The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Withdrawing, self-assessment snow keep (non-admin closure) IgelRM (talk) 23:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liberate Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I realize this is controversial, but the game doesn't appear to have sufficient independent notability and the primary topic for title would be Liberate Hong Kong, the revolution of our times. IgelRM (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Hong Kong. IgelRM (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. No case has been made why the current sources are insufficient. Additional sources are also easy to find via a quick search (1 2 3 4). No WP:BEFORE was done here. Cortador (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep: Found sources with SIGCOV from BBC News[1], Bloomberg[2], South China Morning Post[3][4], Hong Kong Free Press[5], The Straits Times[6], Taipei Times[7], Eurogamer[8], United Daily News[9], Liberty Times[10], etc. An obvious pass of GNG and I agree with Cortador that clearly no BEFORE was done prior to this nomination. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above Microplastic Consumer (talk) 18:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there was clearly no WP:BEFORE search done. Easily passes the bar for notability. λ NegativeMP1 15:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Passes WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 17:47, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Sufficient amount of SIGCOV is obtainable per sources found by Prince of Erebor and Cortador. MK at your service. 18:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources found above. The only controversy here is the lack of a proper BEFORE search. Sergecross73 msg me 18:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.