The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsey White[edit]

Lindsey White (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note that the 1st AfD is for someone else or else I would've G4. As for this article, simply none of this suggests better for WP:CREATIVE and examining the article found nothing else convincing and my searches also found nothing noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Noteable artist[1] with a long carrer and international exibitions of her work and more than enough independent news sources[2] from reliable sources, but the article really needs cleaned up. (Funny note: In 2013, one of her art works was named TWISTED SISTERS, how ironic is that!) Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 10:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Question Hi @SwisterTwister: In the span of a few hours you've nominated for deletion the articles of two notable artists (Fred Cray and Lindsey White) and one of Mexico's most prominent architects Bernardo Gómez-Pimienta. Granted, all of their articles need work, but is that the reason you're nominating them? Or, are you an expert in this subject seeing things others aren't? Just wondering, and hopefully, willing to learn your evaluation process as it would, most certainly, save me a lot of research time. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 11:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Several museum shows, inclusion in two books, reviews by artforum, artslant, sfgate meets the requirements for WP:ARTISTMduvekot (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Notability established by the 37 References and Notes cited in the article. Cheers! ((u|Checkingfax)) {Talk} 20:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Incomprehensible. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Sourcing demonstrates notability. Only in death does duty end (talk) 10:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Agree that sourcing adequately demonstrates notability. Should not have been nominated. —Prhartcom♥ 13:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.