The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Marvell Technology Group chipsets[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Overly specific listcruft, no sourcing found. important only to gearheads if at all Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The individual chipsets themselves are not notable so nothing more than directory of expertcruft. Mattg82 (talk) 21:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NOTCATALOGUE WP:FANCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 02:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments @Mattg82: and @Ajf773:, how on earth can you call this Fancraft? That makes no sense what so ever! I can't see how you can even apply that rational to delete this article, Not a Catalogue I can understand, however I see 36 references to this list, I for one can't see many people needing this resource and can't see how it adds anything to wikipedia, if someone is looking for this information I am sure they will seek a primary source and this wikipedia page isn't that. But you two really need to work on your arguments for deleting a page. Govvy (talk) 13:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I called it expertcruft, I only pointed to fancruft for something related to link to. My idea of what cruft is, is probably different to yours. But however you want to define the contents of this page, there is a lot of excessive detail here, including a lot of WP:HOWTO make it work on Linux, making it hard to read. Mattg82 (talk) 21:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: excessive listcruft & WP:NOTMANUAL. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.