The result was snowball keep - non admin closure by Giggy Talk | Review 05:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nomination. Article was previously nominated in a group, but consensus was to break the group apart and list individually. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of horror film killers (2nd nomination). Abstain. ●DanMS • Talk 06:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note on the procedural nomination. This article was listed in the original nominator’s group deletion (see above), but the nominator did not place an AFD tag on the article, nor did he create the discussion page (this page). I placed the AFD banner on the article and created this page because this article was on the nominator’s list. ●DanMS • Talk 16:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To all Keep and especially RandomCritic above: I don't care if its FA or its got a billion sources, that doesn't mean it has any greater right to not be deleted. I'm not arguing wehter its sourced: I'm saying it seems to be flying in the face of WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information. Come on then, its a list of people with epilepsy. Now, couldn't that just be made into a category, Category:Persons with Epilepsy, or whatnot? Why do we need a list which if we look at it literally could include millions of people. Not only that, it could fall under listcrufty parameters. If this were an article about Epileptic people with something like critical commentary not associated with labeling people as epileptic or no, then I wouldn't be here. David Fuchs (talk) 12:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]