The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is that the article should be kept and moved to KITCO. However, KITCO redirects to Kitco India, so I am going to keep it there - if anyone feels strongly that it should be a KITCO with the redirect being from Kitco India to KITCO, then feel free to go to Requested moves PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:49, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kitco India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No pages link to it apart from a redirect and it has COI issues Aaabbccz Talk Contribs 20:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The nominator would do well to explain why the page should be deleted. None of the statements in their request are reasons for deletion. They are reasons for improvement. Pedro :  Chat  20:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have searched for it in Google and all it seams to come up with is gold price. Aaabbccz Talk Contribs 20:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Try searching Kerala Industrial ....i.e. this lot. Assuming they are the same (per the article) this is a redirect / merge and expand not a deletion. Pedro :  Chat  20:38, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- JN466 15:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see that there is no reasons for the page to delete as per the policies I know about of Wikipedia. Here is comment that he searched the net and got only http://kitco.com Why don't he go down the page and see the http://kitco.in link. The first one is bullion company and http://kitco.in is a public sector technical consultancy firm in India. I wrote the page not to promote the company, but to inform about the activities of the Government organisation. About the COI issue, I think it is far better for some one from the company (like me) to write about it so that the facts will be accurate. And I thought what Wikipedia care more about is accuracy. Jacob universe - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobkitco (talk • contribs) 09:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- JN466 15:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, and move to KITCO (Canadian entity is at Kitco, I've sorted out the hatnotes). No valid reason for deletion of this article about a notable government body. May need some trimming and cleanup, but it's notable and sourced. PamD (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, and move to KITCO, based upon PamD (talk)'s thoughtful suggestion above. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.