to recreation when better sources are available. WP:NEXIST is used a lot as a reason to keep but it also includes However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface. -- Otr500 (talk) 22:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for not meeting WP:MUSICBIO. First two citations are industry sites reporting media digital content. Lacks broad coverage outside of Singapore. Tutored by a Grammy-award-winning Reiner Goldberg but there is no inherited notability by studying with a notable person. No singles or albums on his country's music charts. Not yet. Blue Riband► 01:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.